Research Article

SP110 Polymorphisms Are Genetic Markers for Vulnerability to Latent and Active Tuberculosis Infection in Taiwan

Table 4

Association analyses of SP110 SNP genotypes with LTBI and TB susceptibility in various inheritance models.
(a) Association analyses of SP110 SNP genotypes in an additive model

SNP IDTB vs. healthTB vs. LTBILTBI vs. health
OR (95% CI) valueOR (95% CI) valueOR (95% CI) value

rs90610.89 (0.66,1.2)0.43822.17 (1.16,4.06)0.0150.41 (0.22,0.78)0.0059
rs75809001.07 (0.83,1.38)0.58390.64 (0.43,0.95)0.02611.62 (1.1,2.39)0.0147
rs38209740.94 (0.72,1.23)0.66611.2 (0.79,1.82)0.40090.79 (0.51,1.21)0.2761
rs413091080.9 (0.66,1.22)0.49171.2 (0.73,1.97)0.48240.73 (0.44,1.23)0.2366
rs75809121.05 (0.8,1.37)0.73070.74 (0.49,1.1)0.13871.4 (0.94,2.08)0.0992
rs11357911.2 (0.83,1.73)0.32421.46 (0.77,2.77)0.24440.81 (0.42,1.56)0.525
rs13657761.1 (0.75,1.62)0.61531.32 (0.7,2.5)0.39330.84 (0.43,1.65)0.6133
rs104982441.1 (0.77,1.59)0.59191.4 (0.71,2.73)0.33030.77 (0.4,1.5)0.4457
rs22415250.91 (0.66,1.25)0.56810.62 (0.4,0.98)0.04071.46 (0.92,2.32)0.1102
rs115568870.72 (0.48,1.08)0.11550.75 (0.41,1.39)0.3620.96 (0.5,1.81)0.8916

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; ORs are adjusted for gender. The significant ORs are shown in italic.
(b) Association analyses of SP110 SNP genotypes in a dominant model

SNP IDTB vs. healthTB vs. LTBILTBI vs. health
OR (95% CI) valueOR (95% CI) valueOR (95% CI) value

rs90610.87 (0.6,1.26)0.46462.14 (1.09,4.22)0.02730.42 (0.21,0.82)0.0112
rs75809001.22 (0.84,1.76)0.29290.68 (0.37,1.27)0.22761.74 (0.93,3.24)0.083
rs38209740.93 (0.65,1.32)0.68791.3 (0.76,2.24)0.33780.71 (0.41,1.23)0.2193
rs413091080.86 (0.6,1.23)0.40921.15 (0.66,2.01)0.61910.74 (0.42,1.3)0.2917
rs75809121.18 (0.83,1.68)0.35710.98 (0.55,1.72)0.93121.2 (0.68,2.12)0.5388
rs11357911.2 (0.81,1.78)0.36781.41 (0.72,2.75)0.31460.83 (0.42,1.64)0.5948
rs13657761.03 (0.66,1.6)0.90331.34 (0.64,2.82)0.44080.79 (0.37,1.67)0.5353
rs104982441.15 (0.77,1.72)0.48071.75 (0.81,3.78)0.15360.63 (0.29,1.35)0.2341
rs22415250.87 (0.59,1.27)0.46670.55 (0.31,0.97)0.03891.57 (0.88,2.78)0.1239
rs115568870.66 (0.43,1.02)0.06090.67 (0.35,1.3)0.23630.97 (0.51,1.86)0.9282

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; ORs are adjusted for gender. The significant ORs are shown in italic.
(c) Association analyses of SP110 SNP genotypes in a recessive model

SNP IDTB vs. healthTB vs. LTBILTBI vs. health
OR (95% CI) valueOR (95% CI) valueOR (95% CI) value

rs90610.82 (0.38,1.78)0.6227
rs75809000.92 (0.57,1.48)0.7370.45 (0.24,0.84)0.01172.13 (1.13,4.03)0.0195
rs38209740.92 (0.52,1.62)0.77961.13 (0.45,2.83)0.80180.84 (0.33,2.15)0.7209
rs413091081.05 (0.41,2.66)0.92412.35 (0.3,18.52)0.41860.43 (0.05,3.55)0.437
rs75809120.79 (0.44,1.42)0.43670.35 (0.17,0.72)0.00432.49 (1.2,5.18)0.0142
rs11357911.63 (0.36,7.51)0.5284
rs13657762.25 (0.63,8.05)0.21291.94 (0.23,16.11)0.53751.24 (0.13,11.51)0.8504
rs104982440.74 (0.18,3.05)0.68040.38 (0.06,2.23)0.28442.27 (0.42,12.19)0.3385
rs22415251.05 (0.42,2.6)0.91720.56 (0.17,1.83)0.33741.73 (0.52,5.81)0.3747
rs115568872.63 (0.27,25.7)0.4064

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; ORs are adjusted for gender. The significant ORs are shown in italic. ORs remain significant after false discovery rate (FDR) correction.