Disease Markers

Disease Markers / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 7636757 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7636757

Yang Cheng, Lanlan Geng, Kunyuan Wang, Jingjing Sun, Wanfu Xu, Sitang Gong, Yun Zhu, "Long Noncoding RNA Expression Signatures of Colon Cancer Based on the ceRNA Network and Their Prognostic Value", Disease Markers, vol. 2019, Article ID 7636757, 13 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7636757

Long Noncoding RNA Expression Signatures of Colon Cancer Based on the ceRNA Network and Their Prognostic Value

Academic Editor: Marco Tomasetti
Received11 Oct 2018
Revised18 Dec 2018
Accepted10 Jan 2019
Published11 Mar 2019


Background. The specific functional roles of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) as ceRNAs in colon cancer and their potential implications for colon cancer prognosis remain unclear. In the present study, a genome-wide analysis was performed to investigate the potential lncRNA-mediated ceRNA interplay in colon cancer based on the “ceRNA hypothesis.” The prognostic value of the lncRNAs was evaluated. Methods. A dysregulated lncRNA-associated ceRNA network was constructed based on the miRNA, lncRNA, and mRNA expression profiles in combination with the miRNA regulatory network by using an integrative computational method. Molecular biological techniques, including qPCR and gene knockdown techniques, were used to verify candidate targets in colon cancer. Survival analysis was performed to identify the candidate lncRNAs with prognostic value. Results. Our network analysis uncovered several novel lncRNAs as functional ceRNAs through crosstalk with miRNAs. The QRT-PCR assays of patient tissues as well as gene knockdown colon cancer cells confirmed the expression of top lncRNAs and their correlation with target genes in the ceRNA network. Functional enrichment analysis predicted that differentially expressed lncRNAs might participate in broad biological functions associated with tumor progression. Moreover, these lncRNAs may be involved in a range of cellular pathways, including the apoptosis, PI3K-AKT, and EGFR signaling pathways. The survival analysis showed that the expression level of several lncRNAs in the network was correlated with the prognosis of patients with colon cancer. Conclusions. This study uncovered a dysregulated lncRNA-associated ceRNA network in colon cancer. The function of the identified lncRNAs in colon cancer was preliminarily explored, and their potential prognostic value was evaluated. Our study demonstrated that lncRNAs could potentially serve as important regulators in the development and progression of colon cancer. Candidate prognostic lncRNA biomarkers in colon cancer were identified.

1. Introduction

Colon cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. In developing countries, approximately one-quarter of the patients suffering from colon cancer are in an advanced stage at presentation and have lost the opportunity for radical surgery [1, 2]. It is important to search for prognostic biomarkers and new therapies for human colon cancer.

Noncoding RNAs (NcRNAs) have appealed to researchers due to the modulating effect on the biological behaviors of tumor cells [3, 4]. Among these NcRNAs, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a main focus of attention. Increasing evidence has revealed that lncRNAs possess significant regulatory effects on carcinogenesis and tumor development [58].

The competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) hypothesis was first proposed by Salmena and colleagues, who suggested that protein-coding RNAs and NcRNAs act as ceRNAs by competing for miRNAs through shared miRNA response elements to mutually regulate their expression [9]. ceRNA has received wide attention as a novel approach to regulating genes. Given the prominent functions of ceRNAs in physiology, their deregulation is a common occurrence in cancer that can promote progression [1012]. lncRNAs can act as ceRNAs to sponge miRNAs and prevent these miRNAs from binding to mRNAs, thus regulating target genes posttranscriptionally [13]. Systematic analysis focused on lncRNA-associated ceRNA networks has been performed in a variety of cancers [1419]. However, the complexity and behavior of the lncRNA-associated ceRNA network remain poorly understood in the progression of colon cancer.

Here, we used an integrative computational method to identify lncRNA-mRNA-related crosstalk networks mediated by miRNAs based on the “ceRNA hypothesis” using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Candidate prognostic lncRNA biomarkers in colon cancer were identified. The expression of candidate lncRNAs and target genes was also confirmed in clinical colon cancer tissues and colon cancer cell lines.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Collection

Data from patients with colon cancer were downloaded from TCGA data portal website (available at https://cancergenome.nih.gov/) [20, 21]. Data on 439 tumorous tissues and 42 nontumorous adjacent tissues from 439 colon cancer patients with clinical follow-up information were included. The detailed characteristics of the included patients are shown in Doc S1. The mRNA and lncRNA expression profile data were derived from the TCGA COAD RNA-sequencing dataset. The miRNA expression profile data was derived from the TCGA COAD miRNA-sequencing dataset.

The human miRNA and targeted gene data were collected from miRTarBase (version 6.1) [22]. The data on human miRNA targeting lncRNA were collected from LncBase (version 2) [23].

2.2. Identification of Differentially Expressed lncRNAs, mRNAs, and miRNAs

The differentially expressed mRNAs, lncRNAs, and miRNAs in normal colon tissues and colon cancer tissues in the TCGA were analyzed using edgeR software packages. The false discovery rate (FDR) was controlled at the 0.01 threshold (Benjamini and Hochberg algorithm). The fold-change (FC) threshold was set at more than 2.0.

2.3. miRNA Target Prediction

miRTarbase is an information resource for experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions that provides the expression profile of a miRNA and its target gene. For the differentially expressed genes in TCGA, high-quality experimentally validated miRNA-target gene interaction relationships from published low-throughput experiments were selected. A total of 1523 pairs of miRNA-gene interactions containing 345 miRNAs and 531 genes were selected.

LncBase provides experimentally supported and in silico predicted interactions of miRNA and lncRNAs. For the differentially expressed lncRNAs, target miRNA-lncRNA in LncBase with a were selected. A total of 1025 pairs of miRNA-lncRNA interactions containing 492 miRNAs and 132 lncRNAs were selected.

2.4. Construction of lncRNA-Associated ceRNA Network

The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) for miRNA-mRNA and miRNA-lncRNA was calculated using paired miRNA, mRNA, and lncRNA expression profile data. A candidate pair of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA was constructed based on the “ceRNA hypothesis” as follows: (i) mRNAs and lncRNAs share the same miRNAs; (ii) mRNAs and lncRNAs suggest a positive correlation when the PCC is higher than 0.3 and value < 0.05; (iii) mRNAs and lncRNAs show a negative regulation with miRNA with and value < 0.05; and (iv) the miRNAs are aberrantly expressed in colon cancer.

All of the functional pairs were integrated to form a miRNA-mediated, lncRNA-associated ceRNA network. The degree values represent the number of genes with which the lncRNA can interact. The higher the degree is, the more centrally the lncRNA occurs within the network.

2.5. Gene Ontology Analysis

The Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was used to determine the potential roles of aberrantly expressed lncRNAs in colon cancer. GO enrichment was performed using BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin (http://cbl-gorilla.cs.technion.ac.il) [24].

2.6. KEGG Pathway Analyses

The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis (https://www.kegg.jp/) was performed to gain insight into the underlying biology of the ceRNA network as well as the top five lncRNAs with the highest degree in the ceRNA network. A clusterProfiler R package was used for the enrichment analysis [25].

2.7. Survival Analysis

A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed for patients with different lncRNA expressions. Statistical significance was assessed using the log-rank test. Patients were assigned to high-/low-expression groups according to the median of the expression level of lncRNAs. A flowchart of the ceRNA network construction and analysis is shown in Figure S1.

2.8. Patient Tissue Sample Preparation

Tissue samples of colon cancer were obtained from surgical specimens at Nanfang Hospital. The specimens were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen after excision. Thirty-five samples of colon cancer tissues and paired adjacent normal colon tissues were used for the lncRNA microarray analysis. The experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital.

2.9. Cell Culture and Transient Transfection

Human colon cancer cell lines HT-29 and HCT116 were obtained from Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The cells were cultured using conventional methods. For transient transfection of siRNA, the cells were seeded in 6-well plates and transfected with siRNA using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The target sequences for siRNAs are shown in Table S1.

2.10. Quantitation of the lncRNAs and Target Genes

Total RNA was extracted from the frozen tissues of patients or treated cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Purified total RNA was reverse transcribed using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara, Japan). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) of the top 5 lncRNAs was performed using the Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (lnRcute lncRNA qPCR detection kit) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The specific lncRNA primers are listed in Table S2. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR of the target genes was performed by specific gene primers using Thermal Cycler Dice Real Time (Takara Bio Inc.) according to the protocol. The specific gene primers are listed in Table S3. The expression levels of mRNA were normalized to the internal control GAPDH and then calculated with the ΔCT method. All data were expressed as the error of the measurement from at least three experiments.

2.11. Quantitation of miRNA Expression

Total RNA from cultured cell lines was isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Reverse transcriptase reactions were performed using Taqman Reverse Transcription Reagents (P/N: N808-0234, Applied Biosystems). Each reaction sample contains total RNA, 50 nM stem-loop RT primer, 1x RT buffer, 0.25 mM dNTPs, 3.33 U/μl MultiScribe reverse transcriptase, and 0.25 U/μl RNase inhibitor. Reactions were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Real-time PCR was performed using a standard TaqMan PCR kit protocol. The 10 μl PCR included 0.67 μl RT product, 1x TaqMan Fast Advanced Master Mix (P/N: 4444557, Applied Biosystems), 0.2 μM TaqMan probe, 1.5 μM forward primer, and 0.7 μM reverse primer. The reactions were incubated according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The specific miRNA primers are listed in Table S4. All reactions were run in triplicate. The data were normalized to the geometric mean of housekeeping snRNA U6 and calculated as 2−ΔΔCT.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Differentially Expressed lncRNAs, miRNAs, and mRNAs

A total of 439 tumorous tissues and 42 nontumorous adjacent tissues were included. A total of 16266 genes, 2758 lncRNAs, and 298 miRNAs were included in our study. In total, 115 miRNAs, 4188 mRNAs, and 663 lncRNAs were identified as differentially expressed between tumor tissues and normal tissues. Of the significantly differentially expressed lncRNAs, 441 were upregulated, and 222 were downregulated. Of the aberrantly expressed mRNAs, 2174 were upregulated, and 2014 were downregulated. In the significantly differentially expressed miRNAs, 71 were upregulated, and 44 were downregulated.

3.2. Global Properties of Colon Cancer-Specific ceRNA Network

An experimental interaction network among miRNAs, mRNAs, and lncRNAs was constructed. Positively and negatively correlated mRNA/miRNA pairs are both interesting from a purely statistical framework [26]. However, a high positive correlation between RNAs competing for miRNA binding has been recently experimentally observed and discussed [13]. Thus, we focused on the mRNA/lncRNA pairs that negatively correlated with the shared miRNA.

A lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA network containing 181 ceRNA crosstalk candidates was identified comprising 97 mRNAs, 31 lncRNAs, and 34 miRNAs (Doc S2). The constructed ceRNA network contained 128 nodes and 181 edges (Figure 1). A network analysis of the architecture and features of the colon cancer-specific network was performed (Table S5). The degree of nodes in the ceRNA network was calculated (Figure 2(a)). Most of the nodes had a low degree, and a small portion of nodes had a high degree. The degrees for the 31 lncRNAs are shown in Figure 2(b). The corresponding competing genes of the lncRNAs are listed in Table 1. We found that a variety of tumor progression-related genes were involved, such as apoptosis-related genes (FAS, BCL2, and BCL2L11) and a gene associated with DNA repair (BRCA1).

lncRNADegreeGene 1Gene 2Gene 3Gene 4Gene 5Gene 6Gene 7Gene 8Gene 9Gene 10Gene 11Gene 12Gene 13Gene 14Gene 15Gene 16Gene 17Gene 18

RP11-588 K22.22SNCGCAV1

Notably, lncRNA TRG-AS1 and RP11-399O19.9 in the network were significantly downregulated in the tumor tissues compared with normal colon tissues, and expression of the two lncRNAs was markedly lower in late-stage patients (stages III and IV) than in early-stage patients (stages I and II). Some other lncRNAs (UCA1, RP11-458F8.4, RP1-239B22.5, and ALMS1-IT1) that were upregulated in cancers showed a higher expression in the late stage than in the early stage (Table 2). These results suggest that the expression of these lncRNAs may be involved in the progression of colon cancer.

lncRNATumor vs. normalStages III and IV vs. stages I and II
lncRNA_IDlncRNAlogFC valueFDRlogFC valueFDR


3.3. Validation of the lncRNA and Target Gene Expression Using qPCR

To verify the reliability of the aberrant lncRNAs found in the TCGA database, a qPCR assay was used to detect the expression levels of the top five lncRNAs with the highest degree in 35 paired tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues from patients with colon cancer. The results indicate that the RP11-2C24.4 levels increased while the RP11-284N8.3, RP11-399O19.9, LINC00641, and MAGI2-AS3 levels decreased in the tumor tissues (Figure 3(a)). The results were consistent with the expression trends of the data identified in the ceRNA network.

The expression of the involved miRNAs, which were predicted to be “sponged” by the top five lncRNAs in the cell lines, was verified. We showed that all of the miRNAs are expressed in HT-29 and HCT116 cells (Figure S2). Then, we observed whether these lncRNAs and targeted gene expression levels are associated in the colon cancer cell lines HT-29 and HCT116. Small interfering RNAs (siRNA) against the top five lncRNAs were transfected into HT-29 and HCT116 cells. The QRT-PCR analysis revealed that transfection of siRNA reduced the main target genes as revealed by our ceRNA network (Figure 3(b)). For example, our ceRNA network showed that PIK3CG, SEMA6A, and IGF1 are the top three genes that interact with lncRNA RP11-284N8.3 Furthermore, siRNA silencing of RP11-284N8.3 in cancer cells led to decreases in PIK3CG, SEMA6A, and IGF1 mRNA (Figure 3(b)).

3.4. Functional Characterization and Pathway Analysis of Colon Cancer-Specific ceRNA Network

To characterize the function of our ceRNA network, a GO enrichment analysis and KEGG pathway analysis were performed (Doc S3 and S4). The top twenty GO functions and KEGG pathways are shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b). The GO enrichment analysis demonstrated that the ceRNA network is mainly involved in processes such as the regulation of protein serine/threonine kinase activity, response to oxygen levels, the regulation of cell motility, epithelial cell proliferation, and regulation of the cell cycle. The functional pathway analysis revealed that multiple signaling pathways in cancer were enriched in the ceRNA network, including the PI3K-AKT, Rap1, and p53 signaling pathways. The results suggest that the ceRNA network potentially modulated a variety of functions and regulated multiple signaling pathways during colon cancer development.

3.5. Mechanism of the Dysregulated lncRNAs in the Colon Cancer-Specific ceRNA Network

To preliminarily explore the potential functions of the dysregulated lncRNAs in colon cancer, a functional enrichment analysis for the target genes of the top 5 lncRNAs with the highest degree was performed based on GO terms. We showed that the mRNA targets for lncRNA RP11-399O19.9 included a variety of tumor-associated genes, such as the apoptosis-related genes FAS, BCL2, and BCL2L11 (Figure 5(a)). The gene function of lncRNA RP11-399O19.9 was significantly enriched in the GO terms mainly involved in cell death and apoptosis, cell cycle, morphogenesis, and response to stimuli (Figure S3). Similar results were found in the GO analysis for lncRNA RP11-284N8.3 (Table 3).

GO IDGO function valueFDR

60526Prostate glandular acinus morphogenesis
60527Prostate epithelial cord arborization involved in prostate glandular acinus morphogenesis
23033Signaling pathway
48608Reproductive structure development
8584Male gonad development
60736Prostate gland growth
35468Positive regulation of signaling pathway
60442Branching involved in prostate gland morphogenesis
60525Prostate glandular acinus development
10647Positive regulation of cell communication7
46546Development of primary male sexual characteristics
10740Positive regulation of intracellular protein kinase cascade
46661Male sex differentiation
30879Mammary gland development
48522Positive regulation of cellular process
42592Homeostatic process
10907Positive regulation of glucose metabolism
9967Positive regulation of signal transduction
10676Positive regulation of cellular carbohydrate metabolism
45913Positive regulation of carbohydrate metabolism
23056Positive regulation of signaling process
48878Chemical homeostasis
8633Activation of proapoptotic gene products
42981Regulation of apoptosis
43067Regulation of programmed cell death
2690Positive regulation of leukocyte chemotaxis
42531Positive regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT protein
10941Regulation of cell death
3006Reproductive developmental process
35295Tube development
60740Prostate gland epithelium morphogenesis
48518Positive regulation of biological processes
32787Monocarboxylic acid metabolism
60512Prostate gland morphogenesis
8406Gonad development
30335Positive regulation of cell migration

Mechanisms of the dysregulated lncRNAs in colon cancer were further explored using KEGG pathway analysis. The pathway analysis revealed that these lncRNAs participated in several cancer-related signaling pathways including apoptosis, the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, and the EGFR signaling pathway (Figure 5(b)). Notably, the main enriched signaling pathways regarding lncRNA RP11-399O19.9 contain colon cancer and platinum drug resistance (Figure 5(c)). These results suggest that lncRNAs in the ceRNA network participated in broad biological functions associated with colon cancer.

3.6. Progression-Related Network Analysis Reveals Prognostic lncRNA Biomarkers Associated with Colon Cancer

We further evaluated the prognostic value of the identified lncRNAs in colon cancer. We found that, compared with lower expression, higher expression of ALMS1-IT1 and RP13-942N8.1 was significantly correlated with poor prognosis of colon cancer (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). Moreover, low expression of several other lncRNAs including MALAT1, RP11-6O2.3, RP11-2C24.4, LINC00294, GAS5, and PWAR6 correlated with a better prognosis for colon cancer; however, the results are not statistically significant (Figures 6(c)6(h)). In addition, the expression pattern of the six lncRNAs in the patients is in accordance with the results of the survival analysis, which show higher expression levels in colon cancer tissues than in adjacent normal tissues. These data suggested that these dysregulated lncRNAs might be potential prognostic biomarkers for colon cancer.

4. Discussion

The ceRNA hypothesis represents a novel posttranscriptional regulatory dimension of gene regulation [27]. However, interactions between lncRNAs and mRNAs have never been reported in colon cancer. There is also a lack of research investigating changes in the expression of regulatory lncRNAs. To elucidate the important roles of lncRNAs and explore the regulatory networks in colon cancer, a genome-wide analysis of lncRNAs, miRNAs, and mRNAs from the TCGA database was performed. Based on the ceRNA hypothesis, we constructed a lncRNA-associated ceRNA network in colon cancer. Most studies for identifying miRNA sponge interactions use putative miRNA target information and hypergeometric tests to identify candidate miRNA sponges [26, 2830], whereas our study used experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions. Compared with the methods used in former studies, the method in our study is stricter. Furthermore, molecular biological techniques were performed to verify the expression of candidate lncRNA target genes in colon cancer.

Functional studies show that ceRNA appears to participate in several cancer-related processes such as cell proliferation, cell cycle, and cell invasion. The pathway analysis suggested that the ceRNA network is potentially involved in multiple signaling pathways, such as the PI3K-AKT, Rap1, Ras, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance signaling pathways.

Studies have revealed a critical role of lncRNA dysregulation in modulating gene expression as well as tumor development and progression. A recent study reported that lncRNA H19 is a miRNA 200a sponge that inhibits miRNA 200a functions, thereby promoting cell proliferation in colorectal cancer [31]. The report revealed the potential functional significance of the lncRNA-associated ceRNA network in colon cancer. Our analysis revealed that lncRNAs participate in a complex ceRNA network in colon cancer. In total, 31 lncRNAs were found in the network. The QPCR assays of the top five lncRNAs in paired tumor and normal tissues verified the expression trends of the lncRNAs in the ceRNA network. The QRT-PCR analysis also revealed that transfection of siRNA of lncRNAs in the colon cancer cell lines reduced the main target genes revealed by our ceRNA network.

In the constructed ceRNA network, lncRNAs TRG-AS1 and RP11-399O19.9 were significantly downregulated in tumor tissues, and the expression was much lower in late-stage cancer than in early-stage cancer, suggesting that they may be protective factors in colon cancer. Meanwhile, lncRNAs UCA1, RP11-458F8.4, RP1-239B22.5, and ALMS1-IT1, which were markedly upregulated in tumor tissues, have higher expression levels in late-stage cancer. The results suggest that these lncRNAs may play crucial roles in colon cancer occurrence and progression.

From our literature review, we found that several lncRNAs among the ceRNA network, such as lncRNAs UCA1, GAS5, MALAT1, and PVT1, are associated with oncogenesis and the development of colon cancer [3235]. For example, lncRNA UCA1 influences cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle distribution, leading to chemoresistance of 5-Fu via competing miRNA-204 functions. lncRNA GAS5 contributes to lymphatic metastasis and was significantly associated with the susceptibility and progression of colon cancer [36]. lncRNA MALAT1 was upregulated in colon cancer tissues and may mediate HMGB1 by sponging miR-129-5p in colon cancer. High expression of lncRNA MALAT1 suggests poor prognosis in colon cancer [35, 37]. lncRNA PVT1 functions as an oncogene in human colon cancer, which could promote the metastasis and proliferation of colon cancer by suppressing miR-30d-5p [38]. In addition, PVT1 overexpression in colon cancer cells significantly promoted cisplatin resistance in vivo [39]. All of these studies support our results and confirmed the role of lncRNAs among the ceRNA network during the development of colon cancer.

However, the functions of most lncRNAs enrolled in the network have not been determined. Computational methods for predicting the function of lncRNA have shown many advantages to functional annotation [40, 41]. An endogenous competing mRNA target was used to predict the functions of lncRNAs. We showed that these mRNA targets for lncRNAs in the ceRNA network included a variety of tumor-associated genes, such as the apoptosis-related genes FAS, BCL2, and BCL2L11 and the DNA repair gene BRCA1. The GO enrichment analysis indicated that these lncRNAs may be involved in a number of biological processes, including cell death and apoptosis, cell cycle, morphogenesis, and response to stimuli. The KEGG pathway analysis suggested that the inferred functions of the top lncRNAs were involved in the apoptosis signaling pathway, PI3K-AKT pathway, EGFR pathway, colon cancer pathway, and platinum drug resistance, which are fundamental processes for colon cancer development.

lncRNAs can be powerful predictors for the survival of cancer patients [4244]. However, few studies have been performed to predict colon cancer-specific lncRNAs as a biomarker for colon cancer prognosis. This study showed that several lncRNAs in the ceRNA network were correlated with survival prognosis in patients with colon cancer. For example, higher expression of lncRNAs ALMS1-IT1 and RP13-942N8.1 was significantly correlated with poorer survival prognosis in patients. Our discovery indicated that lncRNAs in the constructed ceRNA network might be used to predict the prognosis of colon cancer.

In conclusion, the present study represents a view of colon cancer from a concurrent analysis of lncRNAs, miRNAs, and mRNAs. The constructed colon cancer ceRNA network brings to light an unknown lncRNA regulatory network in colon cancer. Furthermore, analysis of the ceRNA network identified several lncRNAs that are possibly involved in the regulation mechanisms, progression, and prognosis of colon cancer. Future functional investigation of these lncRNAs is essential to confirm the association with colon cancer and to explore novel potential targets for therapy.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical Approval

All experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests to report.

Authors’ Contributions

Yang Cheng, Lanlan Geng, and Kunyuan Wang contributed equally to the work.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81602646), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (no. 2016A030310254), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (no. 2016M600648).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary 1. Table S1: target sequences for siRNAs for the top 5 lncRNAs in the colon cancer-specific ceRNA network. Table S2: primer sequence for the QRT-PCR analysis of the top five lncRNAs in the colon cancer-specific ceRNA network. Table S3: specific gene primers of the target genes of lncRNAs. Table S4: specific primers of the target miRNAs of lncRNAs. Table S5: network characteristics of a colon cancer-specific ceRNA network. Figure S1: a flowchart of ceRNA network construction and analysis in our study. Figure S2: verification of the expression of the target miRNAs in the ceRNA network. Figure S3: functional enrichment of lncRNA RP11-399O19.9 in the ceRNA network.

Supplementary 2. Doc S1: characteristics of the patients in the TCGA COAD database.

Supplementary 3. Doc S2: ceRNA crosstalk identified in the COAD database.

Supplementary 4. Doc S3: GO enrichment analysis of the ceRNA network.

Supplementary 5. Doc S4: KEGG pathway analysis of the ceRNA network.


  1. M. M. Center, A. Jemal, R. A. Smith, and E. Ward, “Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 366–378, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. Hanahan and R. A. Weinberg, “Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation,” Cell, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 646–674, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. Koirala, J. Huang, T. T. Ho, F. Wu, X. Ding, and Y. Y. Mo, “LncRNA AK023948 is a positive regulator of AKT,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, article 14422, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. H. Rasmussen, I. Lyskjær, R. R. Jersie-Christensen et al., “miR-625-3p regulates oxaliplatin resistance by targeting MAP2K6-p38 signalling in human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, article 12436, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. Chakravarty, A. Sboner, S. S. Nair et al., “The oestrogen receptor alpha-regulated lncRNA NEAT1 is a critical modulator of prostate cancer,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 5383, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. Patel, A. Morris, R. Patel, G. Carter, D. Cooper, and M. Murr, “PKCδVIII and Bcl2 increase ovarian cancer survival via lncRNA NEAT1 secreted by obese adipose derived stem cells,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 29, Supplement 1, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  7. H. Yu, Q. Xu, F. Liu, X. Ye, J. Wang, and X. Meng, “Identification and validation of long noncoding RNA biomarkers in human non-small-cell lung carcinomas,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 645–654, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. Zeng, Y. Xu, L. Xu et al., “Inhibition of long non-coding RNA NEAT1 impairs myeloid differentiation in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells,” BMC Cancer, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 693, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Salmena, L. Poliseno, Y. Tay, L. Kats, and P. P. Pandolfi, “A ceRNA hypothesis: the Rosetta Stone of a hidden RNA language?” Cell, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 353–358, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Cesana, D. Cacchiarelli, I. Legnini et al., “A long noncoding RNA controls muscle differentiation by functioning as a competing endogenous RNA,” Cell, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 358–369, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. F. A. Karreth and P. P. Pandolfi, “ceRNA cross-talk in cancer: when ce-bling rivalries go awry,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1113–1121, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. Taulli, C. Loretelli, and P. P. Pandolfi, “From pseudo-ceRNAs to circ-ceRNAs: a tale of cross-talk and competition,” Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 541–543, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. Poliseno, L. Salmena, J. Zhang, B. Carver, W. J. Haveman, and P. P. Pandolfi, “A coding-independent function of gene and pseudogene mRNAs regulates tumour biology,” Nature, vol. 465, no. 7301, pp. 1033–1038, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. Zhang, Y. Li, Q. Wang et al., “Identification of an lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA interaction mechanism in breast cancer based on bioinformatic analysis,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 5113–5120, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. Xia, Q. Liao, X. Jiang et al., “Long noncoding RNA associated-competing endogenous RNAs in gastric cancer,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 6088, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Kun, Q. Duan, G. Liu, and J. M. Lu, “Prognostic value of DNA repair genes based on stratification of glioblastomas,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 35, pp. 58222–58230, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Wang, Z. Fu, C. Dai et al., “LncRNAs expression profiling in normal ovary, benign ovarian cyst and malignant epithelial ovarian cancer,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 38983, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. E. Naderi, M. Mostafaei, A. Pourshams, and A. Mohamadkhani, “Network of microRNAs-mRNAs interactions in pancreatic cancer,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 534821, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Yang, Q. Ning, G. Zhang, H. Sun, Z. Wang, and Y. Li, “Construction of differential mRNA-lncRNA crosstalk networks based on ceRNA hypothesis uncover key roles of lncRNAs implicated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 52, pp. 85728–85740, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. Tomczak, P. Czerwinska, and M. Wiznerowicz, “The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): an immeasurable source of knowledge,” Współczesna Onkologia, vol. 1A, pp. 68–77, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, J. N. Weinstein, E. A. Collisson et al., “The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project,” Nature