Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society

Research Article

Impact of Livelihood Assets on Farmland-Transferred Households’ Willingness to Urbanism and Policies Implications for Farmland Transfer: Evidence from Zhejiang, China

Table 6

Parameter estimated.


Hypothesis	Path	Estimate	Estimate	S.E.	C.R.	P
Hypothesis	Path	(Standardized)	(Unstandardized)	S.E.	C.R.	P

H1	BFT→NC	-	-	-	-	-
H2	OFT→NC	-	-	-	-	-
H3	BFT→HC	0.26	0.429	0.119	3.607	0.000
H4	OFT→HC	-	-	-	-	-
H5	BFT→PC	-	-	-	-	-
H6	OFT→PC	0.13	0.105	0.058	1.833	0.067
H7	BFT→FC	0.24	0.464	0.137	3.395	0.000
H8	OFT→FC	0.18	0.141	0.058	2.405	0.016
H9	BFT→SC	0.36	0.519	0.113	4.581	0.000
H10	OFT→SC	0.20	0.122	0.045	2.717	0.007
H11	NC→UI	-	-	-	-	-
H12	HC→UI	-0.15	-0.11	0.049	-2.262	0.024
H13	PC→UI	0.19	0.126	0.044	2.877	0.004
H14	FC→UI	-0.15	-0.099	0.053	-1.867	0.062
H15	SC→UI	-0.12	-0.102	0.061	-1.682	0.093

P<0.1, P<0.05, P<0.01.
S.E. is standard error, and C.R. is composite reliability.
Abbreviations: BFT, Benefit of farmland transfer; OFT, Openness in farmland transfer; UI, Willingness to urbanism; NC, Natural capital; HC, Human capital; PC, Physical capital; FC, Financial capital; SC, Social capital.