Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2017, Article ID 4673262, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4673262
Research Article

Socioeconomic Drivers of Environmental Pollution in China: A Spatial Econometric Analysis

1School of Economics & Trade, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410079, China
2Hunan University of Finance and Economics, Changsha, Hunan Province 410025, China
3School of Hydraulic Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan Province 410114, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Runchu Wei; moc.361@uhcnuriew

Received 20 April 2017; Accepted 11 June 2017; Published 3 August 2017

Academic Editor: Ricardo López-Ruiz

Copyright © 2017 Jianmin Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC), China Statistical Yearbook 2011, China Statistical Press, Beijing, China, 2011.
  2. B. Xu and B. Lin, “How industrialization and urbanization process impacts on CO2 emissions in China: evidence from nonparametric additive regression models,” Energy Economics, vol. 48, pp. 188–202, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. Chen, “Economic growth and the environment,” in Proceeding of the Annual Conference on Development and Change, Cape Town, 2007.
  4. World Bank, World Development Indicators 2006, World Bank Publications, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. International Energy Agency, Key World Energy Statistics, International Energy Agency, 2009.
  6. Q. Zhang and R. Crooks, Toward an environmentally sustainable future: Country environmental analysis of the People's Republic of China, 2012.
  7. K. Zhang, J. Wang, and X. cui, “Fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution: from the perspective of carbon emission,” in China Industrial Economics, vol. 10, pp. 65–75, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. Lopez, G. I. Galinato, and A. Islam, “Fiscal spending and the environment: theory and empirics,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 180–198, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Q. Li, J. Song, E. Wang, H. Hu, J. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “Economic growth and pollutant emissions in China: a spatial econometric analysis,” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 429–442, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Peng and Q. Bao, “China's economic growth and environmental pollution: an empirical test based on generalized impulse response function,” China Industrial Economy, vol. 5, pp. 15–23, 2006 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  11. J. Acharyya, “FDI, Growth and the Environment: Evidence from India on CO2 Emission during the last two decades,” Journal of economic development, vol. 34, no. 1, p. 43, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. M. Dean, M. E. Lovely, and H. Wang, “Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China,” Journal of Development Economics, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. W. E. Oates, Fiscal federalism, Books, 1972.
  14. J. A. List and S. Gerking, “Regulatory federalism and environmental protection in the United States,” Journal of Regional Science, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 453–471, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. L. Millimet, “Assessing the empirical impact of environmental federalism,” Journal of Regional Science, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 711–733, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. B. Cutter and J. R. DeShazo, “The environmental consequences of decentralizing the decision to decentralize,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 32–53, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. C. D. Silva and A. J. Caplan, “Transboundary pollution control in federal systems,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 173–186, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Kunce and J. F. Shogren, “Efficient decentralized fiscal and environmental policy: a dual purpose Henry George tax,” Ecological Economics, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 569–573, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Sigman, “International spillovers and water quality in rivers: do countries free ride?” National Bureau of Economic Research, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. H. Sigman, “Transboundary spillovers and decentralization of environmental policies,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 82–101, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. Sigman, “Decentralization and environmental quality: an international analysis of water pollution,” National Bureau of Economic Research w13098, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. X. Xianxiang, W. Xianbin, and S. Yuan, “Local official and economic growth,” Economic Research Journal, vol. 9, pp. 18–31, 2007 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Kunrong and F. Wenlin, “Tax competition, region game and their efficiency of growth,” Economic Research Journal, vol. 6, pp. 16–26, 2006 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  24. F. Yong and Z. Yan, “Chinese-style decentralization and fiscal expenditure structure bias: the cost for growth and competitive,” Management World, vol. 3, pp. 4–12, 2007 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  25. Y. Ruilong, Q. Zhang, and Z. Yean, “Fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution: evidence from data on province level in China,” in The Macro-Economic Report, School of Economics, Renmin University of China, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  26. L. Meng, “Fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution: amendments to the Environmental Kuznets hypothesis,” Economic Review, vol. 5, pp. 54–59, 2009 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  27. Y. Wen-Juan and Z. Mao-Chu, “Can Chinese-style fiscal decentralization increase environmental pollution,” in Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, vol. 6, pp. 32–37, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  28. L. Jinru, “Fiscal decentralization, FDI and pollution haven hypothesis: based on study of provincial dynamic panel data,” Statistics & Information Forum, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 60–65, 2013 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  29. C. Fang, D. Yang, and W. Mei-yan, “The political economy of emission in China: will a low carbon growth be incentive compatible in next decade and beyond?” in Economic Research Journal, vol. 6, pp. 4–12, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  30. A. John and R. Pecchenino, “An overlapping generations model of growth and the environment,” Economic Journal, vol. 104, no. 427, pp. 1393–1410, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Dasgupta, B. Laplante, H. Wang, and D. Wheeler, “Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 147–168, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. W. Beckerman, “Economic growth and the environment: whose growth? whose environment?” World Development, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 481–496, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. B. Copeland and M. S. Taylor, “Trade, Tragedy, and the Commons,” National Bureau of Economic Research w10836, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. G. Grossman and A. Krueger, “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement,” National Bureau of Economic Research w3914, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. G. Grossman and A. Krueger, “Economic Growth and the Environment,” National Bureau of Economic Research w4634, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. R. S. Franklin and M. Ruth, “Growing up and cleaning up: the environmental Kuznets curve redux,” Applied Geography, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Roca, E. Padilla, M. Farré, and V. Galletto, “Economic growth and atmospheric pollution in spain: Discussing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis,” Ecological Economics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 85–99, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Dinda, “Environmental kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey,” Ecological Economics, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 431–455, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Tamazian and B. R. Rao, “Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies,” Energy Economics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 137–145, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. R. Chowdhury and E. F. Moran, “Turning the curve: a critical review of Kuznets approaches,” Applied Geography, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. L. Jianmin, X. Chen, and W. Jinguang, “Fiscal decentralization, governmental competition and environmental pollution: heterogeneity and dynamic effects analysis based on panel data of 272 cities,” in Public Finance Research, vol. 9, pp. 36–43, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  42. X. Helian and D. Yuping, “Does Foreign Direct Investment Lead to Environmental Pollution in China?” Management World, vol. 2, pp. 36–49, 2012 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  43. Y. Wanping, “Dynamic of comprehensive evaluation of china’s provincial pollution and research on influencing factors,” Economic Management, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 159–165, 2010 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  44. P. A. P. Moran, “The interpretation of statistical maps,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, vol. 10, pp. 243–251, 1948. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  45. S. Chakravorty, J. Koo, and S. V. Lall, “Metropolitan industrial clusters: patterns and processes,” in World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, vol. 3073, pp. 1–35, 1-35, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  46. C. Li and Z. Zhang, “Spatial statistics analysis of regional environmental pollution in China,” Energy Procedia, vol. 5, pp. 163–168, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. G. Chi and J. Zhu, “Spatial regression models for demographic analysis,” Population Research and Policy Review, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 17–42, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. LeSage and R. K. Pace, Introduction to Spatial Econometrics, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  49. L. Anselin, “The Moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association,” Spatial Analytical Perspectives on GIS, vol. 111, pp. 111–115, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  50. L. Anselin, Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, vol. 4, Springer, 1988.
  51. J. P. Elhorst, “Spatial panel data models,” in Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis, M. M. Fischer and A. Getis, Eds., pp. 377–407, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  52. J. P. Elhorst, “Spatial panel data models,” in Spatial Econometrics, pp. 37–93, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  53. B. Baltagi, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
  54. J. P. Elhorst, “Matlab software for spatial panels,” in Proceedings of the IVth World Conference of the Spatial Econometrics Association (SEA), June 2010.
  55. Z. Shuxiao and D. Yong-an, “Heterogeneity, fiscal decentralization and Urban economic growth: research based on panel quantile regression,” Journal of Financial Research, vol. 1, pp. 103–105, 2012 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  56. M. Limei and Z. Xiao, “The spatial effect of China’s haze pollution and the impact from economic change and energy structure,” in China industrial economics, vol. 4, pp. 19–31, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  57. L.-F. Lee and J. Yu, “Some recent developments in spatial panel data models,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 255–271, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. L. Jinyong, J. Yang, and S. Haiyan, “FDI, human capital and environmental pollution in china: a quantile regression analysis based on panel data of 249 cities,” Journal of International Trade, vol. 4, pp. 118–125, 2014 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar