Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 6590517, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6590517
Research Article

Adaptive Terminal Sliding Mode NDO-Based Control of Underactuated AUV in Vertical Plane

College of Automation, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China

Received 22 August 2015; Accepted 14 December 2015

Academic Editor: Driss Boutat

Copyright © 2016 Wei Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The depth tracking issue of underactuated autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) in vertical plane is addressed in this paper. Considering the complicated dynamics and kinematics model for underactuated AUV, a more simplified model is obtained based on assumptions. Then a nonlinear disturbance observer (NDO) is presented to estimate the external disturbance acting on AUV, and an adaptive terminal sliding mode control (ATSMC) based on NDO is applied to enhance the depth tracking performance of underactuated AUV considering both internal and external disturbance. Compared with the traditional sliding mode controller, the static error and chattering problem of the depth tracking process have been clearly improved by adopting NDO-based ATSMC. The stability of control system is proven to be guaranteed according to Lyapunov theory. In the end, simulation results imply that the proposed controller owns strong robustness and satisfied control effectiveness in comparison with the traditional controller.

1. Introduction

Autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) is a kind of underwater vehicles with onboard power supply and intelligence. Due to its autonomous ability, AUV has become a very hot research topic in the past few decades for its wide applications in ocean scientific survey, emergency rescue, and military mission, such as gas and mine sources detection, marine environment research, and observation and manipulation task of military [13]. Traditionally, fully actuated AUVs are applied to underwater missions in the ocean. The trait of fully actuated AUVs is that the number of actuators equals degrees of freedom (DOF). However, with the development of ocean equipment, underactuated AUVs play more and more important role in marine tasks, whose degrees of freedom (DOF) are more than actual control inputs. In practical occasions, many AUVs are actually underactuated as they lack thrusters or other actuators in the heave or sway directions, and when the actuator failures of fully actuated AUVs occur, they will also transform into underactuated states. A significant advantage for underactuated AUV is that its own weight can be decreased due to less actuators and sensors. However, these underactuated AUVs bring a challenging control issue considering their lack of actuators. Furthermore, they own highly coupled and strongly nonlinear kinematic and dynamic models [4]. Therefore, various controllers for underactuated AUV need to estimate and deal with uncertainties, hydrodynamic effects, inherent nonlinearity, and so on.

Trajectory tracking in the vertical plane is one of the essential research problems for underactuated AUVs; many researchers have concentrated upon this control problem. Subudhi et al. [2] proposed an output feedback controller to complete AUV’s path tracking task in its vertical plane according to a linearized motion model. Cristi et al. [5] applied sliding mode approach to overcome dynamical uncertainties of AUV in a diving maneuver; Lapierre [6] presented a robust diving control technique based on adaptive backstepping technique and switching schemes, which could meet the robustness requirement; Naik and Singh [7] treated the suboptimal control issue of underactuated AUV by using SDRE technique, and AUV showed satisfactory performance in spite of system’s uncertainties and other constraints. Loc et al. [8] used an analytical method based on sliding mode control technique to obtain the optimal trajectory for unmanned underwater vehicle, which made the vehicle follow the desired trajectory as well. Adhami-Mirhosseini et al. [9] put forward a controller combining Fourier series and pseudo-spectral thoughts to solve the bottom tracking problems for AUV. Lakhekar et al. constructed an enhanced dynamic fuzzy SMC to improve the control performance of AUV’s depth following mission [10].

Sliding mode control (SMC) is noticed for its strong robustness against various disturbances and uncertainties in the application of controllers [11]. Due to this, SMC has been widely used by many researchers in different systems [1214], such as the inverted-pendulum control systems, and motion control systems for underwater vehicles. Jia et al. [15] built an iterative nonlinear sliding mode (INSM) controller to achieve bottom-following of underactuated AUV; Lakhekar and Saundarmal [16] introduced a novel fuzzy sliding mode controller for AUV’s depth control task. SMC can handle system’s uncertainties in a robust way. However, SMC is limited for its dependence on the plant model. To overcome this disadvantage, lots of controllers based on adaptive thoughts are introduced. Adaptive control algorithm is an efficient way to enhance the performance of AUV’s tracking controllers [17]. Antonelli et al. [18] proposed an adaptive controller for ODIN AUV; Yu et al. [19] used adaptive technique on the basis of neural networks to control AUV; Zhang et al. [20] constructed an adaptive output feedback controller combined with DRFNN method to realize the tracking control target of AUV. Disturbance is another key factor which affects AUV, and it is always unpredictable, nonperiodic, and even highly nonlinear. Nonlinear disturbance observer (NDO) [21] is an effective method to reduce the bad influence of unknown external disturbance on the plant. Accounting for this, NDO has been widely applied into estimating and compensating disturbances in many areas, such as manipulators and motors [22, 23]. The application of NDO in underactuated AUV is crucial to handle with the unexpected condition in presence of disturbance.

In this paper, an adaptive sliding mode controller based on NDO is introduced to solve the depth tracking problems of AUV. Firstly, the mathematical model of underactuated AUV in the vertical plane is described and simplified. Secondly, a NDO is built with reference to the above AUV’s model, and an adaptive terminal sliding mode control (ATSMC) method considering NDO is presented as well. The system’s stability is proven by choosing appropriate Lyapunov functions in the controller’s construction process. Finally, the simulation experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed controller, and the robustness of underactuated AUV’s depth tracking in the vertical plane is shown in the case of external disturbance.

2. Mathematical Model of Underactuated AUV

The frame coordinate systems’ schematic drawing for the mathematical model of underactuated AUV is shown in Figure 1; the reference frame is fixed on the earth, wherein , , and are the roll angle, pitch angle, and yaw angle, respectively, in this reference frame; the body-fixesd reference frame is fixed on the underactuated AUV; its origin is located at AUV’s center of buoyancy, wherein , and are the surge velocity, sway velocity, heave velocity, roll angular velocity, pitch angular velocity, and yaw angular velocity, respectively, in the body-fixed reference frame.

Figure 1: Coordinate systems of underactuated AUV.

As underactuated AUV is a highly nonlinear and coupled system, its kinematics and dynamics equations in the vertical plane are constituted of a few nonlinear equations, which can be expressed in the following forms [7]: where is the inertial movement of AUV about the pitch axis , is the mass of AUV, , are the coordinates of AUV’s mass center and buoyancy center, respectively, in the body-fixed frame , is the diving depth of AUV in the frame , is the weight of AUV, is the buoyancy of AUV in the water, is the disturbance from the outside environment, is the rudder input, are the coefficients of rudder, and ,,,,,,,,,,, are the hydrodynamics coefficients of AUV.

Aiming at simplifying the controller design for underactuated AUV, the effect of heave velocity is neglected by assuming ; according to the definition of body-fixed frame , it is obvious that . It is assumed that the surge velocity keeps a constant value as with the help of main thruster mechanism. Define and ; the previous equations would be replaced by a new one:where ,  ,,, ,, and is regarded as internal disturbance of state equations,  , and is regarded as external disturbance of state equations, which is also the main disturbance for the system.

3. Terminal Sliding Mode Control Based on NDO

3.1. Nonlinear Disturbance Observer Design

The main disturbance for the underactuated AUV is external disturbance ; for the purpose of eliminating its effect on the motion of AUV, it is necessary to predict the changing tend. This thought is transformed into estimating in the progress of constructing controller. Assume is the estimation value of , is the estimation value of , and, obviously, . Define state variable vector ; according to (2), a vector-form state equation is obtained [24, 25]:where

Define is the internal state variable of NDO; then a nonlinear disturbance observer can be constructed as below:where can be designed as under the condition that .

Define . In fact, there is seldom or even no prior knowledge about the changing law of . Only when the changing speed of is slower compared with whole system’s dynamic traits, it is preferable to assume the derivative of satisfies .

From (5), we can obtain

Then can be gotten as

From (7), the value of converges to zero due to the fact that .

3.2. Adaptive Terminal Sliding Mode Control

The overall schematic drawing for the NDO-based terminal sliding mode control method is presented in Figure 2. Considering is available, (2) can be rewritten as where .

Figure 2: The structure of NDO-based terminal sliding mode control for AUV.

Let us define the estimation of is , and . According to the same principle of getting the derivate law of , assuming varies more slowly compared to the system dynamics, then we have , and in further step.

The following task is to design sliding surfaces for this controller construction based on the basic idea of backstepping strategy. In order to follow the desired depth trajectory, the first sliding surface is defined as

Considering that is another equivalent internal disturbance in the state equations, it is necessary to estimate its value as well. Define as the estimation of , and . can be obtained by introducing the following adaptive control law, as shown in (10). Consider

Aiming at eliminating the static error of depth tracking, an integral part relative to is necessarily included:

Choose a Lyapunov function as

Define a virtual input as

Define the second sliding surface and choose a Lyapunov function separately as

Define a virtual input and the tracking error of pitch angular velocity separately as

Then a novel terminal sliding mode surface is constructed aswhere , ,  all of them are positive constant, and the definition of is ; ;

In order to obtain the change rule of , the adaptive law of is built as

According to above adaptive laws and sliding mode surfaces design process, the control input of rudder is finally established as below:where , and this weighted integral section is designed to reduce the chattering phenomenon of traditional sliding mode control.

Define a Lyapunov function which includes the NDO part and terminal sliding surface as

3.3. Stability Analysis of System

To study the convergence of depth trajectory, each sliding mode surface of controller should be analyzed. These positive definite Lyapunov functions constructed as are discussed in detail to study sliding mode surfaces’ convergent issues, and their derivatives with respect to time can be obtained as

If , we can conclude that , which means gradually converges to zero. Then the next step is to study

In the same way, if , then we can conclude that , which means gradually converges to zero as well. From (17), it is easy to know that is equivalent to ; the key point is to verify the convergence of terminal sliding mode surface .

From (8), (13), (15), (17), and (19), we can obtain

From (7), (18), and (23), we can obtain

Considering the fact that , it is easy to know that terminal sliding mode surface is reachable. Once , we can know that will converge rapidly to zero in a finite period. Due to (22), converges to zero as well when ; and once , it implies that converges to zero quickly. All above analysis proves that all closed-loop sliding mode surfaces will converge to the equilibrium points in finite time.

4. Simulation Experiment

In this section, simulations are presented to verify the effectiveness of designed controller, which is ATSMC with NDO. The method is applied into the depth control of REMUS AUV. REMUS is a small-size, low-cost moving platform applied into various oceanographic activities; it is developed by both Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. The parameters about REMUS can be obtained from [7]; here some parameters which will be used in this paper are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1: Hydrodynamic parameters of REMUS AUV.
Table 2: Physical parameters of REMUS AUV.

Case 1. In order to undergo the simulation, due to Section 3, the parameters of NDO are chosen as ; the parameters of ATSMC are set as ,,,,,, , , , , , and. The initial values of state variables are for the REMUS AUV. The external disturbance exposed on REMUS is assumed to be in the following form during the time period . The surge velocity holds constant with m/s. The desired depth of AUV is defined as a time varying function . The task of the designed ATSMC based on NDO is to achieve the depth trajectory tracking of REMUS AUV in reference to desired depth .
Figure 3 shows the depth tracking process of underactuated AUV, and the changing trend of rudder control input . We can obtain that the tracking error of depth can be nearly zero in the stable procedure, even when the AUV suffers from unknown external disturbance during . All these verify that the AUV could meet depth tracking requirements. In addition, the control input obtained from the proposed method is smooth, and its chattering phenomenon is seldom vanished.
Figure 4 implies the changing trends of variables during the depth tracking process. It is easy to notice that the pitch angle and pitch angle velocity are both forced to be in the scope of a small value; besides, the heave velocity keeps almost as close to zero in the overall process, which satisfies the assumption that .
The main disturbance for AUV is external disturbance . To reduce external disturbance’s effect on AUV, the proposed controller introduces the NDO to observe and predict . Another important relationship is ; it is convenient to estimate based on NDO in the controller design. We can have the observation value due to NDO from Figure 5. Another part of disturbance is the constructed internal disturbance which is established for convenience of designing proposed controller. An adaptive law for is also introduced to accelerate the convergent speed of controller; its estimation process is shown in Figure 6.
The traits of sliding mode surfaces in the controller building procedure are vital to the convergence of the whole control system. The internal relationships between each sliding mode surface can be known from Section 3.3. The change laws of sliding mode surfaces are shown in Figure 7; we can know that sliding mode surfaces converge to equilibrium points. Another important aspect is the terminal sliding mode surface , which can be reachable from Figure 8. guarantees the convergence of . From (19) and Figure 9, we can understand that weighted value is used to weaken the chattering issue which occurs frequently in the traditional sliding mode control, and its value changes with , and apparently no strong oscillation happens to the rudder in the tracking procedure from Figure 3.

Figure 3: Depth trajectory and rudder input of REMUS AUV.
Figure 4: State variables changing trend of REMUS AUV.
Figure 5: External disturbance and its observation value .
Figure 6: Internal disturbance and its estimation .
Figure 7: Sliding mode surfaces .
Figure 8: Terminal sliding mode surface .
Figure 9: Weighted value of .

Case 2. In order to compare with the proposed method, a traditional sliding mode controller and a proposed controller which lacks integer part in (11) are separately applied into accomplishing the depth tracking task. Their control performances are shown, respectively, in Figures 10 and 11. Among them, the traditional sliding mode control law [26] can be expressed with the expression of (19) when . Through comparing the performance shown in Figure 3 with Figure 10, it is obvious that and the change rule of play an important role in reducing chattering issue of rudder input; when , the rudder input of the ATSMC based on NDO can make AUV track the desired depth, but a small tracking error always exists by contrasting the control effect of Figure 3 with Figure 11; this illustrates that integer part is necessary to achieve the expected tracking effect.

Figure 10: Traditional sliding mode control method.
Figure 11: ATSMC based on NDO without integer part .

5. Conclusion

A methodology combined with ATSMC and NDO was presented in this paper. For the convenience of design, both the kinematics and dynamics equations of underactuated AUV in the vertical plane were simplified firstly based on some assumptions. Then, a nonlinear disturbance observer (NDO) was built, and another form of AUV’s state variables equation was reconstructed on the basis of NDO. Furthermore, an ATSMC with NDO was designed, and the controller’s stability was verified according to Lyapunov’s theory and backstepping technique. Through the simulation experiments of AUV, the designed controller was proved to make the underactuated AUV track the expected time-varying depth trajectory, and it showed strong robustness to external disturbance.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation (NNSF) of China under Grants 51205074 and 61473095; by Ministry of Science and Technology of China under Grant 2014DFR10010; by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant HEUCF041605; and by Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China under Grant 20112304120007.

References

  1. X. B. Xiang, L. Lapierre, and B. Jouvencel, “Smooth transition of AUV motion control: from fully-actuated to under-actuated configuration,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 67, pp. 14–22, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Subudhi, K. Mukherjee, and S. Ghosh, “A static output feedback control design for path following of autonomous underwater vehicle in vertical plane,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 63, pp. 72–76, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Z. Yan, B. Hao, Y. Liu, and S. Hou, “Movement control in recovering UUV based on two-stage discrete T-S fuzzy model,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2014, Article ID 362787, 11 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. F. Repoulias and E. Papadopoulos, “Three dimensional trajectory control of underactuated AUVs,” in Proceedings of the European Control Conference, pp. 3492–3499, IEEE, Kos, Greece, July 2007.
  5. R. Cristi, F. A. Papoulias, and A. J. Healey, “Adaptive sliding mode control of autonomous underwater vehicles in the dive plane,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 152–160, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Lapierre, “Robust diving control of an AUV,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 92–104, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. S. Naik and S. N. Singh, “State-dependent Riccati equation-based robust dive plane control of AUV with control constraints,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 34, no. 11-12, pp. 1711–1723, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. B. Loc, H.-S. Choi, S.-S. You, and T. N. Huy, “Time optimal trajectory design for unmanned underwater vehicle,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 89, pp. 69–81, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Adhami-Mirhosseini, M. J. Yazdanpanah, and A. P. Aguiar, “Automatic bottom-following for underwater robotic vehicles,” Automatica, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 2155–2162, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. G. V. Lakhekar, L. M. Waghmare, and P. S. Londhe, “Enhanced dynamic fuzzy sliding mode controller for autonomous underwater vehicles,” in Proceeding of the IEEE Underwater Technology (UT '15), pp. 1–7, Chennai, India, February 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. Yang, S. H. Li, J. Y. Su, and X. H. Yu, “Continuous nonsingular terminal sliding mode control for systems with mismatched disturbances,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 2287–2291, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. M. Chen, Q.-X. Wu, and R.-X. Cui, “Terminal sliding mode tracking control for a class of SISO uncertain nonlinear systems,” ISA Transactions, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 198–206, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. I. Fossen and S. I. Sagatun, “Adaptive control of nonlinear systems: a case study of underwater robotic systems,” Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 393–412, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. J. Healey and D. Lienard, “Multivariable sliding mode control for autonomous diving and steering of unmanned underwater vehicles,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 327–339, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H.-M. Jia, L.-J. Zhang, X.-Q. Bian, Z.-P. Yan, X.-Q. Cheng, and J.-J. Zhou, “A nonlinear bottom-following controller for underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles,” Journal of Central South University, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1240–1248, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. V. Lakhekar and V. D. Saundarmal, “Novel adaptive fuzzy sliding mode controller for depth control of an underwater vehicles,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1–7, IEEE, Hyderabad, India, July 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. D. Do, J. Pan, and Z. P. Jiang, “Robust and adaptive path following for underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 31, no. 16, pp. 1967–1997, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Antonelli, S. Chiaverini, N. Sarkar, and M. West, “Adaptive control of an autonomous underwater vehicle: experimental results on ODIN,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 756–765, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J.-C. Yu, A.-Q. Zhang, X.-H. Wang, and L.-J. Su, “Direct adaptive control of underwater vehicles based on fuzzy neural networks,” Acta Automatica Sinica, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 840–846, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L.-J. Zhang, X. Qi, and Y.-J. Pang, “Adaptive output feedback control based on DRFNN for AUV,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 36, no. 9-10, pp. 716–722, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Yang, W.-H. Chen, and S. Li, “Non-linear disturbance observer-based robust control for systems with mismatched disturbances/uncertainties,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 5, no. 18, pp. 2053–2062, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W.-H. Chen, D. J. Ballance, P. J. Gawthrop, and J. O'Reilly, “A nonlinear disturbance observer for robotic manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 932–938, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. X. K. Chen, S. Komada, and T. Fukuda, “Design of a nonlinear disturbance observer,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 429–437, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Mohammed, W. Huo, J. Huang, H. Rifaï, and Y. Amirat, “Nonlinear disturbance observer based sliding mode control of a human-driven knee joint orthosis,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 75, pp. 41–49, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Wu, J. Huang, Y. J. Wang, and K. X. Xing, “Nonlinear disturbance observer-based dynamic surface control for trajectory tracking of pneumatic muscle system,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 440–455, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Y. Hung, W. Gao, and J. C. Hung, “Variable structure control: a survey,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 2–22, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus