Research Article

Pilot Study on MAGE-C2 as a Potential Biomarker for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Table 1

Associations between MAGE-C2 expression status and clinicopathologic parameters.

VariableMAGE-C2 value
Low expression, (%)High expression, (%)

Total68 (61.81)42 (38.18)
Median age, years (range)47 (22–79)46 (27–67)0.391
Age, (%) 0.338
 ≤3514 (20.59)12 (28.57)
 >3554 (79.41)30 (71.43)
Tumor size, (%) 0.292
 ≤2 cm19 (27.94)8 (19.05)
 >2 cm49 (72.06)34 (80.95)
Lymph node status, (%) <0.001
 Negative48 (70.59)9 (21.43)
 Positive20 (29.41)33 (78.57)
TNM stage, (%) <0.001
 I/II63 (92.65)14 (33.33)
 III5 (7.35)28 (66.67)
Differentiation, (%) 0.792
 Well7 (10.29)6 (14.29)
 Moderate/poor61 (89.71)36 (85.71)
Lymphovascular invasion, (%) <0.001
 Yes4 (5.88)21 (50.00)
 No64 (94.12)21 (50.00)

TNM (tumor node metastasis) staging was conducted on all breast cancer patients postoperatively in accordance with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC, 7th edition). The Miller and Payne grading system was used for determining differentiation of the neoplasms.