Research Article
Integrated Model of Joint Residence-Workplace Location Choice and Commute Behavior Using Latent Class and Mixed Logit Methods
Table 5
Estimation results of four latent classes.
| Variables | Class 1 | Class 2 | Class 3 | Class 4 |
| House renting price | −0.9568 (−18.48) | −0.1823 (−2.40) | −0.1734 (−4.41) | −0.2153 (−8.60) |
| Commute distance (M) | −0.1953 (−12.63) | −0.1174 (−3.72) | −0.5049 (−10.10) | −0.2662 (−9.83) |
| Commute distance (S.D.) | 0.3115 (14.49) | 0.1762 (5.06) | 0.2878 (6.65) | −0.1417 (−4.72) |
| Commute time (M) | −0.03623 (−2.37) | −0.0305 (5.22) | −0.0128 (−2.89) | −0.0582 (4.96) |
| Commute time (S.D.) | −1.14E − 04 (0) | −0.0139 (−1.02) | 7.69E − 05 (0) | −2.10E − 04 (0) |
| Household monthly income | 1.0919 (24.82) | 2.0387 (15.55) | 1.0537 (13.47) | 1.3504 (16.82) |
| Population density | 0.9441 (18.36) | −0.9983 (−4.24) | −0.1624 (−15.63) | −0.0763 (−6.01) |
| Number of employment opportunities | 0.0648 (10.31) | 0.0665 (4.74) | 0.1113 (3.66) | 0.2311 (4.67) |
| GDP of workplace | 0.3617 (14.24) | 0.2288 (9.06) | 0.3973 (6.60) | 0.1594 (3.40) |
|
|
Here M means “mean value”; S.D. means “standard deviation.”
|