Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 2870420, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2870420
Research Article

A New Method for Solving Multiobjective Bilevel Programs

1Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 516 Jungong Road, Shanghai 200093, China
2College of Science, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Ying Ji; moc.621@1891_gniyij

Received 14 May 2016; Revised 15 August 2016; Accepted 28 December 2016; Published 23 March 2017

Academic Editor: Kamel Barkaoui

Copyright © 2017 Ying Ji et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Dempe, “Annotated bibliography on bilevel programming and mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints,” Optimization, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 333–359, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. H. Bonnel, “Optimality conditions for the semivectorial bilevel optimization problem,” Pacific Journal of Optimization, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 447–467, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. H. Bonnel and J. Morgan, “Semivectorial bilevel optimization problem: penalty approach,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 365–382, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. B. Liu, Z. Wan, J. Chen, and G. Wang, “Optimality conditions for pessimistic semivectorial bilevel programming problems,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2014, article no. 41, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Zheng and Z. P. Wan, “A solution method for semivectorial bilevel programming problem via penalty method,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, vol. 37, no. 1-2, pp. 207–219, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. A. Ben-Tal, A. Goryashko, E. Guslitzer, and A. Nemirovski, “Adjustable robust solutions of uncertain linear programs,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 351–376, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. V. Jeyakumar, G. M. Lee, and G. Li, “Characterizing robust solution sets of convex programs under data uncertainty,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 407–435, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. M. Ehrgott, Multicriteria Optimization, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 2005. View at MathSciNet
  9. S. Y. Wang, “Existence of a Pareto equilibrium,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 373–384, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. J. Yu and G. X. Yuan, “The study of Pareto equilibria for multiobjective games by fixed point and Ky Fan minimax inequality methods,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 17–24, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. E. Tsiporkova and V. Boeva, “Multi-step ranking of alternatives in a multi-criteria and multi-expert decision making environment,” Information Sciences, vol. 176, no. 18, pp. 2673–2697, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  12. P. J. H. Schoemaker and C. C. Waid, “An experimental comparison of different approaches to determining weights in additive utility models,” Management Science, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 182–196, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Weber and K. Borcherding, “Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Yin, “Multi-objective bilevel optimization for transportation planning and management problems,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 93–105, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Deb and A. Sinha, Solving Bilevel Multi-Objective Optimization Problems Using Evolutionary Algorithms, Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Springer, 2009.
  16. C. O. Pieume, P. Marcotte, L. P. Fotso, and P. Siarry, “Solving bilevel linear multiobjective programming problems,” American Journal of Operations Research, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 214–219, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. G. Eichfelder, “Multiobjective bilevel optimization,” Mathematical Programming. A Publication of the Mathematical Programming Society, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 419–449, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Ji, S. J. Qu, and Z. S. Yu, “Bi-level multi-objective optimization model for last mile delivery using a discrete approach,” Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. H. I. Calvete and C. Galé, “Linear bilevel programs with multiple objectives at the upper level,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 234, no. 4, pp. 950–959, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. H. I. Calvete and C. Galé, “On linear bilevel problems with multiple objectives at the lower level,” Omega, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Hu and S. Mehrotra, “Robust and stochastically weighted multiobjective optimization models and reformulations,” Operations Research, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 936–953, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. J.-B. Jian, J.-L. Li, and X.-D. Mo, “A strongly and superlinearly convergent SQP algorithm for optimization problems with linear complementarity constraints,” Applied Mathematics and Optimization, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 17–46, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. M. C. Ferris and T. S. Munson, “Complementarity problems in GAMS and the PATH solver,” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 165–188, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. S. P. Dierkse, Robust solution of mixed complementarity problems [Ph.D. thesis], University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis, USA, 1994.
  25. X. Hu and D. Ralph, “Using EPECs to model bilevel games in restructured electricity markets with locational prices,” Operations Research, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 809–827, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  26. T. L. Saaty, “The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: the AHP/ANP approach,” Operations Research, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1101–1118, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus