Research Article
A TOPSIS-Based Model for Evaluating the Performance of the Intellectual Property Value Strategies of Science and Technology Enterprises
Table 4
Performance evaluation results of intellectual property value strategy.
| Enterprise name | Financial performance dimension evaluation value | Ran king | External performance dimension evaluation value | Ran king | Value chain performance dimensions evaluation value | Ran king | Comprehensive evaluation value | Ranking |
| Highlander | 0.0790 | 5 | 0.0208 | 2 | 0.0146 | 3 | 0.0644 | 5 | Sun create | 0.0789 | 6 | 0.0107 | 5 | 0.0090 | 5 | 0.0643 | 6 | SUFA technology | 0.0794 | 4 | 0.0171 | 3 | 0.0137 | 4 | 0.0651 | 4 | BDstar navigation | 0.0814 | 3 | 0.0018 | 6 | 0.0024 | 6 | 0.0655 | 3 | Haige communications | 0.0844 | 2 | 0.0109 | 4 | 0.0282 | 2 | 0.0705 | 2 | Goertek | 0.0955 | 1 | 0.0839 | 1 | 0.1038 | 1 | 0.0983 | 1 |
|
|
Notes: the smaller the ranking value, the better the performance of the company’s intellectual property strategy.
|