Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2018, Article ID 5385627, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5385627
Research Article

An Evaluation Method of Comprehensive Product Quality for Customer Satisfaction Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Number

School of Management, Shenyang University of Technology, No. 111, Shenliao West Road, Economic & Technological Development Zone, Shenyang 110870, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Yinyun Yu; moc.qq@3815095303

Received 18 October 2017; Revised 1 January 2018; Accepted 24 January 2018; Published 25 February 2018

Academic Editor: Silvia Romanelli

Copyright © 2018 Wei Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Huang, “An approach to the performance evaluation of enterprise knowledge management with fuzzy linguistic information,” Journal of Convergence Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 106–112, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. H. Wu and S. M. Hsieh, “A case study of applying importance-performance analysis in orthopedic department to evaluate service quality,” International Journal of Management & Decision Making, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 50–68, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  3. C. G. Şen and H. Baraçli, “Fuzzy quality function deployment based methodology for acquiring enterprise software selection requirements,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 3415–3426, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. M. H. Chowdhury and M. A. Quaddus, “A multi-phased QFD based optimization approach to sustainable service design,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 171, pp. 165–178, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. J. Cronin and S. A. Taylor, “Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 55–68, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry, “A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 49, no. 4, p. 41, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. R. Liu, L. Cui, G. Zeng, H. Wu, and C. Wang, “Applying the fuzzy SERVQUAL method to measure the service quality in certification & inspection industry,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 26, pp. 508–512, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  8. E. O. C. Mkpojiogu and N. L. Hashim, “Understanding the relationship between Kano model’s customer satisfaction scores and self-stated requirements importance,” SpringerPlus, vol. 5, no. 1, article no. 197, pp. 1–22, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Grönroos, “A service quality model and its marketing implications,” European Journal of Marketing, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 36–44, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S. M. Bhatia and A. K. Sharma, “Fuzzy quality function deployment and software engineering- a literature review,” Software Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 396–404, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  11. K. Sivasamy, C. Arumugam, and S. R. Devadasan, “Advanced models of quality function deployment: a literature review,” Quality and Quantity, vol. 50, no. 3, p. 16, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. K. Purohit and A. K. Sharma, “Evaluation of programming tools for the development of data mining driven forecasting software tool for quality function deployment,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Technology, CICT 2016, pp. 134–139, February 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Celotto, V. Loia, and S. Senatore, “Fuzzy linguistic approach to quality assessment model for electricity network infrastructure,” Information Sciences, vol. 304, pp. 1–15, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J.-Q. Wang, J.-T. Wu, J. Wang, H.-Y. Zhang, and X.-H. Chen, “Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on the Hausdorff distance of hesitant fuzzy linguistic numbers,” Soft Computing, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1621–1633, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Parasuraman, L. L. Berry, and V. A. Zeithaml, “Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale,” Journal of Retailing, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 420–450, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Zhang, Z. Fan, and Y. U. Chao, “A Service Quality Evaluation Method Considering the Tolerance Zones of Service Aspirations Provided by Customers,” Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 88–93, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  17. G. L. Zuo, X. N. Chu, and D. P. Chen, “Product service system optimal selection based on intuitionistic fuzzy information axiom,” Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1134–1141, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  18. K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Physica-Verlag, NY, USA, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S.-M. Wu, H.-C. Liu, and L.-E. Wang, “Hesitant fuzzy integrated MCDM approach for quality function deployment: a case study in electric vehicle,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 55, no. 15, pp. 4436–4449, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S.-W. Wang, X.-Q. Ding, and Z.-Z. Ding, “Model for performance evaluation in customs service management with dual hesitant fuzzy information,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 2131–2137, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C.-N. Liao and H.-P. Kao, “An evaluation approach to logistics service using fuzzy theory, quality function development and goal programming,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 54–64, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Zhang, J. Zhang, K.-K. Lai, and Y. Lu, “An novel approach to supplier selection based on vague sets group decision,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 9557–9563, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Ren, X. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, “An approach to software quality assessment with triangular fuzzy linguistic information,” International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 256–262, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Akhundzadeh and B. Shirazi, “Technology selection and evaluation in Iran's pulp and paper industry using 2-filterd fuzzy decision making method,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 142, pp. 3028–3043, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Mao, L. Jiao, S. Gao et al., “Surface quality evaluation in meso-scale end-milling operation based on fractal theory and the Taguchi method,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 91, no. 1-4, pp. 657–665, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. Jiang, G. Xu, T. Tao, and L. Liang, “Rolling bearing quality evaluation based on a morphological filter and a Kolmogorov complexity measure,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 459–464, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. García, A. Valles, J. Sánchez, S. Noriega, and G. Dominguez, “Statistical equation modeling analysis for industrial projects, designing for critical factors and latent variables: quality, cost, time, and success,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 88, no. 1-4, pp. 767–779, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus