Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Disease Markers
Volume 26, Issue 5-6, Pages 199-207

Evaluating the Prognostic Value of New Cardiovascular Biomarkers

Angela M. Wood1 and Philip Greenland2

1Department of Public Health and Primary Care and Department of Biostatistics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
2Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute and Department of Preventive Medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

Received 15 September 2009; Accepted 15 September 2009

Copyright © 2009 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


New predictors of cardiovascular outcomes are widely sought in research settings, and predictive tests are commonly recommended for routine use in cardiovascular clinical care. A number of multivariable scoring systems are in use around the world for assessment of a patient’s risk. While such scoring systems are often recommended for clinical use in medical practice guidelines, their actual use in medical care falls short of recommendations. Limitations in the predictive capacity of existing predictive models are recognized, including lack of predictive accuracy, lack of ability to separate those who develop events from those who do not, and risks and costs of the testing modalities. Biomarker research is actively developing new testing strategies trying to improve upon current approaches, but it is often unclear how to assess the incremental prognostic information that a new test provides. In this report, we discuss the statistical approaches that can be used to evaluate additive predictive value of new tests. We also consider clinical research examples to put this information into a practical context.