Disease Markers

Disease Markers / 2010 / Article

Open Access

Volume 28 |Article ID 656498 | https://doi.org/10.3233/DMA-2010-0681

Maximilian Schmid, Christoph Grimm, Heinz Leipold, Martin Knöfler, Peter Haslinger, Christian Egarter, "A Polymorphism of the Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor 2 (CRHR2) and Preterm Birth", Disease Markers, vol. 28, Article ID 656498, 6 pages, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3233/DMA-2010-0681

A Polymorphism of the Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor 2 (CRHR2) and Preterm Birth

Received12 Feb 2010
Accepted12 Feb 2010


Our aim was to investigate whether a genetic variation in the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 2 gene might be associated with preterm birth. In this case-control study we evaluated the G/A polymorphism (rs2267717) in intron 2 of the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 2 gene in one hundred women with preterm birth and one hundred healthy women with at least one uncomplicated full term pregnancy and no history of preterm birth. No significant correlation was found between the presence of the investigated polymorphism and preterm birth (p = 0.9, odds ratio 0.9 [Confidence interval 0.5–1.7]). A dose dependent association of the investigated polymorphism, in women with preterm birth, with gestational age at delivery (p = 0.003) and birth weight was observed (p = 0.0001). However, no association between IUGR (n=10) with either one of the investigated genotypes (p = 0.3) was found. Stratified analysis within case group (i.e. PPROM vs. non-PPROM) revealed no significant difference in genotype distribution (p = 0.6). In conclusion, the investigated polymorphism does not increase the risk for preterm birth overall but might modulate the length of pregnancy in a dose dependent fashion in a series of Caucasian women.

Copyright © 2010 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Order printed copiesOrder