Dynamic Evaluation of Urban Sustainability Based on ELECTRE: A Case Study from China

Table 5

The sustainability evaluation value and ranking of each city in the social dimension.

City	Value					Ranking					Consider the time weighting
	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	Value	Ranking
Zhengzhou	8.074	7.312	8.107	8.271	2.705	1	2	1	1	5	6.242	1
Kaifeng	−0.838	2.838	6.503	−0.852	−4.791	12	5	2	13	16	−0.201	11
Luoyang	3.042	3.820	3.678	1.049	5.433	4	3	5	5	1	3.539	3
Pingdingshan	0.783	−1.131	−0.286	−0.772	0.368	8	12	8	12	9	−0.239	12
Anyang	0.992	0.282	−1.338	0.838	1.332	6	11	12	6	7	0.504	7
Hebi	3.560	1.333	1.432	5.679	0.305	3	6	6	2	10	2.317	4
Xinxiang	−1.270	−2.590	−2.936	−0.273	4.619	13	14	14	9	4	0.450	8
Jiaozuo	0.537	0.711	−0.767	−0.387	0.876	9	7	9	10	8	0.166	10
Puyang	−3.349	−5.590	−2.745	0.385	−1.443	14	15	13	7	11	−1.896	14
Xuchang	−0.364	0.371	−0.909	−0.973	1.918	10	10	10	14	6	0.223	9
Luohe	0.871	0.561	0.666	0.371	−2.470	7	8	7	8	12	−0.458	13
Sanmenxia	7.168	8.236	5.521	2.190	4.761	2	1	3	4	3	4.851	2
Nanyang	−0.811	−1.249	−1.315	−2.166	5.000	11	13	11	15	2	0.605	6
Shangqiu	−7.298	−9.654	−9.157	−7.946	−4.523	16	17	17	16	15	−7.232	16
Xinyang	2.505	3.720	4.589	5.075	−2.739	5	4	4	3	13	2.021	5
Zhoukou	−8.832	−9.383	−7.247	−9.988	−7.741	17	16	16	17	17	−8.533	17
Zhumadian	−4.770	0.414	−3.798	−0.499	−3.610	15	9	15	11	14	−2.359	15