#### Abstract

Our main purpose is to consider the existence of positive solutions for three-order two-point boundary value problem in the following form: where , and are given constants satisfying . Some inequality conditions on guaranteeing the existence and nonexistence of positive solutions are presented. Our discussion is based on the fixed point theorem in cones.

#### 1. Introduction and Preliminaries

We consider the existence of positive solutions for the following two-point BVP:where . , , and are given constants satisfying .

BVPs play an important role in many branches of mathematics, physics, and engineering and have been a focus in tens of years. They have special importance in the theory and applications, and significant progress has been made on the existence, multiplicity, and nonexistence of positive solutions. Many methods and theorems based on the fixed point theory on cone, the upper and lower solution, Mawhinâ€™s coincidence degree, and variational method and so on have been employed commonly in recent years to show the existence of positive or multiple positive solutions [1â€“9]. For example, Chu and Zhou [3] studied the boundary value problem:Here, is a positive constant and the nonlinearity may be singular at . The proof relies on a nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder type and on Krasnoselskii fixed point theorem on compression and expansion of cones. In [5], Cabada investigated the solvability of two-point BVP:where is an th-order linear operator and is a CarathĂ©odory function. By using the method of lower and upper solutions, the existence results are obtained.

As far as the author knows, however, there are no results which contain the existence criteria of positive solutions to problem (1) with delay. Since the time delays in some equations with practical application background are often very small, they are easier to miss. As we know, even a small delay is also likely to have an important impact on the stability of the system. Therefore it is necessary for us to consider the influence of delays. Our work is based on such a background. Motivated by this fact, we will study mainly this problem here. By using fixed point theorem, we obtain some new results. The interest is that the result (Theorem 2) is related to the deviating argument . Meanwhile, we give an example to demonstrate our result.

Our main results will hinge on an application of the Leggett-Williams fixed point theorem. For the convenience of the reader, we include here the necessary definitions from cone theory in Banach space.

Throughout this paper, the sign stands for deviation operation; namely, . Let be given and suppose that satisfies; for all ; for all ;.

Greenâ€™s function for BVP (1) is Suppose that is a solution of BVP (1); we have

Since , there exists an interval such that Thus .

Next we state the Leggett-Williams fixed point theorem.

Lemma 1 (see [6]). *Let be a completely continuous operator and let be a nonnegative continuous concave functional on such that for all . Suppose that there exist such that *(a)* and for ,*(b)* for ,*(c)* for with **Then has at least three fixed points , and such that and with *

#### 2. Main Result

Theorem 2. *Suppose that conditions , , and hold. Then BVP (1) has at least three positive solutions , , and such that , , , and .*

*Proof. *Let denote the Banach space with the norm and define the cone byLet be the nonnegative continuous concave functional and let be the operatorIt is easy to see that is completely continuous and is an element of . Since , we have .

Choose and ; then From , there exist two positive constants and with such that If we take , then Let and ; from (10) we get So and is completely continuous. From (8), condition (a) of Leggett-Williams theorem is satisfied.

Choose ; then Therefore, condition (b) is satisfied.

Choose and ; then So, if , then , which implies that condition (c) is also satisfied. An application of Leggett-Williams fixed point theorem yields the result.

Theorem 3. *Suppose that conditions , , and hold; then BVP (1) has at least three positive solutions , and such that , , , and .*

The proof of Theorem 3 is similar to that of Theorem 2 and is hence omitted.

*Remark 4. *The extensions to Theorem 2 can be obtained by Theorem 5, where of ) and ( is replaced by and , respectively. We omit the detail.

Theorem 5. *Suppose that conditions *â€‰*â€‰â€‰,*â€‰*â€‰â€‰,*â€‰*and hold.**Then BVP (1) has at least three positive solutions; here .*

Now we present a result on the nonexistence of positive solutions of BVP (1).

Theorem 6. *BVP (1) has no positive solutions if *(i)*;*(ii)*;*(iii)*; or*(iv)*,**where is defined by .*

*Proof. *(a) From condition (i), there exist two positive constants and with such that If we take , then Assume that BVP (1) has a positive solution with . Then is a fixed point of the map defined by and hence which is a contradiction.

(b) From condition (ii), there exist two positive constants and with such that If we take , then Assume that BVP (1) has a positive solution with . Then is a fixed point of the map defined by and hence which is a contradiction.

(c) Assume that BVP (1) has a positive solution with . Then is a fixed point of the map and hence which is a contradiction.

(d) The proof of case (iii) is similar to that of case (iv) and is hence omitted.

*Remark 7. *The extensions to Theorem 6 can be obtained by Theorem 8, where of (i)â€“(iv) is replaced by , and , respectively. Here . We omit the detail.

Theorem 8. *BVP (1) has no positive solutions if *(i)*;*(ii)*;*(iii)*; or*(iv)*,**where is defined by .*

*Example 9. *Let us consider the following equation:where Let , , , and ; then we have , , and for all , for all , and . One can easily see that assumptions , and hold. So by applying Theorem 2, BVP (21) has at least three positive solutions , and and satisfied , , , and

*Example 10. *Let us consider the following equation:(1) Let ; it is clear that Therefore, by applying Theorem 6(i), BVP (23) has no positive solutions.

(2) Let ; it is clear that Therefore, by applying Theorem 6(ii), BVP (23) has no positive solutions.

The numerical results of Example 10 by Mathematica 7.0 are in the following:

*Remark 11. *From the above example, we see that the result is related to the deviating argument , which is different from the Theorem in papers [1â€“3, 5, 6, 10] and the references therein. The studies indicate that this kind of system with time delays can exhibit triple positive solutions, which shows that three-order two-point boundary value problems have the potential to reproduce the complex dynamics of real applied background in mechanics, engineering, physics, and so on.

*Remark 12. *The above problem can be extended to the corresponding vector case. For example, where , , , and and are two given parameters. However, if , such equation is a singular perturbation system; it is hard to obtain the positive solution of (27) by using the fixed point theorem.

#### Disclosure

The author carried out the main part of this article and the main theorem. The author read and approved the final manuscript.

#### Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

#### Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 11401385).