Research Article
Socially Responsible Investment Portfolio Construction with a Double-Screening Mechanism considering Machine Learning Prediction
Table 4
Comparison of the DSSRI-I and the SSRI-GMV.
| Model | Portfolio cardinality C = 15 | Portfolio cardinality C = 16 | Portfolio cardinality C = 17 | AR | SR | ESG | AR | SR | ESG | AR | SR | ESG |
| DSSRI-I | 0.0982 | 0.4930 | 61.9809 | 0.0904 | 0.4701 | 61.8525 | 0.1113 | 0.5517 | 61.9619 | SSRI-GMV | 0.0444 | 0.3198 | 55.3456 | 0.0583 | 0.3901 | 55.5345 | 0.0686 | 0.4281 | 55.6346 |
| Model | Portfolio cardinality C = 18 | Portfolio cardinality C = 19 | Portfolio cardinality C = 20 | AR | SR | ESG | AR | SR | ESG | AR | SR | ESG |
| DSSRI-I | 0.0947 | 0.4952 | 61.5369 | 0.0962 | 0.5049 | 61.2844 | 0.0994 | 0.5222 | 60.9385 | SSRI-GMV | 0.0614 | 0.3931 | 55.5110 | 0.0564 | 0.3710 | 55.3652 | 0.0567 | 0.3712 | 55.6201 |
|
|
AR = annualized return; SR=Sharpe ratio; ESG = ESG score. The best values are demonstrated with bold font.
|