Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Disease Markers
Volume 35 (2013), Issue 5, Pages 573–579
Research Article

CD90- (Thy-1-) High Selection Enhances Reprogramming Capacity of Murine Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

1Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
2Department of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
3Department of Surgery and Institute for Clinical Research, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan
4Department of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Received 18 June 2013; Revised 7 September 2013; Accepted 12 September 2013

Academic Editor: Chao Hung Hung

Copyright © 2013 Koichi Kawamoto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Background. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), including adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSC), are multipotent and can differentiate into various cell types possessing unique immunomodulatory features. Several clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and possible efficacy of MSCs in organ transplantation. Thus, stem cell therapy is promising for tolerance induction. In this study, we assessed the reprogramming capacity of murine ADSCs and found that CD90 (Thy-1), originally discovered as a thymocyte antigen, could be a useful marker for cell therapy. Method. Murine ADSCs were isolated from B6 mice, sorted using a FACSAria cell sorter by selection of or , and then transduced with four standard factors (4F; Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc). Results. Unsorted, -sorted, and -sorted murine ADSCs were reprogrammed using standard 4F transduction. ADSCs showed increased numbers of alkaline phosphatase-positive colonies compared with ADSCs. The relative reprogramming efficiencies of unsorted, -sorted, and -sorted ADSCs were 100%, 116.5%, and 74.7%, respectively. cells were more responsive to reprogramming. Conclusion. ADSCs had greater reprogramming capacity than ADSCs, suggesting that ADSCs have heterogeneous subpopulations. Thus, selection presents an effective strategy to isolate a highly suppressive subpopulation for stem cell-based tolerance induction therapy.

1. Introduction

Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells can be directly generated from fibroblast cultures by expression of four factors (4F), including octamer-binding transcription factor 4, sex-determining region Y-box 2, Kruppel-like factor 4, and myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog [1]. Although these factors present attractive sources for stem cell therapy, the mechanisms by which they are generated are not fully understood. The inefficiency of iPS cell generation has prompted the development of two contending models, namely, the stochastic and elite models. A recent multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring cell study suggested the greater utility of the elite model over the stochastic model [2]. In either model, stem cells or progenitor cells isolated for experimental or therapeutic research are usually heterogeneous populations; therefore, a more favorable subfraction for use in stem cell therapy may exist. Indeed, several reports have suggested that the differentiation stage of the starting cell line has a critical influence on the efficiency of reprogramming into iPS cells in hematopoiesis [3]. Immature cell populations, such as linc-Kit+Sca1+CD48CD150+CD34 (lack of lineage/Hardy-Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma viral oncogene homolog/spinocerebellar ataxia/cluster of differentiation 48/150+/34) hematopoietic stem cells, in general give rise to iPS cells at higher efficiencies than terminally differentiated cell types. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated that adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) are more capable of forming bone both in vitro and in vivo than in cells [4]. CD90 (Thy-1) is a 25–37-kDa glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored glycoprotein expressed mainly in leukocytes that have been used as murine pan T-cell markers, like CD2, CD5, and CD28.

Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which represent a nonhematopoietic cell population, can differentiate into mesenchymal tissues (i.e., bone, cartilage, or fat) [5, 6]; they were first isolated from bone marrow and later from nonmarrow tissues, including umbilical cord blood and adipose tissue [5, 6]. Immunologically, MCSs are known to be less immunogenic because of, at least in part, the lack of surface-expressed human leukocyte antigens [5]. Moreover, they have been shown to possess anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects both in murine and human models of diabetes [7, 8]. Thus, the immunoregulatory properties of MSCs are appealing, because they inhibit T-cell proliferation and differentiation of monocytes to dendritic cells, modulate B-cell functions, and suppress natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Solid organ transplantation is an established and useful treatment option for end-stage organ failure. Despite excellent short-term results, long-term survival of transplanted grafts has not improved accordingly because of graft rejection, graft fibrosis, or side effects of immunosuppressants. The aim of stem cell therapy for solid organ transplantation is to prevent or treat acute rejection and to involve autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation into patients, either through local delivery or systemic infusion. Currently, there are over 100 ongoing clinical trials to evaluate the utility of MSCs, especially in kidney transplantation [911].

ADSCs have been shown to consist of heterogeneous subpopulations; therefore, we hypothesized that ADSCs might exhibit increased reprogramming capacities and subsequently have better immunoregulatory effects. Hence, the aim of the present study was to compare the reprogramming capacity of sorted murine ADSCs. Our data demonstrated that selection improved the reprogramming capacity of murine ADSCs, suggesting that ADSCs could help prevent graft rejection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. ADSC Isolation

Murine ADSCs were isolated from B6 mice as previously described but with slight modifications [7]. Briefly, adipose tissue was obtained from the inguinal fat pads, washed with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (D-PBS; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 50 U/mL of penicillin and 50 μg/mL of streptomycin (PSM; Invitrogen), and then cut into fine pieces, which were incubated with D-PBS containing 1.0 mg/mL of Clostridium histolyticum collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in a 37°C shaking incubator for 1 h. The digested tissue was filtered through sterile 70-μm nylon mesh, centrifuged at 430 ×g for 5 min, and resuspended in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and PSM.

2.2. Cell Sorting

Murine ADSCs were washed with D-PBS and treated with Accutase reagent (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) in a 37°C incubator for 2-3 min to dissociate the cells, which were then resuspended in staining media [D-PBS supplemented with FBS (1%) and EDTA (2 mM)]. Next, the cells were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse CD34 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-mouse CD31, eFluor450 antimouse CD45, and allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-mouse CD90.2 for 60 min at 4°C. The cells were then washed with staining media, stained with 7-aminoactinomycin D to exclude dead cells, and sorted using the FACSAria cell sorter (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) [12]. The particular phenotypic subsets of and ADSCs, based on CD31, CD45, and CD90 expression, were evaluated by multicolor analysis and sorted by adequate gating.

2.3. Lentiviral Preparation

To prepare the lentiviruses, human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293Ta cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and PSM. Then, the cells were seeded at 5.0 × 106 cells per 100 mm dish 1 day before viral transduction. Fugene 6 transfection reagent (22.5 μL; Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was diluted with 500 μL of DMEM and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Plasmid DNA (2.5 μg) was added to the mixture, which was incubated for an additional 15 min at room temperature. Then, the culture media was replaced with fresh DMEM supplemented 10% FBS and the DNA/Fugene 6 mixture was added dropwise onto the HEK-293Ta cells. The medium was replaced after 24 h. After an additional 48 h, virus-containing supernatants, derived from the HEK-293Ta cultures, were filtered through a 0.22-μL cellulose–acetate filter and analyzed without being frozen.

2.4. Lentiviral Transduction

Sorted and cells were plated onto 6-well culture plates at a density of 1.0 × 105 cells/well, respectively. After incubation for 24 h, the culture medium was retrieved and viral supernatants were added to each well. The next day, the cells were washed with complete medium three times. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were mitotically inactivated by the addition of 10 μg/mL of mitomycin C (MMC; Nacalai Tesque Inc., Kyoto, Japan) for 90 min and then washed with D-PBS three times. The cells were then cultured with complete medium for at least 2 h, trypsinized, counted, and plated on gelatin-coated 60 mm dishes at a density of 5.0 × 105 cells/well. On posttransduction day 5, the cells were trypsinized; suspended in DMEM supplemented with 15% (v/v) FBS, PSM, 1-mM sodium pyruvate (Invitrogen), 10−4 M 2-mercaptoethanol (Nacalai Tesque, Inc.), nonessential amino acid solution, and 1,000 U/mL of leukemia inhibitory factor; after which they were counted. Then, 1000 cells were transferred to MMC-treated MEF feeder cells. On post-transduction day 30, alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining was performed to assess reprogramming efficiency.

2.5. AP Staining

4F-transduced ADSCs were stained using an AP staining kit (Muto Pure Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan) following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. Briefly, cultured cells were rinsed twice with D-PBS and then fixed for 5 s in ice-cold methanol. Then, the cells were washed with tap water, stained with AP solution at 37° for 120 min, and washed again with running water. The number of AP+ colonies were manually inspected and counted.

3. Results

Figure 1 describes the experimental protocol used in this study. First, we evaluated the reprogramming capacity of unsorted ADSCs. As shown in Figure 2, parental ADSC showed no colonies and AP staining was negative (negative control). However, 4F transduction resulted in ADSC colony formation. After culturing for 30 days, the cells were stained with AP to test iPS cell pluripotency. AP staining was positive in all colonies. These results clearly demonstrated that murine ADSCs can be reprogrammed using standard 4F. Next we used sorted ADSCs to assess the reprogramming capacities of and ADSCs. As shown in Figure 3(a), the CD90 marker was widely expressed on the surfaces of the CD31-CD45-CD34-ADSCs. After 24 h of incubation, sorted or ADSCs became attached to the culture dishes (Figure 3(b)) and both showed similar morphologies. Next, we assessed the effect of in vitro culture. As shown in Figure 4(a), 7-day culture resulted in the reexpression of CD90 even after sorted ADSCs. These results suggest that sorted cells might be transduced as soon as possible.

Figure 1: Lentiviral-mediated transfer of four iPS cell factor genes in murine ADSCs. A schematic representation of the experiment is shown. Cells were transduced with four factors (4F) after 24 h of incubation. Then, 4F-transduced cells were passaged to MMC-treated MEF feeder cells on day 5. The number of reprogrammed iPS colonies was assessed on posttransduction day 30 by AP staining.
Figure 2: 4F transduction resulted in iPS colony formation in unsorted murine ADSCs. Phase (a and c) and AP staining (b and d) of pre- and post- (c and d) transduction were shown.
Figure 3: and sorting. (a) Gates for   (P7) and   (P8) are shown. (b) Sorted cells showed similar morphologies 24 h after sorting. Then, the cells were transduced with 4F.
Figure 4: Phenotypical analysis after in vitro culture of sorted ADSCs.

To show the successful induction of the undifferentiated state, we employed immunocytochemistry of Oct4 and SSEA1. As shown in Figure 5, colonies were positive for Oct4 and SSEA1. Sorted and 4F-transduced ADSCs also exhibited colony formation. As shown in Figures 6(a) and 6(b), morphologically distinct colonies were visible in both and 4F-transduced ADSCs on posttransduction day 14. On posttransduction day 30, the colonies were stained with AP. There were AP+ colonies in both groups, although the ADSCs tended to form larger colonies than ADSCs (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)). As shown in Figure 7, ADSCs exhibited more AP+ colonies than ADSCs. The reprogramming efficiencies of unsorted, -sorted, and -sorted ADSCs were 100%, 116.5%, and 74.7%, respectively.

Figure 5: Immunocytochemistry of iPS colonies.
Figure 6: Colony formation of the sorted cells. Phase (a and b) and alkaline phosphatase staining (c and d) of (a and c) and (b and d) are shown.
Figure 7: Relative reprogramming efficiency of sorted cells compared with unsorted controls.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated that murine ADSCs can be reprogrammed by standard 4F transduction. Furthermore, iPS cell formation was also observed in CD90-based sorted cells and the sorting resulted in enhanced reprogramming capacity of murine ADSCs compared with ADSCs with regard to colony number. Moreover, there was a trend in the association between CD90 expression level and individual colony size. These results clearly demonstrated that ADSCs have heterogeneous subpopulations and that the ADSCs present favorable candidates for the application of clinical stem cell therapy.

The importance of CD90 in oncogenesis or properties of cancer stem cells has been reported [13]. CD90 expression reportedly has prognostic values in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, because higher CD90 expression was significantly associated with a strong family history of ESCC and higher incidences of lymph node metastasis. However, the importance of CD90 expression in MSCs has not been fully elucidated; therefore, our next project is to clarify the mechanisms of CD90-mediated immunomodulatory effects. Of note, recent study reported that CD90-expressing niche stromal cells would support hematopoiesis [14].

Stem cell therapy for autoimmune disease is also well described. In a murine inflammatory bowel disease model, ADSCs alleviated experimental colitis by inhibiting inflammatory and autoimmune responses [15]. In mice, Thy-1 is also expressed by thymocytes, peripheral T cells, myoblasts, epidermal cells, and keratinocytes.

We and others previously reported that it is possible to reprogram murine and human cells to pluripotency by direct transfection of mature double-stranded microRNAs without viral vectors [1618]. These viral-free strategies present effective methods for future stem cell therapy.

Currently, studies are underway to compare the immunoregulatory properties of viral-free strategies both in vitro and in vivo.


Lentiviral vectors (CSII-CMV-mOct3/4-IRES2-Venus, CSII-CMV-mSox2-IRES2-Venus, CSII-CMV-mKlf4-IRES2-Venus, CSII-CMV-mcMyc-IRES2-Venus, pCAG-HIVgp, and pCAG-VSV-G-RSV-Rev) were kindly provided by the Hiroyuki Miyoshi (RIKEN; The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, Tsukuba, Japan).


  1. K. Takahashi and S. Yamanaka, “Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 663–676, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Wakao, M. Kitada, Y. Kuroda et al., “Multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (Muse) cells are a primary source of induced pluripotent stem cells in human fibroblasts,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 24, pp. 9875–9880, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Eminli, A. Foudi, M. Stadtfeld et al., “Differentiation stage determines potential of hematopoietic cells for reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 968–976, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. T. Chung, C. Liu, J. S. Hyun et al., “CD90 (Thy-1)-positive selection enhances osteogenic capacity of human adipose-derived stromal cells,” Tissue Engineering A, vol. 19, pp. 989–997, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  5. K. Le Blanc and D. Mougiakakos, “Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells and the innate immune system,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 383–396, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Konno, A. Hamabe, S. Hasegawa et al., “Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and regenerative medicine,” Development, Growth and Differentiation, vol. 55, pp. 309–318, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  7. Y. Ohmura, M. Tanemura, N. Kawaguchi et al., “Combined transplantation of pancreatic islets and adipose tissue-derived stem cells enhances the survival and insulin function of islet grafts in diabetic mice,” Transplantation, vol. 90, no. 12, pp. 1366–1373, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Y. Yeung, K. L. Seeberger, T. Kin et al., “Human mesenchymal stem cells protect human islets from pro-inflammatory cytokines,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, Article ID e38189, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Tan, W. Wu, X. Xu et al., “Induction therapy with autologous mesenchymal stem cells in living-related kidney transplants: a randomized controlled trial,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 307, no. 11, pp. 1169–1177, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Peng, M. Ke, L. Xu et al., “Donor-derived mesenchymal stem cells combined with low-dose tacrolimus prevent acute rejection after renal transplantation: a clinical pilot study,” Transplantation, vol. 95, pp. 161–168, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. E. Reinders, J. W. de Fijter, H. Roelofs et al., “Autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells for the treatment of allograft rejection after renal transplantation: results of a phase I study,” Stem Cells Translational Medicine, vol. 2, pp. 107–111, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Nishikawa, M. Konno, A. Hamabe et al., “Aldehyde dehydrogenase high gastric cancer stem cells are resistant to chemotherapy,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 42, pp. 1437–1442, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  13. K. H. Tang, Y. D. Dai, M. Tong et al., “A CD90(+) tumor-initiating cell population with an aggressive signature and metastatic capacity in esophageal cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 73, pp. 2322–2332, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  14. C. K. Chan, P. Lindau, W. Jiang et al., “Clonal precursor of bone, cartilage, and hematopoietic niche stromal cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 31, pp. 12643–12648, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. A. González, E. Gonzalez-Rey, L. Rico, D. Büscher, and M. Delgado, “Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviate experimental colitis by inhibiting inflammatory and autoimmune responses,” Gastroenterology, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 978–989, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Okita, M. Nakagawa, H. Hyenjong, T. Ichisaka, and S. Yamanaka, “Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors,” Science, vol. 322, no. 5903, pp. 949–953, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. Miyoshi, H. Ishii, H. Nagano et al., “Reprogramming of mouse and human cells to pluripotency using mature microRNAs,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 633–638, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. Anokye-Danso, C. M. Trivedi, D. Juhr et al., “Highly efficient miRNA-mediated reprogramming of mouse and human somatic cells to pluripotency,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 376–388, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus