Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2018, Article ID 1604298, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1604298
Research Article

Improved DEA Cross Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points

School of Management, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Qiang Hou; moc.361@77264040981

Received 2 January 2018; Accepted 7 March 2018; Published 10 April 2018

Academic Editor: Paolo Renna

Copyright © 2018 Qiang Hou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Q. Wei, Data Envelopment Analysis, Science Press Co. Ltd., 2004. View at MathSciNet
  2. J. Wu, L. Liang, Y. Zha, and F. Yang, “Determination of cross-efficiency under the principle of rank priority in cross-evaluation,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 4826–4829, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Ramón, J. L. Ruiz, and I. Sirvent, “On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 207, no. 3, pp. 1564–1572, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y.-M. Wang, K.-S. Chin, and Y. Luo, “Cross-efficiency evaluation based on ideal and anti-ideal decision making units,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 10312–10319, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. M. Wang and S. Wang, “Approaches to determining the relative importance weights for cross-efficiency aggregation in data envelopment analysis,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 60–69, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Ramón, J. L. Ruiz, and I. Sirvent, “Dominance relations and ranking of units by using interval number ordering with cross-efficiency intervals,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 1336–1343, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. D. Cook and J. Zhu, “DEA Cobb-Douglas frontier and cross-efficiency,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 265–268, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Barzegarinegad, G. Jahanshahloo, and M. Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, “A full ranking for decision making units using ideal and anti-ideal points in DEA,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 282939, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Lim and J. Zhu, “DEA cross-efficiency evaluation under variable returns to scale,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 476–487, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. A. Ramalho, J. J. S. Ramalho, and P. D. Henriques, “Fractional regression models for second stage DEA efficiency analyses,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 239–255, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Khodabakhshi and K. Aryavash, “The cross-efficiency in the optimistic–pessimistic framework,” Operational Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 619–632, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Sh. Nasen and H. Kiaei, “Cross-efficiency evaluation by the use of ideal and anti-ideal virtual DMUs’ assessment in DEA,” International Journal of Applied Operational Research, vol. 3, pp. 69–79, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  13. S. A. Rakhshan, “Efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis by using TOPSIS-DEA method,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 906–918, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Wu and L. Liang, “Rank preservation for adding new dmus in cross efficiency method,” in Systems Engineering, vol. 7, pp. 111–115, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Wang, “Cross-efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Super-efficiency DEA Model,” Systems Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 115–118, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  16. K. Wang and F. Wei, “DEA Method for Three-Parameter Interval Cross Efficiency,” Industrial Engineering Journal, vol. 2, pp. 19–22, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  17. F. Yang, Q. Xia, and L. Liang, “DEA cross efficiency evaluation method for competitive and cooperative decision making units,” System Engineering—Theory & Practice, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 92–98, 2011 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Zongsheng, H. Pei, and N. Jiajia, “Cross Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Maximizing Deviations,” Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 6, pp. 177–181, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  19. Y. Cheng and Y. Yang, “Network DEA for Matrix-type Organization with Application,” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 5, pp. 103–109, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  20. H. Xue, Z. Zheng, and Q. Xie, “An Approach on the Performance Evaluation Problems Based on Multiple DEA Models and Gini Criterion —Evaluating the Performance of University in China,” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 4, pp. 98–104, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  21. S. Jiasen, Research on Cross efficiency of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA): Theoretical Method and Application, University of Science and Technology of China, 2014.
  22. J. Fang, W. Yue, and M. Wu, “Dealing with interval DEA based on error propagation and entropy,” Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1293–1303, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. Liu, L.-F. Wang, and J. Chang, “A Revised Model of the Neutral DEA Model and Its Extension,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 1619798, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. W. Liu, Y. Wang, and L. Shulong, “DEA weighted cross-efficiency evaluation based on the reliability level and the transition matrix,” Journal of Systems Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 570–576, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  25. S. Z. Zhang and Z. W. Gong, “DEA Game Cross Efficiency Method for Dynamic Change of Competitive and Cooperative between Decision Making Units,” Operations Research & Management Science, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 22–27, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  26. J. Wu, L. Liang, and Y. Zha, “Preference voting and ranking using DEA game cross efficiency model,” Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, vol. 2, pp. 105–111, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  27. H. Chinglai and Y. Kwangsun, Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Springer-Verlag, 1981.
  28. Y. Wang and K. Chin, “A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 3666–3675, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus