Clinical Significance and Prognostic Value of the Expression of LAMP3 in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors in OSCC for 5-year survival.

Variable	Univariate analysis			Multivariate analysis
	HR	value	95% CI	HR	value	95% CI
LAMP3 expression	1.722	0.013	1.119–2.648	1.546	0.048	1.003–2.383
High versus low
Gender	1.040	0.847	0.696–1.556
Female versus male
Age (years)	1.259	0.273	0.834–1.898
<60 versus ≥60
Tobacco consumption	0.847	0.420	0.565–1.268
Yes versus no
Alcohol consumption	0.889	0.569	0.592–1.334
Yes versus no
Tumor location	0.983	0.934	0.655–1.474
Buccal versus tongue
Differentiation	1.715	0.018	1.097–2.682	1.707	0.020	1.089–2.674
Well versus moderate versus poor
T stage	1.257	0.056	0.994–1.589
Tis-1 versus T2 versus T3-4
Node metastasis	3.009	<0.001	1.976–4.582
No versus yes
TNM stage	1.562	0.001	1.213–2.011	1.566	0.001	1.213–2.022
Stages 0-I versus stages II-III versus stage IV

.