Research Article
Multifractal Analysis of Hydrologic Data Using Wavelet Methods and Fluctuation Analysis
Table 8
The results of MF-DFA and WLMF for 10 sites.
| | MF-DFA | WLBMF | | | ’s errors bars | a | b | | a | b | |
| Site 1 | 0.88 | 0.069 | 0.40 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.48 | 0.97 | 1.00 | Site 2 | 1.10 | 0.043 | 0.39 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.39 | 0.66 | 0.76 | Site 3 | 0.90 | 0.040 | 0.34 | 0.66 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.83 | 1.66 | Site 4 | 0.89 | 0.028 | 0.30 | 0.67 | 1.17 | 0.36 | 0.87 | 1.27 | Site 5 | 0.92 | 0.014 | 0.26 | 0.70 | 1.44 | 0.26 | 0.83 | 1.66 | Site 6 | 0.95 | 0.029 | 0.26 | 0.63 | 1.27 | 0.32 | 0.77 | 1.26 | Site 7 | 0.88 | 0.039 | 0.37 | 0.66 | 0.82 | 0.52 | 0.86 | 0.73 | Site 8 | 0.99 | 0.018 | 0.16 | 0.63 | 1.99 | 0.19 | 0.95 | 2.28 | Site 9 | 1.20 | 0.027 | 0.29 | 0.54 | 0.88 | 0.35 | 0.64 | 0.87 | Site 10 | 1.37 | 0.017 | 0.25 | 0.46 | 0.85 | 0.30 | 0.53 | 0.81 |
|
|
Note. Since the MF-DFA and WLMF fail to estimate for at Site 7, the fitting results at Site 7 are based on values of when .
|