Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2016, Article ID 8417643, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8417643
Research Article

Stochastic Portfolio Selection Problem with Reliability Criteria

1Department of Economic Management, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
2State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Received 8 October 2015; Accepted 7 February 2016

Academic Editor: Kamel Barkaoui

Copyright © 2016 Xiangsong Meng and Lixing Yang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Markowitz, “Portfolio selection,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 77–91, 1952. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. H. Markowitz, Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1959.
  3. H. Markowitz, P. Todd, G.-L. Xu, and Y. Yamane, “Computation of mean-semivariance efficient sets by the critical line algorithm,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 45, no. 1–4, pp. 307–317, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. J. Gao, D. Li, X. Cui, and S. Wang, “Time cardinality constrained mean-variance dynamic portfolio selection and market timing: a stochastic control approach,” Automatica, vol. 54, pp. 91–99, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. L. Yi, X. Wu, X. Li, and X. Cui, “A mean-field formulation for optimal multi-period mean-variance portfolio selection with an uncertain exit time,” Operations Research Letters, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 489–494, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. X. Xing, J. Hu, and Y. Yang, “Robust minimum variance portfolio with L-infinity constraints,” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 107–117, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Levy and M. Levy, “The benefits of differential variance-based constraints in portfolio optimization,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 234, no. 2, pp. 372–381, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. M. C. Chiu and H. Y. Wong, “Mean-variance portfolio selection with correlation risk,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 263, pp. 432–444, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. A. Palczewski and J. Palczewski, “Theoretical and empirical estimates of mean-variance portfolio sensitivity,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 234, no. 2, pp. 402–410, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. R. Castellano and R. Cerqueti, “Mean-variance portfolio selection in presence of infrequently traded stocks,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 234, no. 2, pp. 442–449, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. C. Fu, A. Lari-Lavassani, and X. Li, “Dynamic mean-variance portfolio selection with borrowing constraint,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 312–319, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. W.-G. Zhang, X.-L. Zhang, and W.-L. Xiao, “Portfolio selection under possibilistic mean-variance utility and a SMO algorithm,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 693–700, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  13. W.-G. Zhang, Y.-J. Liu, and W.-J. Xu, “A possibilistic mean-semivariance-entropy model for multi-period portfolio selection with transaction costs,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 341–349, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. X. Huang, “Portfolio selection with a new definition of risk,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 186, no. 1, pp. 351–357, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. A. A. Najafi and S. Mushakhian, “Multi-stage stochastic mean-semivariance-CVaR portfolio optimization under transaction costs,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 256, pp. 445–458, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. W. Yan, R. Miao, and S. Li, “Multi-period semi-variance portfolio selection: model and numerical solution,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 128–134, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. S.-C. Yang, T.-L. Lin, T.-J. Chang, and K.-J. Chang, “A semi-variance portfolio selection model for military investment assets,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 2292–2301, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. X. Huang and T. Zhao, “Mean-chance model for portfolio selection based on uncertain measure,” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, vol. 59, pp. 243–250, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. X. Li, Z. Qin, and L. Yang, “A chance-constrained portfolio selection model with risk constraints,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 217, no. 2, pp. 949–951, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1944. View at MathSciNet
  21. T. Xing and X. Zhou, “Reformulation and solution algorithms for absolute and percentile robust shortest path problems,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 943–954, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Huang and S. Gao, “Optimal paths in dynamic networks with dependent random link travel times,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 579–598, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. Yang and X. Zhou, “Constraint reformulation and a Lagrangian relaxation-based solution algorithm for a least expected time path problem,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 59, pp. 22–44, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Yang, Y. Zhang, S. Li, and Y. Gao, “A two-stage stochastic optimization model for the transfer activity choice in metro networks,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 83, pp. 271–297, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J. H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 1975. View at MathSciNet
  26. H. Aytug, M. Khouja, and F. E. Vergara, “Use of genetic algorithms to solve production and operations management problems: a review,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 41, no. 17, pp. 3955–4009, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. S. Chang and S. S. Sim, “Optimising train movements through coast control using genetic algorithms,” IEE Proceedings—Electric Power Applications, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 65–73, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. J.-W. Chung, S.-M. Oh, and I.-C. Choi, “A hybrid genetic algorithm for train sequencing in the Korean railway,” Omega, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 555–565, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. X. Xu, K. Li, L. Yang, and J. Ye, “Balanced train timetabling on a single-line railway with optimized velocity,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 894–909, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus