|
| Game player | Sign | Variable |
|
| Functional department | I2 | Performance benefits of smart government platform business processing |
| C3 | Actively use blockchain technology to optimize the cost of smart government business processing |
| C4 | Negative treatment of blockchain technology only maintain the cost of online business processing expenditure |
| P4 | When not in use blockchain technology huge amounts of data collect processing information distortion |
| Β | Using blockchain technology to improve the precision service level of functional departments |
| S2 | Using blockchain technology to improve the precision service revenue of functional departments |
| P2 | Lax supervision of local government, blockchain technology the system security risks of losses |
|
| Local government | I1 | Economic and social benefits of smart government platform operation |
| C1 | The cost of strict supervision |
| C2 | The cost of loose supervision |
| P1 | When users use it, the government’s lack of supervision results in privacy leakage, which damages the government’s credibility |
| A1 | When strict supervision is carried out, the reward gains of noncompliance in functional departments are found |
| Α | Blockchain technology is used to optimize the flat management efficiency of the public management structure |
| S1 | Using blockchain technology to optimize the flat management benefits of the public management structure |
|
| End user | I3 | The net income of personalized and customized services obtained via the smart government platform |
| C5 | Still choose the total cost of business hall processing |
| P3 | When the local government loose supervision, users will lose privacy security risks when they use the platform |
| Γ | The degree of trust and authority that functional departments get from users using blockchain technology |
| S3 | Functional departments make use of the trust gained by the users of blockchain technology to determine the benefits of rights |
|
