Disease Markers

Disease Markers / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 35 |Article ID 214595 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/214595

Antonino Grassadonia, Nicola Tinari, Clara Natoli, Galit Yahalom, Stefano Iacobelli, "Circulating Autoantibodies to LGALS3BP: A Novel Biomarker for Cancer", Disease Markers, vol. 35, Article ID 214595, 6 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/214595

Circulating Autoantibodies to LGALS3BP: A Novel Biomarker for Cancer

Academic Editor: Grant Izmirlian
Received08 Jul 2013
Revised11 Oct 2013
Accepted11 Oct 2013
Published18 Nov 2013


Purpose. Circulating autoantibodies have been extensively investigated as possible markers for early diagnosis of cancer. The present study was carried out to investigate whether anti-LGALS3BP IgG autoantibodies could be classified as a biomarker for malignant tumors. Methods. An in-house developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect autoantibodies to LGALS3BP in sera from 71 patients with various types of cancers and 54 healthy subjects matched by age and gender. Results. Patients with cancer have significant higher circulating levels of anti-LGALS3BP antibodies as compared to control subjects ( ). The test has a sensitivity of 33% and a specificity of 98%. Conclusions. Anti-LGALS3BP IgG autoantibodies are a promising biomarker for malignant tumors and could play a role in the development of a multimarker assay for the early detection of cancer.

1. Introduction

Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for about 600,000 deaths in the United States in 2012 [1]. Despite significant improvements in treatment, early detection remains the most important prognostic factor predicting of better outcome [24]. Current cancer screening methods, including mammography for breast cancer, colonoscopy for colon cancer, computed tomography for lung cancer, prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer, and Papanicolaou stains for cervical cancer, have demonstrated some limitations in terms of sensitivity, specificity, complexity, cost, and compliance [5].

Serum tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) have been extensively studied for early cancer detection because of the simplicity and reliability of the tests used for their determination, such as western blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Unfortunately, they are transiently secreted and rapidly eliminated from blood circulation [6, 7] and usually reach a detectable concentration only in advanced stage of the disease [8].

Along with TAAs, autoantibodies are frequently detected in sera from patients affected by different types of neoplasms [9]. This finding has been interpreted as an attempt of the immune system to block invasion and spreading of cancer cells in the organism. Circulating autoantibodies have biological and biochemical characteristics that render them particularly suitable to screen subjects at cancer risk. In fact, they may develop early in the process of tumorigenesis, when premalignant or malignant cells begin to express altered molecules as a result of cell transformation [10, 11]. In addition, they can easily be detected in the serum because of the usual high concentration and long-time stability [9]. For these reasons, great efforts have been made in recent years to identify circulating autoantibodies directed against cancer-related proteins in order to build up tests for the early detection of neoplastic disease [1215].

In this study, we investigated the production of autoantibodies against lectin galactoside-binding soluble 3 binding protein (LGALS3BP) in patients affected by different types of cancer. LGALS3BP, also known as 90K or Mac-2 BP [16], has been largely regarded as a TAA, since it is present at elevated concentrations in the blood of cancer patients and is overexpressed in the vast majority of cancer tissues [17]. Both high serum and tumor levels of LGALS3BP have been associated with a poor outcome in patients with different types of neoplasms [1821]. LGALS3BP has also been implicated in cancer progression by modulating tumor cell adhesion processes. In fact, it can bind important molecules associated with the membrane of tumor cells, such as galectin-3, galectin-1, and β1-integrins [16, 22, 23]. Additionally, LGALS3BP can interact with extracellular matrix proteins such as collagen, fibronectin, and laminin [23, 24].

Here we show that patients with different types of cancer, but not healthy subjects, develop autoantibodies against LGALS3BP. This finding discloses the capability of LGALS3BP to trigger a humoral immune response in cancer patients and provides the basis for further investigation on a possible use of anti-LGALS3BP antibodies as biomarkers for early diagnosis of cancer.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

The study population consisted of 71 patients with different types of cancers, 15 gastrointestinal cancers, 13 non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC), 12 breast cancers, 10 neuroendocrine tumors (NET), 10 urogenital tract cancers, 7 melanomas, and 4 others (2 gliomas, 1 tongue cancer, and 1 osteosarcoma). All patients were in stage IV disease. Fifty-four healthy donors were also included as controls. Patients characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

N Median age (years)Range (years)MalesFemales


GI: gastrointestinal cancer; NSCLC: non-small-cell lung cancer; BC: breast cancer; NET: neuroendocrine tumors; UG: urogenital tract cancer; M: melanoma.

All blood samples were obtained with donor’s consent. Serum was collected from total blood and stored at −20°C after adding 0.01% sodium azide.

2.2. Human Recombinant LGALS3BP

Human recombinant LGALS3BP was immunoaffinity-purified from serum-free supernatant of human embryonic kidney EBNA-293 cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) transfected with LGALS3BP cDNA [23].

2.3. Measurement of LGALS3BP Autoantibodies

LGALS3BP autoantibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Ninety-six well microtiter plates (Nalge Nunc, Denmark) were coated with recombinant purified LGALS3BP protein (5 μg/mL in PBS) at 4°C overnight. The plate was saturated with 1% BSA and 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS (saturation buffer) at 37°C for 2 h and then incubated with 100 μL of serum from healthy donors or patients at 37°C for 1 h. The serum was diluted 1 : 100 in saturation buffer. After 3 washes with 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS (washing buffer), a second incubation was performed with 100 μL of biotin-conjugated anti-human IgG (Sigma, St Louis, Mo, USA), diluted 1 : 2000 in saturation buffer, at 37°C for 1 h. After washing, a third incubation was performed with peroxidase-conjugated ExtrAvidin (Sigma, St Louis, Mo, USA) diluted 1 : 4000 in saturation buffer, at 37°C for 45 min. After washing, 100 μL of TMB substrate was added to each well and the plate was shaken at room temperature for 15 min. Eventually, the reaction was stopped by adding 100 μL of 1 M H2SO4/well and color revealed by reading absorbance at 450 nm in an automatic ELISA reader.

2.4. Measurement of LGALS3BP

To measure serum concentration of LGALS3BP a commercially available ELISA kit (Diesse, Siena, Italy) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results were expressed in μg/mL.

2.5. Western Blot Analyses

Purified human recombinant LGALS3BP (10 μg/well) was separated by 8% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and transferred to nitrocellulose using standard procedures. Membrane was saturated in blocking buffer phosphate buffered saline with 0.05% Tween-20 (PBS-T), 5% low-fat milk, 1% BSA and at 4°C overnight. After washing in PBS-T, membrane was incubated with serum from controls or patients affected by cancer, diluted in an equal volume with PBS-T, at room temperature for 1 h. After washing in PBS-T, membrane was incubated with biotinylated anti-human IgG (Sigma, St Louis, Mo, USA) diluted 1 : 1000 in blocking buffer at room temperature for 1 h and then with ExtrAvidin Peroxidase (Sigma, St Louis, Mo, USA) 1 : 500 in Blocking Buffer for 30 min. To identify the presence of antibodies bound to LGALS3BP, the colorimetric substrate DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine) was added to the membrane for 10 min.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

Each sample was assayed in triplicate and the mean value was used for statistical analyses. The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between groups were tested with the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. The normal upper cut-off value of anti-LGALS3BP antibody in sera was set at the value of the mean + 2SD of the absorbance in 54 healthy donors. Differences in the proportion over the cut-off limit were evaluated by Fisher’s exact test. Correlations were estimated using the Spearman rank-correlation coefficient .

3. Results

Patients affected by different types of cancers showed significant increased levels of LGALS3BP autoantibodies ( ) compared to healthy subjects (Figure 1(a)). The specific binding of antibodies to LGALS3BP was confirmed in western blot, where the presence of anti-LGALS3BP IgG was detected as two bands at about 97 KDa and 66 KDa, the exact size of the protein in its full length and cleaved form, respectively (Figure 1(b)). Among patients, NSCLC, gastrointestinal cancer, urogenital tract cancer, and NET reached the highest levels of autoantibodies, while there was no significant increase in breast cancer and melanoma (Table 2).

N OD (Mean ± SD) Number of patients over cut-off limit (%)

Controls54 1/54 (2)
Cancers71 <0.001 26/71 (37)<0.001
 GI15 0.0235/15 (33) 0.001
 NSCLC13 0.0136/13 (46)<0.001
 BC12 NS3/12 (25) 0.017
 NET10 <0.0015/10 (50)<0.001
 UG10 0.0015/10 (50)<0.001
 M7 NS1/7 (14)NS
 Others4 NS1/4 (25)NS

GI: gastrointestinal cancer; NSCLC: non-small-cell lung cancer; BC: breast cancer; NET: neuroendocrine tumors; UG: urogenital tract cancer; M: melanoma. *Mann-Whitney test; **Fisher's exact test; NS: not significant.

