Review Article

The Association of Digit Ratio (2D : 4D) with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Characteristics of the included studies.

Authors/countryCountrySample size (s)Major findings

Prostate cancer
(1)Mendes et al., 2016 [20]Brazil100 prostate cancer patients and 100 healthy individualsRight and left 2D : 4D were lower in prostate cancer patients relative to controls
Dr-l was not different between groups
2D : 4D did not correlate with Gleason score
(2)Stolten et al., 2016 [26]USA452 prostate cancer patients2D : 4D was not related to Gleason score, family history, or metastatic status
(3)Garcia-Cruz et al., 2012 [24]Spain204 patients undergoing prostate biopsy2D : 4D > 0.95 was related to neoplasia (OR = 4.4)
(4)Waters et al., 2013 [25]USA238 prostate cancer patientsAfrican-American men with prostate cancer were 3.70 times more likely to have low 2D : 4D than Caucasian men with prostate cancer
2D : 4D was not related to presence of metastasis, Gleason score, family history, or age at diagnosis
(5)Oh et al., 2012 [21]Korea770 consecutive men aged 40 years or older that presented with lower urinary tract symptomsRight 2D : 4D < 0.95 was associated with higher cancer detection rate and greater core cancer volume and higher Gleason score
(6)Muller et al., 2011 [19]Australia6258 men from community sample2D : 4D was not associated with prostate cancer risk in all participants
There was a weak inverse association between 2D : 4D and risk of prostate cancer for age < 60
(7)Rahman et al., 2011 [18]UK1524 prostate cancer cases and 3044 population-based controlsHigh right 2D : 4D was associated with lower prostate cancer risk
(8)Jung et al., 2011 [22]Korea366 > 40 years old men with a PSA level ≤ 40 ng/ml presenting for lower urinary tract symptomsPatients with 2D : 4D < 0.95 were more likely to have prostate cancer on biopsy
(9)Salomao et al., 2014 [23]Brazil474 men > 40 years old: with prostate cancer (); high risk for prostate cancer (); and low risk for prostate cancer ()2D : 4D was not different between the three groups

Breast cancer
(10)Hong et al., 2014 [27]China109 breast cancer patients and 109 controlsRight and left 2D : 4D was higher in patients than controls
Right and left 2D : 4D (but not Dr-l) correlated negatively with age at disease presentation
(11)Muller et al., 2012 [28]Australia9044 women from community sampleLeft 2D : 4D was positively and Dr-l was inversely associated with breast cancer risk
Right 2D : 4D was not related to breast cancer risk
Right 2D : 4D and Dr-l were inversely associated with age at breast cancer diagnosis

Testicular cancer
(12)Trabert et al., 2013 [29]AUSA246 testicular germ cell tumor patients and 236 controlsRight and left 2D : 4D and Dr-l were not associated with testicular germ cell tumor risk
(13)Auger and Eustache, 2010 [30]AFrance71 testicular cancer patients and 122 controls2D : 4D and Dr-l were not different between the two groups

Gastric cancer
(14)Sheng et al., 2016 [32]AChina94 male patients with gastric cancer and 91 controlsRight and left 2D : 4Ds were lower in gastric cancer patients than controls
2D : 4D ratio was not associated with tumor size, lymph node involvement or distant metastases, and age of onset
(15)Hopp et al., 2013 [31]ABrazil57 patients with gastric cancer and 59 controlsLeft 2D : 4D was higher and Dr-l was lower in patients relative to controls
2D : 4D did not correlate with cancer staging, tumor size, regional lymph node involvement, or distant metastases
Low Dr-l was associated with adenocarcinomas

Oral cancer
(16)Hopp and Jorge, 2011 [17]Brazil25 oral squamous cell carcinoma patients, 25 individuals with oral premalignant lesions, and 25 controls2D : 4D was higher in males with oral squamous cell carcinoma than in males with oral premalignant lesions and controls

Brain tumor
(17)Bunevicius et al., 2016 [33]Lithuania85 primary brain tumor (glioma, meningioma, and pituitary adenoma) patients and 106 controlsRight and left 2D : 4D were lower in brain tumor patients relative to controls
In meningioma and glioma patients, age at presentation correlated negatively with left 2D : 4D and positively with Dr-l

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
(18)Brabin et al., 2008 [34]United KingdomHuman papillomavirus (HPV) negative, normal smear (); HPV-positive, normal smear (); cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 (); CIN 2/3 ()2D : 4D ratio was similar for HPV-positive and HPV-negative women with normal smear
Women with any degree of cervical dysplasia were significantly more likely to have a higher 2D : 4D when compared with HPV-negative women
There was nonsignificant trend for the association of higher 2D : 4D ratio with persistent HPV infection

ACase-control studies included in the meta-analysis.