Review Article

Valvular Cardiomyopathy: The Value of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Table 1

Techniques available with CMR and comparison with echocardiography. Symbol “+” represents “good” and “++” represents “very good.” Symbol “−” is used when there is no means to assess the particular method.

Assessment methodsCMREchocardiography

Chamber quantification (wall thickness, mass, and volumes)+++
The high spatial resolution allows accurate qualitative and quantitative assessment of cardiac chambersMeasurements are dependent on several parameters (acoustic windows, endocardial definition, on-axis/off-axis views, and sonographer)
Assessment of myocardial deformation (most commonly global longitudinal strain)++++
Dedicated accurate sequences can be used for CMR strain. Furthermore, reproducible method of myocardial deformation assessment using feature tracking postprocessing of SSFP cine imagesA reproducible method that provides valuable information, as long as certain requirements are fulfilled (clear endocardial definition and frame rate >50)
Comprehensive assessment of valvular anatomy and structure+++
Unlimited imaging planes and high spatial resolution help in the detailed assessment of simple and complex valvular anatomyComprehensive anatomical assessment that is, however, limited in a certain number of imaging planes and by spatial resolution, which is lower compared to CMR
Qualitative and quantitative assessment of valvular lesions (regurgitation/stenosis)++++
CMR is very useful in the assessment of the severity of valvular lesions that are difficult to be quantified with echocardiography (e.g., very eccentric jets)High temporal resolution and assessment with colour and continuous wave Doppler offers a detailed evaluation of the severity of valvular lesions
Tissue characterisation (LGE and T1 mapping)++
CMR is the gold standard method for direct assessment of fibrosis with the use of LGE and T1 mapping techniquesNot available with echocardiography. Echocardiography backscatter can associate with myocardial fibrosis, but it is not an accurate method.