Research Article
Study on Spatial Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Air Quality Index in Beijing and Its Correlation with Local Meteorological Conditions
Table 2
Relationship between air quality index and meteorological elements on the scale of average solar terms from 2016 to 2017 in Beijing.
| Year | Project | Average temperature | Average specific humidity | Average wind speed |
| 2016 | Pearson correlation coefficient | −.127 | −.137 | −.207 | Significance level | 0.016 | 0.017 | 0 | Number of samples | 363 | 303 | 363 |
| 2017 | Pearson correlation coefficient | −.109 | −0.053 | −.176 | Significance level | 0.043 | 0.326 | 0.001 | Number of samples | 347 | 347 | 347 |
| 2016-2017 | Pearson correlation coefficient | −.116 | −0.073 | −.192 | Significance level | 0.002 | 0.061 | 0 | Number of samples | 710 | 650 | 710 |
| 2016-Spring | Pearson correlation coefficient | −0.124 | 0.065 | −0.158 | Significance level | 0.241 | 0.542 | 0.135 | Number of samples | 91 | 91 | 91 |
| 2016-Summer | Pearson correlation coefficient | .219 | .378 | 0.134 | Significance level | 0.036 | 0 | 0.201 | Number of samples | 92 | 92 | 92 |
| 2016-Autumn | Pearson correlation coefficient | −0.085 | 0.031 | −0.19 | Significance level | 0.423 | 0.768 | 0.071 | Number of samples | 91 | 91 | 91 |
| 2016-Winter | Pearson correlation coefficient | .275 | .673 | −.381 | Significance level | 0.009 | 0 | 0 | Number of samples | 89 | 29 | 89 |
| 2017-Spring | Pearson correlation coefficient | 0.091 | .226 | −0.087 | Significance level | 0.416 | 0.041 | 0.44 | Number of samples | 82 | 82 | 82 |
| 2017-Summer | Pearson correlation coefficient | .544 | .229 | 0.144 | Significance level | 0 | 0.036 | 0.192 | Number of samples | 84 | 84 | 84 |
| 2017-Autumn | Pearson correlation coefficient | .274 | .450 | −.306 | Significance level | 0.009 | 0 | 0.003 | Number of samples | 91 | 91 | 91 |
| 2017-Winter | Pearson correlation coefficient | 0.025 | .661 | −.373 | Significance level | 0.813 | 0 | 0 | Number of samples | 90 | 90 | 90 |
|
|
Note: Significant correlation at 0.05 level (bilateral). Was significantly correlated at the .01 level (bilateral). |