Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society

Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 969726, 8 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/969726

## Fixed Points of Generalized -Suzuki Type Contraction in Complete -Metric Spaces

^{1}Nonlinear Analysis and Applied Mathematics Research Group (NAAM), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia^{2}Department of Mathematics, Atılım University, Incek, 06836 Ankara, Turkey^{3}Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Basic Science, University of Bonab, P.O. Box 5551-761167, Bonab, Iran

Received 29 September 2014; Accepted 25 November 2014

Academic Editor: Binggen Zhang

Copyright © 2015 Hamed Hamdan Alsulami et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We introduce the notion of generalized -Suzuki type contraction in -metric spaces and investigate the existence of fixed points of such mappings. The presented results generalize and improve several results of the topics in the literature.

#### 1. Introduction and Preliminaries

The concept of -metric was introduced by Czerwik [1] as a generalization of metric (see also Bakhtin [2, 3]) to extend celebrated Banach contraction mapping principle. Following this initial paper of Czerwik [1], a number of researchers in nonlinear analysis investigate the topology of the paper and proved several fixed point theorems in the context of complete -metric spaces (see, e.g., [4–8] and the related references therein).

*Definition 1 (see [1]). *Let be a nonempty set and let be a given real number. A mapping is said to be a -metric if for all the following conditions are satisfied: if and only if ;;.In this case, the pair is called a -metric space (with constant ).

*Remark 2. *It is clear that the notion of -metric is a real generalization of usual metric since a -metric space is a metric space when . For more details and examples on -metric, see, for example, [1, 3, 9, 10].

*Example 3. *Let and let a mapping be defined as follows:
Then, is a -metric space with coefficient . But it is not a metric space since the triangle inequality is not satisfied. Indeed,

*Definition 4 (see [11]). *Let be a -metric space. Then, a sequence in is called(A)convergent if and only if there exists such that as and in this case we write ;(B)Cauchy if and only if as .

*Remark 5 (see [11]). *Notice that in a -metric space the following assertions hold:(A)a convergent sequence has a unique limit;(B)each convergent sequence is Cauchy;(C)in general, a -metric is not continuous;(D)in general, a -metric does not induce a topology on .

*Definition 6 (see [11]). *The -metric space is complete if every Cauchy sequence in converges in .

*Definition 7. *Let and be -metric spaces; a mapping is called (A)continuous at a point , if for every sequence in such that , then ;(B)continuous on , if it is continuous at each point .

#### 2. Main Result

In this section we state and prove our main results. Throughout the paper, we assume that -metric is continuous.

Inspired by the notion of -contraction, defined by Wardowski [12], we introduce the notion of generalized -Suzuki type contraction as follows. , , denote the set of natural numbers, set of real numbers, and the set of non-negative real numbers.

*Definition 8. *Let be a -metric space with constant . A mapping is called a generalized -Suzuki type contraction if there exists such that for all with
where and are real numbers with and is a mapping satisfying the following conditions: is strictly increasing; that is, for all such that , ;for every sequence of positive real numbers if and only if .

The following is the main result of this paper.

Theorem 9. *Let be a complete -metric space with constant . If is a generalized -Suzuki type contraction, then has a fixed point .*

*Proof. *Fix . We establish an iterative sequence in the following way:
Throughout the proof, we assume that
Indeed, if there exists such that , then the proof is completed trivially.

Due to assumption (5), we have
Thus, by hypotheses of theorem, we have
which is equivalent to
Since , inequality (8) turns into
From , we conclude that
Therefore, is a decreasing sequence of real numbers which is bounded from below. Therefore, converges and
We will show that . Suppose, on the contrary, that . In other words, for every there exists , such that
From , we find that
On the other hand, we have
due to (6). Since is generalized -Suzuki type contraction, we derive
which yields that
Taking the fact that into account, we find

Analogously, again by (6), we have . Owing to the fact that is generalized -Suzuki type contraction, we conclude that
It implies that
since . Furthermore, by combining (17) and (20), we get

Iteratively, we obtain that

By letting , we find that
Consequently, from (), we derive that . Thus, there exists such that
and from (4) we get
This is a contradiction with the definition of . Hence, we have

In what follows, we will prove that
Suppose, on the contrary, that there exist and sequences and of natural numbers such that
From the triangle inequality, we have

Owing to (25), there exists such that

Taking (29) into account, (28) yields that
So from , we obtain

On the other hand, we can easily get that
from (27) and (29). Since is generalized -Suzuki type contraction, for all we find that
Taking (31) into account, (33) turns into
Regarding (25) and , we obtain that
From , we get that
This is a contradiction with relations in (27). Hence, ; that is, is a Cauchy sequence in . On account of the completeness of , there exists such that
We claim that, for every ,
We will prove the claim above by the method of* reductio ad absurdum*. Suppose, on the contrary, that there exists such that
From (10) and , we have
It follows from (39) and (40) that
This is a contradiction. Hence, (38) holds. Since is generalized -Suzuki type contraction, (38) yields that, for every , either
or
holds. On account of , the limits in (25) and (37) imply that
Thus, letting in (42), we conclude that
Again by using , we observe that
By regarding the triangle inequality with (4), we derive that
By letting in the inequality above together with the limits in (37) and (46), we conclude that . Thus, is a fixed point of ; that is, .

Let us analyze the second case (42). Regarding (4), we have
As it was discussed above, from (25), (37), and , we conclude that
From equivalently, we get
Again by the triangle inequality together with (4), we find that
By letting in the inequality above together with the limits in (37) and (50), we obtain . Thus, is a fixed point of and that completes the proof.

*Definition 10. *Let be a -metric space with constant . A mapping is said to be a -Suzuki type contraction if there exists such that for all with
where is a mapping satisfying the following conditions.() is strictly increasing; that is, for all such that , .()For every sequence of positive real numbers if and only if .

Theorem 11. *Let be complete -metric space with constant and let be a -Suzuki type contraction mapping. Then, has a fixed point.*

*Proof. *By taking and in Theorem 9, the proof is complete.

Corollary 12. *Let be a self-mapping on a complete metric space . Let and be real numbers such that . Assume that there exists such that, for all with ,
**
where is satisfied in conditions and . Then, has a fixed point ; that is, .*

*Proof. *Since any metric space is a -metric space with constant , so from Theorem 9 the proof is complete.

Corollary 13. *Let be a self-mapping on a complete metric space . Assume that there exists such that, for all with ,
**
where is satisfied in conditions and . Then, has a fixed point ; that is, .*

*Proof. *Since any metric space is a -metric space with constant , so by taking and in Theorem 9 the proof is complete.

Theorem 14. *Let be complete -metric space with constant and let be a continuous self-mapping on . Let and be real numbers such that . Assume that there exists such that for all **
where is satisfied in conditions and . Then, has a fixed point ; that is, .*

*Proof. *Choose . Set
If there exists such that , the proof is complete. So we assume that
So from the assumption of theorem, we have
and hence
Since , we get

So from , we conclude that
Therefore, is a decreasing sequence of real numbers which is bounded from below. Therefore, converges and
We will show that . Arguing by contradiction, we assume . For every , there exists , such that
Hence, from , we get

On the other hand (57), we have
So from assumption of theorem, we obtain
and hence

Since , we get

Also from (57), we have , and thus, by assumption of theorem, we have
and therefore,
Since , we get

Now by using (64) and continuing similar method as used in (68) and (71), we obtain

This implies that
So from (), we have , so that there exists such that
and so from (56) we get

This is a contradiction with definition of . So, and from (62) we have

Now, we claim that
Arguing by contradiction, we assume that there exist and sequences and of natural numbers such that
So

From (76), there exists such that

It follows from (79) and (80) that
So, from , we obtain

On the other hand from (78), we have
Hence, from (82) and assumption of theorem, we have

Using (79) and , we obtain

Thus, from this and , we get

This is contradiction with relation (78). Hence, . By completeness of , there exists such that
Since is continuous, we get
Since , therefore and hence .

Theorem 15. *Let be complete -metric space with constant and let be a continuous self-mapping on . Assume that there exists such that for all **
where is satisfied in conditions and . Then, has a fixed point ; that is, .*

*Proof. *By taking and in Theorem 14, the proof is complete.

Theorem 16. *Let be complete metric space and let be a continuous self-mapping on . Let and be real numbers such that . Assume that there exists such that for all **
where is satisfied in conditions and . Then, has a fixed point ; that is, .*

*Proof. *It is sufficient to take in Theorem 14.

Theorem 17. *Let be complete metric space and let be a continuous self-mapping on . Assume that there exists such that for all **
where is satisfied in conditions and . Then, has a unique fixed point ; that is, .*

*Proof. *Since every metric space is a -metric space with constant , from Theorem 15 has a fixed point . Indeed, if there is another fixed point of , such that , therefore . Since , from assumption of theorem we obtain
This is contradiction. So has a unique fixed point.

*Remark 18. *Theorem 17 gives all consequence of Theorem 2.1 of [12] without assumption used by [12]. Notice also that the results in [12] can be also concluded from the main theorem in [13] that is also a proper extension of the results in [12] in different aspect, more precisely, in complete metric-like spaces.

#### Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

#### Acknowledgment

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, under Grant no. 5513035HiCi. The authors, therefore, acknowledge the technical and financial support of KAU.

#### References

- S. Czerwik, “Contraction mappings in $b$-metric spaces,”
*Acta Mathematica et Informatica Universitatis Ostraviensis*, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - I. A. Bakhtin, “The contraction mapping principle in quasimetric spaces,”
*Funct.Anal., Unianowsk Gos.Ped.Inst.*, vol. 30, pp. 26–37, 1989. View at Google Scholar - N. Bourbaki,
*Topologie Gnrale*, Herman, Paris, France, 1974. - H. Aydi, M.-F. Bota, E. Karapınar, and S. Moradi, “A common fixed point for weak -phi-contractions on b-metric spaces,”
*Fixed Point Theory*, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 337–346, 2012. View at Google Scholar - M.-F. Bota, C. Chifu, and E. Karapınar, “Fixed point theorems for generalized (alpha
^{*}-psi)-Ciric-type contractive multivalued operators in b-metric spaces,” Submitted. - M.-F. Bota, E. Karapınar, and O. Mlesnite, “Ulam-Hyers stability results for fixed point problems via $\alpha $-$\psi $-contractive mapping in ($b$)-metric space,”
*Abstract and Applied Analysis*, vol. 2013, Article ID 825293, 6 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - M.-F. Bota and E. Karapınar, “A note on ‘Some results on multi-valued weakly jungck mappings in b-metric space’,”
*Central European Journal of Mathematics*, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1711–1712, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - M. A. Kutbi, E. Karapınar, J. Ahmad, and A. Azam, “Some fixed point results for multi-valued mappings in
*b*-metric spaces,”*Journal of Inequalities and Applications*, vol. 2014, article 126, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - S. Czerwik, “Nonlinear set-valued contraction mappings in b-metric spaces,”
*Atti del Seminario Matematico e Fisico dell'Università di Modena*, vol. 46, pp. 263–276, 1998. View at Google Scholar - J. Heinonen,
*Lectures on Analysis on Metric Spaces*, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - M. Bota, A. Molnar, and C. Varga, “On Ekeland's variational principle in $b$-metric spaces,”
*Fixed Point Theory*, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - D. Wardowski, “Fixed points of a new type of contractive mappings in complete metric spaces,”
*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*, vol. 2012, article 94, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - H. Alsulami, E. Karapınar, and H. Piri, “Fixed points of modified F-contractive mappings in complete metric-like spaces,”
*Journal of Function Spaces*. In press.