Research Article
Spatiotemporal Coupling Coordination Analysis of Social Economy and Resource Environment of Central Cities in the Yellow River Basin
Table 3
Coupling coordination degree classification.
| Type | D | Degree | Relationship of S and E | Description |
| Dissonance recession | 0–0.09 | Profound incoordination | S > E | Resources and environment lag | S < E | Social economy lag | S = E | Coordination development | 0.1–0.19 | Serious incoordination | S > E | Resources and environment lag | S < E | Social economy lag | S = E | Coordination development | 0.2–0.29 | Moderate incoordination | S > E | Resources and environment lag | S < E | Social economy lag | S = E | Coordination development |
| Transitional category | 0.3–0.39 | Mild incoordination | S > E | Resources and environment lag | S < E | Social economy lag | S = E | Coordination development | 0.4–0.49 | On the verge of incoordination | S > E | Resources and environment lag | S < E | Social economy lag | S = E | Coordinated development | 0.5–0.59 | Reluctant coordination | S > E | Resources and environment lag | S < E | Social economy lag | S = E | Coordinated development | 0.6–0.69 | Primary coordination | S > E | Resources and environment lag | S < E | Social economy lag | S = E | Coordinated development |
| Coordinated development | 0.7–0.79 | Intermediate coordination | S > E | Resources and environment lag | S < E | Social economy lag | S = E | Coordinated development | 0.8–0.89 | Good coordination | S > E | Resources and environment lag | S < E | Social economy lag | S = E | Coordinated development | 0.9–1 | Quality coordination | S > E | Resources and environment lag | S < E | Social economy lag | S = E | Coordinated development |
|
|