Research Article

Risk Evaluation of Urban Integrated Pipe Corridor Operation and Maintenance Based on Improved AHP-CIM Model

Table 3

Literature collection on the main risk factors of the integrated corridor O&M management process.

Serial numberRisk categoryLiterature sources

1Unclear management responsibilities and poor safety awarenessLiterature [10]
2The many management units make coordination difficultLiterature [11, 12]
3File management in disarrayLiterature [12]
4Inadequate and unregulated management standardsLiterature [13, 14]
5Improper handling by personnelLiterature [14]
6Invasion by persons, theftLiterature [14]
7Inadequate routine maintenanceLiterature [32]
8Poor O&M equipment and facilitiesLiterature [32]
9Technical immaturityLiterature [33]
10External forces, third party construction damageLiterature [34]
11Corroded pipes, substandard pipe weldingLiterature [35]
12Leaking pipesLiterature [34, 35]
13Quality of products and installations such as valves and fittingsLiterature [36]
14Uneven settlement of pipe corridor, structural stabilityLiterature [37]
15Interaction between pipelines and dangerous pipeline build-upLiterature [37]
16Fires, explosions, etc. caused by oil, gas, etc.Literature [38]
17Natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods and mudslidesLiterature [39]
18Urban construction, road excavationLiterature [40, 41]
19Air humidity, oxygen and toxic gas levels inside the corridorLiterature [38, 41]
20Waterproofing of pipe galleries, density of drainage outletsLiterature [42]
21Inadequate ventilation, lighting and firefighting facilitiesLiterature [43]
22Dynamic update of underground pipeline information is not timelyLiterature [44, 45]
23No linkage of information above and below groundLiterature [45]
24Insufficient intelligent controlLiterature [45]
25Poor communicationLiterature [45]