Dynamic Evaluation of Urban Sustainability Based on ELECTRE: A Case Study from China

Table 4

The sustainability evaluation value and ranking of each city in the economic dimension.

City	Value					Ranking					Consider the time weighting
	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	Value	Ranking
Zhengzhou	16.000	16.000	16.000	16.000	15.959	1	1	1	1	1	15.986	1
Kaifeng	−1.722	−4.115	−2.655	−6.713	−3.365	12	12	12	14	13	−4.106	13
Luoyang	10.667	10.949	11.680	11.141	10.974	2	2	2	2	2	11.136	2
Pingdingshan	−1.305	−2.573	−2.613	−4.858	−2.866	11	11	11	12	11	−3.204	11
Anyang	0.567	1.173	1.136	−1.014	−3.286	8	9	9	10	12	−0.944	10
Hebi	1.619	1.928	2.246	1.494	2.039	6	6	6	7	6	1.892	6
Xinxiang	2.503	0.566	2.338	2.196	3.442	5	10	5	6	5	2.443	5
Jiaozuo	5.057	6.057	5.594	5.761	6.771	3	3	3	4	4	6.057	4
Puyang	−7.474	−5.833	−4.440	−2.913	−2.607	14	14	13	11	10	−3.810	12
Xuchang	0.094	2.994	1.439	2.473	1.255	10	5	8	5	7	1.771	7
Luohe	0.319	1.879	1.443	1.070	0.040	9	7	7	9	9	0.859	9
Sanmenxia	4.351	3.397	3.898	8.164	8.552	4	4	4	3	3	6.551	3
Nanyang	1.333	1.195	0.573	1.337	0.523	7	8	10	8	8	0.894	8
Shangqiu	−10.104	−9.632	−10.755	−10.827	−11.735	17	17	17	17	17	−10.908	17
Xinyang	−3.771	−5.783	−7.850	−5.760	−6.960	13	13	14	13	14	−6.449	14
Zhoukou	−8.326	−8.680	−8.482	−8.539	−7.668	15	15	15	15	15	−8.242	15
Zhumadian	−9.810	−9.523	−9.551	−9.011	−11.070	16	16	16	16	16	−9.927	16