Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2017, Article ID 9475854, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9475854
Research Article

An Analysis of Discrete Stage-Structured Prey and Prey-Predator Population Models

School of Business and Economics, The Arctic University of Norway, Campus Harstad, Harstad, Norway

Correspondence should be addressed to Arild Wikan; on.tiu@nakiw.dlira

Received 23 February 2017; Accepted 27 March 2017; Published 16 April 2017

Academic Editor: Hammad Khalil

Copyright © 2017 Arild Wikan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Guckenheimer, G. Oster, and A. Ipaktchi, “The dynamics of density dependent population models,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 101–147, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. S. A. Levin and C. P. Goodyear, “Analysis of an age-structured fishery model,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 245–274, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. J. A. Silva and T. G. Hallam, “Compensation and stability in nonlinear matrix models,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 67–101, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. J. A. Silva and T. G. Hallam, “Effects of delay, truncations and density dependence in reproduction schedules on stability of nonlinear Leslie matrix models,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 367–395, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. A. Wikan and E. Mjølhus, “Periodicity of 4 in age-structured population models with density dependence,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 173, no. 2, pp. 109–119, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Wikan and E. Mjølhus, “Overcompensatory recruitment and generation delay in discrete age-structured population models,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 195–239, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. E. Mjølhus, A. Wikan, and T. Solberg, “On synchronization in semelparous populations,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. J. M. Cushing, B. Dennis, R. A. Desharnais, and R. F. Costantino, “An interdisciplinary approach to understanding nonlinear ecological dynamics,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 92, no. 2-3, pp. 111–119, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. F. Costantino, R. A. Desharnais, J. M. Cushing, and B. Dennis, “Chaotic dynamics in an insect population,” Science, vol. 275, no. 5298, pp. 389–391, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. G. Neubert and H. Caswell, “Density-dependent vital rates and their population dynamic consequences,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 103–121, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. N. V. Davydova, O. Diekmann, and S. A. van Gils, “Year class coexistence or competitive exclusion for strict biennials?” Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 95–131, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. A. Wikan and A. Eide, “An analysis of a nonlinear stage-structured cannibalism model with application to the northeast arctic cod stock,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1685–1704, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. A. Wikan, “On the interplay between cannibalism and harvest in stage-structured population models,” Journal of Marine Biology, vol. 2015, Article ID 580520, 8 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Wikan, “Age or stage structure? A comparison of dynamic outcomes from discrete age- and stage-structured population models,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1354–1378, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. M. Gyllenberg, G. Söderbacka, and S. Ericsson, “Does migration stabilize local population dynamics? Analysis of a discrete metapopulation model,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 25–49, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. A. Wikan, “On reserves, stability and the maximum sustainable yield problem,” Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 325–333, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. J. R. Beddington, C. A. Free, and J. H. Lawton, “Dynamic complexity in predator-prey models framed in difference equations,” Nature, vol. 255, no. 5503, pp. 58–60, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Hastings, “Age-dependent predation is not a simple process. II. Wolves, ungulates, and a discrete time model for predation on juveniles with a stabilizing tail,” Theoretical Population Biology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 271–282, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. H. A. Lauwerier and J. A. Metz, “Hopf bifurcation in host-parasitoid models,” IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Medicine and Biology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 191–209, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. M. G. Neubert and M. Kot, “The subcritical collapse of predator populations in discrete-time predator-prey models,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 45–66, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. A. Wikan, “From chaos to chaos. An analysis of a discrete age-structured prey-predator model,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 471–500, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. S. A. Gourley and Y. Kuang, “A stage structured predator-prey model and its dependence on maturation delay and death rate,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 188–200, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. H. Behncke, “Periodical cicadas,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 413–431, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. R. Kon, Y. Saito, and Y. Takeuchi, “Permanence of single-species stage-structured models,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 515–528, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology: Spatial Models and Biomedical Applications, Biomathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 3rd edition, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1990. View at MathSciNet
  27. A. Wikan, “Dynamic consequences of reproductive delay in Leslie matrix models with nonlinear survival probabilities,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 37–62, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus