Research Article

Interest Rate Liberalization and Firm Leverage in China: Effects and Channels

Table 4

Average impact of the interest rate liberalization on firms’ leverage ratios.

Panel A: baseline regression results
VariablesLevLevSlevLlevSlevLlev
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)

Irlib1−0.4397−0.3549−0.0706
(−5.44)(−4.61)(−1.66)
Irlib2−0.2197−0.1773−0.0353
(−5.44)(−4.61)(−1.66)
Size0.06200.06200.02280.03840.02280.0384
(12.01)(12.01)(4.39)(14.93)(4.39)(14.93)
ROA0.01170.01170.01180.00250.01180.0025
(6.52)(6.52)(6.99)(2.51)(6.99)(2.51)
MB0.53060.53060.8266−0.16720.8266−0.1672
(1.96)(1.96)(3.31)(−1.18)(3.31)(−1.18)
NDTS0.06800.0680−0.00790.0720−0.00790.0720
(2.61)(2.61)(−0.33)(4.39)(−0.33)(4.39)
PPE−0.6571−0.6571−0.4986−0.1843−0.4986−0.1843
(−21.07)(−21.07)(−17.32)(−9.82)(−17.32)(−9.82)
Cflow−0.0152−0.01520.0491−0.06260.0491−0.0626
(−0.80)(−0.80)(2.64)(−5.96)(2.64)(−5.96)
Capex−0.1655−0.1655−0.35870.1793−0.35870.1793
(−5.01)(−5.01)(−10.73)(8.98)(−10.73)(8.98)
Grow0.02480.02480.0243−0.00210.0243−0.0021
(6.39)(6.39)(6.44)(−0.97)(6.44)(−0.97)
Meci−0.6457−0.6457−0.88980.1436−0.88980.1436
(−2.27)(−2.27)(−3.16)(0.82)(−3.16)(0.82)
Constant2.40912.24534.2671−1.39044.1349−1.4167
(1.85)(1.70)(3.32)(−1.73)(3.18)(−1.74)
Firm effectsYesYesYesYesYesYes
Year effectsYesYesYesYesYesYes
N179561795617956179561795617956
Adj-R20.14660.14660.09880.13300.09880.1330

Panel B: difference analysis results
Coefficientp-valueConclusion
Irlib1βIrlib1⟶Slevvs.βIrlib1⟶Llev = −0.3549vs. −0.0706p ≤ 0.001βIrlib1⟶Slev < βIrlib1⟶Llev
Irlib2βIrlib2⟶Slevvs.βIrlib2⟶Llev = −0.1773vs. −0.0353p ≤ 0.001βIrlib1⟶Slev < βIrlib1⟶Llev

Note. , , and indicate statistical significance at 1 percent, 5 percent, and 10 percent, respectively. Two alternative measures of interest rate liberalization are used in Table 4. The t-statistics are in parentheses, we calculate them on the basis of standard errors that are robust to heteroscedasticity.