Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 2768045, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2768045
Research Article

Strategic Uncertainty in Markets for Nonrenewable Resources: A Level- Approach

1Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces, Hamburg, Germany
2WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Armin Fügenschuh

Received 20 June 2017; Revised 16 September 2017; Accepted 18 September 2017; Published 30 October 2017

Academic Editor: Chris Goodrich

Copyright © 2017 Ingmar Vierhaus et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. M. Newbery, “Oil prices, cartels, and the problem of dynamic inconsistency,” The Economic Journal, vol. 91, pp. 617–646, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. G. C. Loury, “A theory of ‘oil’igopoly: cournot equilibrium in exhaustible resource markets with fixed supplies,” International Economic Review, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 285–301, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. S. Polasky, “Do oil producers act as ‘Oil’igopolists?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 216–247, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Salo and O. Tahvonen, “Oligopoly equilibria in nonrenewable resource markets,” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 671–702, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. F. Groot, C. Withagen, and A. de Zeeuw, “Strong time-consistency in the cartel-versus-fringe model,” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 287–306, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. R. S. Pindyck, “Uncertainty and exhaustible resource markets,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 1203–1225, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. B. Reynolds, “Uncertainty in exhaustible natural resource economics: the irreversible sunk costs of Hotelling,” Resources Policy, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 532–541, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. S. Pindyck, “Models of resource markets and the explanation of resource price behaviour,” Energy Economics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 130–139, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Farrow, “Testing the efficiency of extraction from a stock resource,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 452–487, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. D. Spiro, “Resource prices and planning horizons,” Working Paper, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. O. Stahl II and P. W. Wilson, “Experimental evidence on players' models of other players,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 309–327, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. Rosemarie, “Unraveling in guessing games: an experimental study,” American Economic Review, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 1313–1326, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  13. C. F. Camerer, T.-H. Ho, and K. Weigelt, “Iterated Dominance and Iterated Best Response in Experimental P-Beauty Contests,” American Economic Review, vol. 880, no. 4, pp. 947–969, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  14. C. F. Camerer, T.-H. Ho, and J.-K. Chong, “A cognitive hierarchy model of games,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 861–898, 2004, http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1162/0033553041502225. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. R. Mariano, “Bounded rationality in a cournot duopoly game,” Working Paper, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Runco, “What model best describes initial choices in a cournot duopoly experiment?” Working Paper, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  17. R. van Veldhuizen and J. Sonnemans, “Nonrenewable resources, strategic behavior and the hotelling rule,” Working Paper, 2014, https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B75hoVU_9nz1cnBWeDlpcXR0MTg. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. H. Hotelling, “The economics of exhaustible resources,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 137–175, 1931. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. R. M. Solow, “The economics of resources or the resources of economics,” American Economic Review, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  20. T. Achterberg, “SCIP: solving constraint integer programs,” Mathematical Programming Computation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–41, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. A. Fügenschuh, R. Van Veldhuizen, and I. Vierhaus, “Production planning for non-cooperating companies with nonlinear optimization,” in Proceedings of the 11th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, G. Seliger, Ed., pp. 536–541, Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin, 2013.
  22. A. Fügenschuh, I. Vierhaus, and R. van Veldhuizen, “Strategic uncertainty in non-renewable resource markets: a level-k approach,” Tech. Rep. Angewandte Mathematik und Optimierung Schriftenreihe AMOS#35, Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, 2015. View at Google Scholar