Disease Markers / 2013 / Article / Tab 4 / Research Article
The MTHFR 677T Allele May Influence the Severity and Biochemical Risk Factors of Alzheimer’s Disease in an Egyptian Population Table 4 Distribution of MTHFR 677C>T genotypes and their allelic frequencies in Alzheimer’s cases and controls from different ethnic populations.
Country (population)a
Reference
No. of cases (no. of controls) Distribution of rs1801133 SNP genotypesb Frequency of T allele C/C C/T T/T Poland (Caucasian) [20 ] 99 (100) 53.5 (55.0) 38.4 (38.0) 8.1 (7.0) 27.3c (26.0) Iran (others) [21 ] 117 (125) 48.7 (67.2) 37.6 (26.4) 13.7 (6.4) 32.5d (19.6) N. Ireland (Caucasian) [22 ] 83 (71) 71.1 (70.4) 24.1 (26.8) 4.8 (2.8) 33.7d (16.2) China (East Asia) [23 ] 104 (100) 48.1 (60.8) 36.5 (36.2) 15.4 (3.0) 33.7d (21.2) Brazil (others) [24 ] 30 (29) 36.7 (51.7) 56.7 (37.9) 6.6 (10.4) 35.0d (29.7) Egypt (current study) 43 (32) 41.9 (62.5) 39.5 (31.2) 18.6 (6.3) 38.4
c (21.9) China (East Asia) [25 ] 105 (102) 37.1 (33.3) 42.9 (48.0) 20.0 (18.7) 41.4c (42.6) United States (Caucasian) [26 ] 124 (97) 33.0 (38.0) 50.5 (59.9) 16.5 (11.1) 41.8c (36.5) Japan (East Asian) [27 ] 194 (379) 33.0 (38.0) 50.5 (50.9) 16.5 (11.1) 41.8c (36.5) Israel (others) [28 ] 49 (40) 24.5 (37.5) 63.3 (40.0) 12.2 (22.2) 45.7c (42.5) Italy (Caucasian) [29 ] 231 (137) 27.7 (28.5) 52.0 (47.4) 20.3 (24.1) 46.3c (47.8) China (East Asian) [30 ] 386 (375) 46.4 (24.0) 32.4 (45.9) 44.4 (30.1) 55.6c (53.1) Sweden (Caucasian) [31 ] 204 (172) 48.0 (48.3) 44.1 (39.5) 7.9 (12.2) 59.8 (32.0) Korea (East Asian) [32 ] 86 (625) 12.8 (19.5) 50.0 (53.1) 37.2 (27.4) 62.2c (53.9)
Abbreviations. AD: Alzheimer’s disease, SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism.
a Populations are arranged in ascending order of the frequency of the T alleles in Alzheimer’s cases.
b Genotype distributions of AD cases, with distributions of controls in parentheses.
c The distribution of the MTHFR 677T allele does not differ between Alzheimer’s cases and controls (P > 0.05).
d The distribution of the MTHFR 677T allele is significantly different between Alzheimer’s cases and controls (P < 0.05).