Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2015, Article ID 657352, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/657352
Research Article

Exploring Different Order Decision Behaviors with Bullwhip Effect and Service Level Measures in Supply Chain System

1Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
2School of Information Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China

Received 17 September 2014; Revised 26 March 2015; Accepted 6 April 2015

Academic Editor: Juan Pavón

Copyright © 2015 Zhuoqun Li and Guangle Yan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. E. Schweitzer and G. P. Cachon, “Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: experimental evidence,” Management Science, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 404–420, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  2. M. Kremer, S. Minner, and L. N. Van Wassenhove, “Do random errors explain newsvendor behavior?” Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 673–681, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. X. Su, “Bounded rationality in newsvendor models,” Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 566–589, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. H. Ho, L. Noah, and H. T. Cui, “Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: a structural analysis,” Management Science, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 1891–1910, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. E. Bolton and E. Katok, “Learning by doing in the newsvendor problem: a laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback,” Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 519–538, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. H. Lurie and J. M. Swaminathan, “Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 315–329, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Forrester, “Industrial dynamics: a major breakthrough for decision makers,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 36, pp. 37–66, 1958. View at Google Scholar
  8. J. D. Sterman, “Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment,” Management Science, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 321–339, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. R. Croson and K. Donohue, “Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information,” Management Science, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 323–336, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. Oliva and P. Gonçalves, “Behavioral causes of demand amplification in supply chains: ‘satisficing’ policies with limited information cues,” in Proceedings of the International System Dynamics Conference, Boston, Mass, USA, July 2005.
  11. A. Kaboli, N. Cheikhrouhou, M. Darvish et al., “An experimental study of the relationship between trust and inventory replenishment in triadic supply chain,” in Proceedings of the 4th Production and Operations Management World Conference, pp. 1–10, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012.
  12. K. L. Schultz, L. W. Robinson, L. J. Thomas et al., “The use of framing in inventory decisions,” Working Paper, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  13. K. E. Stanovich and R. F. West, “Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 645–726, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. W. Hutchinson, W. A. Kamakura, and J. G. Lynch Jr., “Unobserved heterogeneity as an alternative explanation for ‘reversal’ effects in behavioral research,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 324–344, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. H. Doerr, T. Freed, T. R. Mitchell et al., “Work flow policy and within-worker and between-workers variability in performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 911–921, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. Croson, K. Schultz, E. Siemsen, and M. L. Yeo, “Behavioral operations: the state of the field,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 31, no. 1-2, pp. 1–5, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Cui, J. Chen, and Y.-B. Xiao, “Behavioral inventory management: research overview and prospects,” Journal of Management Sciences in China, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 96–108, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  18. B. B. Moritz, A. V. Hill, and K. L. Donohue, “Individual differences in the newsvendor problem: behavior and cognitive reflection,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 31, no. 1-2, pp. 72–85, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. de Véricourt, K. Jain, J. N. Bearden, and A. Filipowicz, “Sex, risk and the newsvendor,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 31, no. 1-2, pp. 86–92, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Cui, L. Chen, J. Chen et al., “Behavioral tendencies in newsvendor decision making: capturing the Chinese perspective,” Working Paper, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  21. J. Dejonckheere, S. M. Disney, M. R. Lambrecht, and D. R. Towill, “Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: a control theoretic approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 147, no. 3, pp. 567–590, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X. Wang, S. M. Disney, and J. Wang, “Exploring the oscillatory dynamics of a forbidden returns inventory system,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 147, part A, pp. 3–12, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H. Sarimveis, P. Patrinos, C. D. Tarantilis, and C. T. Kiranoudis, “Dynamic modeling and control of supply chain systems: a review,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 3530–3561, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. T. Niranjan, S. M. Wagner, and C. Bode, “An alternative theoretical explanation and empirical insights into overordering behavior in supply chains,” Decision Sciences, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 859–888, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. Bendoly, R. Croson, P. Goncalves, and K. Schultz, “Bodies of knowledge for research in behavioral operations,” Production and Operations Management, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 434–452, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. U. Benzion, Y. Cohen, R. Peled, and T. Shavit, “Decision-making and the newsvendor problem: an experimental study,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 1281–1287, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice,” Science, vol. 211, no. 4481, pp. 453–458, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. H. B. Hwarng and X. Yuan, “Interpreting supply chain dynamics: a quasi-chaos perspective,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 233, no. 3, pp. 566–579, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus