Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2016, Article ID 6507104, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6507104
Research Article

A Mathematical Model of Communication with Reputational Concerns

1School of Public Finance and Taxation, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 555 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China
2School of Securities and Futures, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 555 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China
3School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 555 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, China

Received 29 January 2016; Accepted 9 March 2016

Academic Editor: Christos K. Volos

Copyright © 2016 Ce Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Ottaviani and P. N. Sørensen, “Reputational cheap talk,” The RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 155–175, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Bourjade and B. Jullien, “The roles of reputation and transparency on the behavior of biased experts,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 575–594, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Sobel, “A theory of credibility,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 557–573, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. R. Benabou and G. Laroque, “Using privileged information to manipulate markets: insiders, gurus, and credibility,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 921–958, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. W. Li, “Peddling influence through intermediaries,” American Economic Review, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 1136–1162, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Morris, “Political correctness,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 231–265, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus