Dynamic Evaluation of Urban Sustainability Based on ELECTRE: A Case Study from China

Table 6

The sustainability evaluation value and ranking of each city in the environmental dimension.

City	Value					Ranking					Consider the time weighting
	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	Value	Ranking
Zhengzhou	−6.494	−5.929	−4.561	−1.585	−6.498	17	15	13	12	17	−4.724	15
Kaifeng	−5.587	−4.822	4.919	−2.492	−2.705	15	14	3	13	12	−1.598	11
Luoyang	−2.226	4.410	2.159	−3.411	1.011	9	6	7	15	7	0.299	10
Pingdingshan	−4.919	−3.656	−1.983	4.905	1.658	13	12	9	3	6	0.649	7
Anyang	−4.959	−3.571	−4.043	−3.391	−3.610	14	11	12	14	14	−3.723	14
Hebi	7.784	−0.217	7.778	−0.069	3.740	2	9	2	10	4	3.274	4
Xinxiang	−4.319	−3.979	−4.632	−7.228	−6.055	11	13	14	16	16	−5.690	16
Jiaozuo	−4.807	−5.987	−5.305	−9.704	−4.292	12	16	16	17	15	−6.198	17
Puyang	3.326	5.915	−2.015	−0.108	0.116	6	4	10	11	10	0.617	8
Xuchang	5.323	6.148	4.547	3.069	3.800	4	3	4	4	3	4.169	3
Luohe	12.037	6.484	8.818	5.618	3.605	1	2	1	2	5	6.131	2
Sanmenxia	−2.473	0.228	−5.507	1.083	−2.656	10	8	17	8	11	−1.832	12
Nanyang	−5.617	−8.620	−4.759	1.154	−2.854	16	17	15	7	13	−3.119	13
Shangqiu	−0.866	4.863	2.710	0.149	4.675	8	5	6	9	2	2.731	5
Xinyang	6.534	7.356	0.310	2.125	0.123	3	1	8	6	9	2.086	6
Zhoukou	2.261	−0.542	−2.749	3.064	0.462	7	10	11	5	8	0.500	9
Zhumadian	5.003	1.919	4.312	6.819	9.478	5	7	5	1	1	6.429	1