Setting the normal upper cut-off limit of ELISA at OD 0.99 (the mean + 2SD of the absorbance in sera from healthy individuals), the assay showed a sensitivity of 33% (26/71 patients were positive) and a specificity of 98% (only 1 out of 54 controls was positive). All cancer groups, but melanoma, showed autoantibody levels significantly above the cut-off limit (Table 2).

Serum levels of LGALS3BP were also determined. As expected, the protein was significantly higher in patients with cancer compared to normal subjects (13.19 versus 6.36 μg/mL, ) (Table 3), but values did not correlate with the levels of autoantibodies (data not shown).

N g/mL (Mean ± SD)


GI: gastrointestinal cancer; NSCLC: non-small-cell lung cancer; BC: breast cancer; NET: neuroendocrine tumors; UG: urogenital tract cancer; M: melanoma.

4. Discussion

Using ELISA technique, we show that LGALS3BP is able to elicit host immune response with IgG autoantibodies production in patients affected by different types of cancer. Anti-LGALS3BP IgG concentrations were higher in patients with NSCLC, gastrointestinal cancer, urogenital tract cancer, and NET than in those with breast cancer and melanoma, but the number of patients in each subgroup was insufficient to yield a statistically reliable comparison.

It is generally accepted that tumor proteins perceived as nonself by the immune system and able to trigger an immune response are often overexpressed [25], mutated [26], misfolded [27], or endowed with posttranslational changes, such as alterations of glycosylation and phosporylation [28, 29]. Consistently, LGALS3BP may evoke autoantibody production because it is overexpressed in cancer cells, and also because it may carry posttranslational alterations in its glycidic moiety. Qualitative and quantitative changes in O- and N-glycosylation of proteins are frequent events in malignancies [30, 31] and differences in the glycosylation pattern of LGALS3BP have been reported in some cancer cell lines [24].

Finalistically, antitumor directed antibodies are generated in order to halt tumor initiation and progression. As this process initiates early in cancerogenesis, in a preclinical phase of the disease, autoantibodies production has been considered a useful biomarker for early cancer diagnosis [3235]. In this study, the serum levels of anti-LGALS3BP IgG detected in cancer patients were not correlated with those of LGALS3BP, indicating that even small amount of the protein, as expected in the initial phase of cancer growth, may generate high concentrations of autoantibodies. This evidence suggests a possible role for anti-LGALS3BP IgG in the early detection of cancer.

Although it is not possible to exclude that the presence of autoantibodies might affect the correct quantification of LGALS3BP by ELISA, the identification of anti-LGALS3BP IgG in western blot indicates that the epitopes recognized by these autoantibodies are different from those recognized by the antibody used in ELISA. In fact, western blot performed under reducing conditions can detect only autoantibodies directed to epitopes expressed on the primary structure of LGALS3BP, while the monoclonal antibody contained in the commercially available ELISA kit, known as SP2, recognizes a conformational epitope shaped in the native form of the protein and, for this reason, is not suitable for western blotting.

In cancer patients, autoantibodies are frequently directed against cellular proteins that play key roles in tumor progression, including molecules involved in cell cycle, signal transduction, proliferation, and apoptosis [3638]. As a consequence, the identification of the molecular target of autoantibodies might be of relevance in designing new antitumor agents. We can, therefore, speculate that LGALS3BP could be a candidate for targeted therapies against cancer.

In the past few years, the growing interest in autoantibodies as a possible tool for the early diagnosis of cancer and the identification of new targets for molecular therapy has made the development of high-throughput techniques such as SEREX (serological analysis of tumor antigens by recombinant cDNA expression cloning), phage display, protein microarray, SERPA (serological proteome analysis), and MAPPing (multiple affinity protein profiling) [39] able to detect simultaneously multiple autoantibodies and their cognate TAAs. With these methods, several new targets have been identified, but collectively single antigens have shown low sensitivity and specificity to be used in clinical screening [40]. To increase sensitivity, autoantibody diagnostic tests combining two or more TAAs [4143] or evaluating well-known biomarkers in combination with autoantibodies [44] have been developed. For example, a large screening study of high-risk individuals for lung cancer has validated a test measuring autoantibody levels against a panel of six TAAs (p53, NY-ESO-1, CAGE, GBU4-5, Annexin 1, and SOX2) [41]. In another study, the combination of p53 autoantibodies and CA125 levels increased sensitivity for ovarian cancer from 73.8% (CA125) to 85.7% (CA 125 plus p53 autoantibodies) [44]. The determination of anti-LGALS3BP IgG presented in this study showed a very high specificity (98%), but a low sensitivity (33%), comparable to that reported for autoantibodies against single TAA, ranging between 10% and 30% [40]. Therefore, our anti-LGALS3BP ELISA lacks sufficient sensitivity to be used in early cancer diagnosis. Nevertheless, the determination of autoantibodies against LGALS3BP might be useful to increase the sensitivity of tests combining multiple autoantibodies. Preliminary results indicate that using a set of different autoantibodies combined with autoantibodies for LGALS3BP will increase the sensitivity for breast cancer patients to 50% and maintain the high specificity (98%) [45]. These preliminary results should be tested for other types of cancers as well.

In summary, our study demonstrated the presence of autoantibodies against LGALS3BP in the serum of patients with different types of cancers. These autoantibodies may be used in developing screening tests for early-stage cancer detection.


  1. R. Siegel, D. Naishadham, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2013,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 11–30, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. F. A. Coumans, S. Siesling, and L. W. Terstappen, “Detection of cancer before distant metastasis,” BMC Cancer, vol. 13, no. 1, article 283, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. W. S. Atkin, R. Edwards, I. Kralj-Hans et al., “Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 375, no. 9726, pp. 1624–1633, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. Levin, D. A. Lieberman, B. McFarland et al., “Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a Joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology,” Gastroenterology, vol. 134, no. 5, pp. 1570–1595, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and O. W. Brawley, “Cancer screening in the United States, 2012: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 129–142, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. G. Wahrenbrock and A. Varki, “Multiple hepatic receptors cooperate to eliminate secretory mucins aberrantly entering the bloodstream: are circulating cancer mucins the “tip of the iceberg”?” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 2433–2441, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. H. Wandall, O. Blixt, M. A. Tarp et al., “Cancer biomarkers defined by autoantibody signatures to aberrant O-glycopeptide epitopes,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1306–1313, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. J. Duffy, D. Evoy, and E. W. McDermott, “CA 15-3: uses and limitation as a biomarker for breast cancer,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 411, no. 23-24, pp. 1869–1874, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. S. Anderson and J. LaBaer, “The sentinel within: exploiting the immune system for cancer biomarkers,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1123–1133, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. O. J. Finn, “Immune response as a biomarker for cancer detection and a lot more,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 12, Article ID 058157, pp. 1288–1290, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. M. Tan, “Autoantibodies as reporters identifying aberrant cellular mechanisms in tumorigenesis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 108, no. 10, pp. 1411–1415, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. S. Anderson, N. Ramachandran, J. Wong et al., “Application of protein microarrays for multiplexed detection of antibodies to tumor antigens in breast cancer,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1490–1499, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. P. J. Mintz, J. Kim, K.-A. Do et al., “Fingerprinting the circulating repertoire of antibodies from cancer patients,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. R. Pereira-Faca, R. Kuick, E. Puravs et al., “Identification of 14-3-3θ as an antigen that induces a humoral response in lung cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 24, pp. 12000–12006, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. N. Ramachandran, J. V. Raphael, E. Hainsworth et al., “Next-generation high-density self-assembling functional protein arrays,” Nature Methods, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 535–538, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Grassadonia, N. Tinari, I. Iurisci et al., “90K (Mac-2 BP) and galectins in tumor progression and metastasis,” Glycoconjugate Journal, vol. 19, no. 7–9, pp. 551–556, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Iacobelli, E. Arno, P. Sismondi et al., “Measurement of a breast cancer associated antigen detected by monoclonal antibody SP-2 in sera of cancer patients,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 19–30, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Iacobelli, P. Sismondi, M. Giai et al., “Prognostic value of a novel circulating serum 90K antigen in breast cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 172–176, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. G. Zeimet, C. Natoli, M. Herold et al., “Circulating immunostimulatory protein 90K and soluble interleukin-2-receptor in human ovarian cancer,” The International Journal of Cancer, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 34–38, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  20. A. Marchetti, N. Tinari, F. Buttitta et al., “Expression of 90K (Mac-2 BP) correlates with distant metastasis and predicts survival in stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 2535–2539, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  21. N. Tinari, R. Lattanzio, P. Querzoli et al., “High expression of 90K (Mac-2 BP) is associated with poor survival in node-negative breast cancer patients not receiving adjuvant systemic therapies,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 333–338, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. H. Inohara, S. Akahani, K. Koths, and A. Raz, “Interactions between galectin-3 and Mac-2-binding protein mediate cell- cell adhesion,” Cancer Research, vol. 56, no. 19, pp. 4530–4534, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  23. T. Sasaki, C. Brakebusch, J. Engel, and R. Timpl, “Mac-2 binding protein is a cell-adhesive protein of the extracellular matrix which self-assembles into ring-like structures and binds β1 integrins, collagens and fibronectin,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1606–1613, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. T. A. Ulmer, V. Keeler, L. Loh et al., “Tumor-associated antigen 90K/Mac-2-binding protein: possible role in colon cancer,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 1351–1366, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y.