Abstract

The synchronization of states is important to sustain the energy of consumers at any given time for power networks. This paper focuses on the multi-area power network model and then analyzes the cluster synchronization of this kind of network comprised of a third-order chaotic power system. Specifically, we investigate the rich dynamic properties of the single third-order power system. Furthermore, the multi-area network model with the chaotic power system is proposed and the adaptive controller is designed to achieve cluster synchronization. Combining analytical considerations with numerical simulations on a small-scale network, we address the cluster synchronous performance in the multi-area power network. Therefore, our results can provide a basic physical picture for power system dynamics and enable us to further understand the complex dynamical behavior in the multi-area power network.

1. Introduction

As we know, modern power networks play a crucial role in our modern society today. Power networks refer to complex interconnected systems for routing power via transmission lines [13].

Generally, they consist of a large number of heterogeneous elements that operate interlinked, creating a multiplex network. In this multiplex network, the interlinked nodes either play the role of an energy generator or an energy consumer. Furthermore, it operates normally only if the total demand power matches the total supply from all the generators [4]. Meanwhile, its dynamical behavior is extremely important for stable operation of the power network. One of the most common and useful models for studying power systems is the canonical single machine infinite bus system, which takes into account its electro-behavior [5]. Furthermore, the single machine infinite bus system refers to a power network that corresponds to an oscillatory power-grid node and a connected system as an environment. In addition, the Kuramoto-like model is a standard mathematical model to investigate the dynamics of the power network [69]. However, the Kuramot-like model does not take into account the physical characteristics of the power grid. Therefore, most of the existing works have missed a detailed analysis of the nonlinear dynamic behaviors for the third-order power system.

Due to the increasing of renewable energy sources on power production, questions concerning the limits, quantification, and control of power grid stability face new challenges. Therefore, the power system represents a distributed network carrying many small units of energy to the consumers instead of large units of energy coming from a few power plants. This implies that the power system will undergo a lot of challenges concerning grid topology [1012]. As a consequence, the power network will be divided into small areas. As a matter of fact, the real power network usually has a multi-area structure. However, in many recent studies on power system dynamics, this special topology structure is neglected.

Based on the above discussion, in the present paper, we focus on a more realistic third-order system model to describe the multi-area power network. The investigation of power systems has been recently addressed from a nonlinear dynamics point of view. Meanwhile, synchronization is vital for the stable operation and control of the power network, and it is necessary to ensure appropriate operation of power generation [1316]. From the dynamics viewpoint, synchronization is essential for the proper functioning of the power network. Its loss can lead to cascading failure [1719]. In virtue of multi-area structures, new patterns of synchronization are relevant [15]. In particular, cluster synchronization plays a crucial role on keeping the power balance [2024]. This synchronous pattern implies that nodes in different areas can achieve different synchronous states to cope with energy imbalance. Thus, we are going to address the cluster synchronization in the multi-area network.

This paper is organized as follows. First, we present a third-order power system model in Section 2. Afterwards, the characteristics of dynamic behavior for a single power system are investigated in Section 3. We propose the multi-area power network model and analyze the cluster synchronization in Section 4. Finally, we present our results, followed by a summary in Section 5.

2. Analysis of Dynamics of the Third-Order Power System

2.1. The Third-Order Power System Model

The simple third-order power model is illustrated in Figure 1, which can be viewed as a generalized case. In terms of the power system, denotes generator, represents transformer reactance, is the transmission line reactance, and and denote infinite bus voltage and synchronous generator terminal voltage, respectively.

In what follows, we will focus on the third-order single machine infinite bus system with the excitation mechanism model, which is given bywhere denotes the generator rotor angle, represents the deviation of rotor angular velocity from synchronous angular velocity, is the transient voltage, , , denote synchronous angular velocity, damping coefficient, and inertia constant, respectively, is the excitation voltage, and represents the mechanical power of generator.

Without loss of generality, the third-order single machine infinite bus system can be cast into a simplified model, namely,

For convenience, we set

Moreover, we select the parameters Thus, we can obtain the third-order single machine infinite bus system from equation (2):where denotes the generator rotor angle, represents the transient voltage, and is the relative speed. In what follows, we aim to study the rich dynamic behavior of system (3).

2.2. Basic Properties of the System

In this section, the chaotic dynamics of the third-order power system are analyzed. According to the Wolff algorithm, the largest Lyapunov exponents of the system are and the system displays chaotic state. We consider the vector field divergence of the system, and one can obtain

Thus, we can get

Then,

In particular, . If , system (3) will be a dissipative system.

Furthermore, we can calculate the Kaplan–Yorke dimension for chaotic system (3):

That is, system (3) displays chaotic behavior.

In order to better understand the dynamic behavior of the third-order power system, we show the phase diagrams and the evolution of variables of the system under different parameters.

Firstly, we take the parameter and the initial values , and the system is in periodic state, as shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b).

In what follows, we select the parameter and the initial value ; as can be seen from Figures 3(a) and 3(b), one can find that the system converges to a fixed point. That is, the values of parameters play an important role on the dynamics for the power system.

2.3. Analysis of Bifurcation Condition for the Power System

In this section, we focus on investigating the bifurcation behavior of the third-order chaotic power system. Firstly, according to equation.(3), the Jacobian matrix can be calculated as follows:where denotes the equilibrium point of system (3), and from equation (8), we get

Based on the above algebraic equation, we can obtain that

In the following, we suppose thatwhere

Thus, the equation of bifurcation curve can be described by the following equations:

By means of bifurcation diagram, dynamic behaviors with varying system parameter a are investigated. Let the system parameter a vary from −0.2 to 1 with the step size of 0.001, and the other parameters are taken as ; the bifurcation diagram can provide an overall perspective of the dynamics of the system, which is depicted in Figure 4.

From the bifurcation diagram, it can be observed that with the increase of a from −0.2, system (3) is chaotic over most of the scope , and when , the system converges to a fixed point. With the value of a increasing from −0.1, system (3) presents Hopf bifurcation.

3. Analysis of Multi-Area Network Coupled with Chaotic Power System

We are witnessing a time of drastic changes in the operation of power grids caused by the necessity to reduce global warming caused by large emission of carbon dioxide gases. Thus, more and more decentralized renewable energy sources are replacing centralized power generation. The strategy can change the effective grid structure from a fully connected to a locally connected one. Hence, large-scale real power networks will be divided into many areas. This implies that the power network usually has multi-area structure. Generally, the interactions between nodes (generators and consumers) in the same area are identical and those in different areas are nonidentical. Hence, there exist diverse coupling forms in the multi-area power network. For better describing this kind of phenomenon, the multi-area power network model is presented. Also, the schematic diagram of the multi-area power network is shown in Figure 5. Here, we suppose that the node’s dynamics in different areas are identical, which is described as system (3).

Furthermore, alternating voltage of the power plants is required to be synchronized around a certain specific frequency; otherwise, severe problems like large blackouts may be occur in a large area. Thus, cluster synchronization is essential for the proper functioning of the multi-area power network. In the following, we will investigate the multi-area power network model and its cluster synchronization.

3.1. The Multi-Area Power Network Model

In this section, we consider a complex multi-area power network with areas and each node is a third-order power system. Suppose that the area is composed of nodes. Then, the general multi-area power network can be described aswhere denotes the state vector of the node in the area. describes the node’s dynamics of the area. The matrix is the inner coupling matrix which denotes the internal connection in area, and and are the inner coupling matrices between the and areas; if the element of in the area is influenced by the element of in the , then ; otherwise, . Also, matrix denotes the topology structure of the entire multi-area power network, which is described as follows: if there exists a connection between node and , then ; otherwise, .

Suppose that the sets of subscripts of these areas are where . The coupling matrix can be written in the following form:where show the coupling pattern in the same area and are the coupling schemes among different areas.

In order to achieve cluster synchronization of the multi-area power network, the control inputs are added and the controlled multi-area power network can be characterized by the following equation:

Define the synchronous errorswhere is a solution of an isolated node in the and satisfies . The network can realize the cluster synchronization, if .

3.2. Cluster Synchronization of Multi-Area Power Network

For simplicity, we suppose that all the inner coupling patterns between different areas are identical, and equation (14) can be derived as

According to the above definition of the error variables, we can get the error dynamical system as follows:

Since the above coupling condition holds, one can obtainwhere represents all the nodes in the area and represents the nodes in other areas.

Subsequently, the control scheme is given via adaptive pinning control idea. The adaptive controller is designed as follows:where the coupling strength between the nodes and the feedback gains adopts the following adaptive strategy:where are the adaptive gains.

Theorem 1. For multi-area power network (18), cluster synchronization can be achieved under designed controllers (21) and (22).

Proof. Construct a Lyapunov function asThen, the derivative of can be calculated as follows:where .
Thus, there exists a positive constant larger than the corresponding coupling strength , i.e.,Therefore, one can take sufficiently large positive constants , i.e., . That is, cluster synchronization can be achieved via designed adaptive controllers (21) and (22).

4. Numerical Simulations

In this section, several numerical examples are presented to verify the theoretical results about cluster synchronization in the multi-area power network. In the following simulations, we take the network topology structure shown in Figure 1 as example. Moreover, we select the node dynamics of the different area as the third-order power system:with .

Figures 68 show the evolution of state variables and the error time of each area; from these figures, one can observe that the different areas synchronize to different chaotic orbits and errors evolve toward zero. An intuitive representation of the evolution of the components of the state variables of the multi-area network can be found in Figures 6(a)8(a). In these figures, the top subfigures show the amplitudes of state variables in different areas and the bottom subfigures represent the corresponding evolution of state variables. In addition, Figures 68 show the state trajectories of the nodes in different areas with different initial conditions. As can be seen from these figures, state variablies evolve in the same direction and get closer with time and finally coincide under the designed controller. It implies that cluster synchronization can be realized for the multi-area power network.

5. Conclusions

As we know, real power networks have complex structures. This paper investigated the multi-area power network to model the network topology underlying high-voltage transmission grids, while the single node dynamics are described by the third-order chaotic power system. We studied the rich dynamics of the single third-order system via theoretical analysis and numerical simulations. The dynamic behaviors of the system are depicted by means of the phase portrait and Hopf bifurcation analysis. In addition, it is noted that real power networks usually have multi-area structure. Therefore, we analyze the cluster synchronization behavior of the multi-area power network. Furthermore, we presented an adaptive feedback control scheme for achieving cluster synchronization.

Even though we investigated these phenomena in a small-scale multi-area power network, we would like to emphasize that small-scale power network structure is indeed in reality.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under grant no. 11702195.