-T. Chen, M. J. Scanlan, U. Sahin et al., “A testicular antigen aberrantly expressed in human cancers detected by autologous antibody screening,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1914–1918, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. T. Soussi, “p53 Antibodies in the sera of patients with various types of cancer: a review,” Cancer Research, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 1777–1788, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  27. U. Schubert, L. C. Antón, J. Gibbs, C. C. Norbury, J. W. Yewdell, and J. R. Bennink, “Rapid degradation of a large fraction of newly synthesized proteins by proteasomes,” Nature, vol. 404, no. 6779, pp. 770–774, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. Blume-Jensen and T. Hunter, “Oncogenic kinase signalling,” Nature, vol. 411, no. 6835, pp. 355–365, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Hakomori, “Tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 2, Article ID 040184, pp. 103–126, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S.-I. Hakomori, “Tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens defining tumor malignancy: basis for development of anti-cancer vaccines,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 491, pp. 369–402, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  31. K. O. Lloyd, “Philip Levine award lecture. Blood group antigens as markers for normal differentiation and malignant change in human tissues,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 129–139, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  32. M. Caron, G. Choquet-Kastylevsky, and R. Joubert-Caron, “Cancer immunomics using autoantibody signatures for biomarker discovery,” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1115–1122, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. F. M. Brichory, D. E. Misek, A.-M. Yim et al., “An immune response manifested by the common occurrence of annexins I and II autoantibodies and high circulating levels of IL-6 in lung cancer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 17, pp. 9824–9829, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. F. Le Naour, D. E. Misek, M. C. Krause et al., “Proteomics-based identification of RS/DJ-1 as a novel circulating tumor antigen in breast cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 3328–3335, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  35. M. J. Nam, J. Madoz-Gurpide, H. Wang et al., “Molecular profiling of the immune response in colon cancer using protein microarrays: occurrence of autoantibodies to ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L3,” Proteomics, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 2108–2115, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. Hirohashi, T. Torigoe, S. Inoda et al., “The functioning antigens: beyond just as the immunological targets,” Cancer Science, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 798–806, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. F. F. Madrid, “Autoantibodies in breast cancer sera: candidate biomarkers and reporters of tumorigenesis,” Cancer Letters, vol. 230, no. 2, pp. 187–198, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. F. Ullah and M. Aatif, “The footprints of cancer development: cancer biomarkers,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 193–200, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. T. Tan, J. Low, S. G. Lim, and M. C. M. Chung, “Serum autoantibodies as biomarkers for early cancer detection,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 276, no. 23, pp. 6880–6904, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. C. A. Casiano, M. Mediavilla-Varela, and E. M. Tan, “Tumor-associated antigen arrays for the serological diagnosis of cancer,” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1745–1759, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. Boyle, C. J. Chapman, S. Holdenrieder et al., “Clinical validation of an autoantibody test for lung cancer,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 383–389, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Chatterjee, S. Mohapatra, A. Ionan et al., “Diagnostic markers of ovarian cancer by high-throughput antigen cloning and detection on arrays,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 1181–1190, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. X. Wang, J. Yu, A. Sreekumar et al., “Autoantibody signatures in prostate cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 12, pp. 1224–1235, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. D. Lu, E. Kuhn, R. E. Bristow et al., “Comparison of candidate serologic markers for type I and type II ovarian cancer,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 560–566, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. G. Yahalom, D. Weiss, I. Novikov et al., “An antibody-based blood test utilizing a panel of biomarkers as a new method for improved breast cancer diagnosis,” Biomarkers in Cancer. In press. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Antonino Grassadonia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1392 Views | 680 Downloads | 6 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.