Genetics, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1113–1120, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. H. Chou, N. W. Chang, S. Shrestha et al., “miRTarBase 2016: updates to the experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions database,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 44, no. D1, pp. D239–D247, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. D. Paraskevopoulou, I. S. Vlachos, D. Karagkouni et al., “DIANA-LncBase v2: indexing microRNA targets on non-coding transcripts,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 44, no. D1, pp. D231–D238, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. K. Hazra, L. Sriramkumar, and J. Martin, “BINGO: a code for the efficient computation of the scalar bi-spectrum,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2013, no. 5, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. Yu, L. G. Wang, Y. Han, and Q. Y. He, “clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters,” OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 284–287, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. P. Paci, T. Colombo, and L. Farina, “Computational analysis identifies a sponge interaction network between long non-coding RNAs and messenger RNAs in human breast cancer,” BMC Systems Biology, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 83, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. Tay, J. Rinn, and P. P. Pandolfi, “The multilayered complexity of ceRNA crosstalk and competition,” Nature, vol. 505, no. 7483, pp. 344–352, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Xu, Y. Li, J. Lu et al., “The mRNA related ceRNA–ceRNA landscape and significance across 20 major cancer types,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 43, no. 17, pp. 8169–8182, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. Liu, W. Wang, and X. Zhou, “Construction and investigation of breast-cancer-specific ceRNA network based on the mRNA and miRNA expression data,” IET Systems Biology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 96–103, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. P. Sumazin, X. Yang, H. S. Chiu et al., “An extensive microRNA-mediated network of RNA-RNA interactions regulates established oncogenic pathways in glioblastoma,” Cell, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 370–381, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. W. Yang, N. Ning, and X. Jin, “The lncRNA H19 promotes cell proliferation by competitively binding to miR-200a and derepressing β-catenin expression in colorectal cancer,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2017, Article ID 2767484, 8 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. Han, Y. N. Yang, H. H. Yuan et al., “UCA1, a long non-coding RNA up-regulated in colorectal cancer influences cell proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle distribution,” Pathology, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 396–401, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Takahashi, G. Sawada, J. Kurashige et al., “Amplification of PVT-1 is involved in poor prognosis via apoptosis inhibition in colorectal cancers,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 164–171, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. D. Yin, X. He, E. Zhang, R. Kong, W. De, and Z. Zhang, “Long noncoding RNA GAS5 affects cell proliferation and predicts a poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer,” Medical Oncology, vol. 31, no. 11, p. 253, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. T. Zheng, D. B. Shi, Y. W. Wang et al., “High expression of lncRNA MALAT1 suggests a biomarker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 3174–3181, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  36. Y. Zheng, D. Song, K. Xiao et al., “LncRNA GAS5 contributes to lymphatic metastasis in colorectal cancer,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 50, pp. 83727–83734, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Q. Wu, W. Y. Meng, Y. Jie, and H. Zhao, “LncRNA MALAT1 induces colon cancer development by regulating miR-129-5p/HMGB1 axis,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 233, no. 9, pp. 6750–6757, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. X. Yu, J. Zhao, and Y. He, “Long non-coding RNA PVT1 functions as an oncogene in human colon cancer through miR-30d-5p/RUNX2 axis,” Journal of Balkan Union of Oncology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 48–54, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  39. G. Ping, W. Xiong, L. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zhao, “Silencing long noncoding RNA PVT1 inhibits tumorigenesis and cisplatin resistance of colorectal cancer,” American Journal of Translational Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 138–149, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  40. Q. Liao, C. Liu, X. Yuan et al., “Large-scale prediction of long non-coding RNA functions in a coding-non-coding gene co-expression network,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 3864–3878, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. Ma, Y. Hao, X. Dong et al., “Molecular mechanisms and function prediction of long noncoding RNA,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2012, Article ID 541786, 11 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. Q. Guo, Y. Cheng, T. Liang et al., “Comprehensive analysis of lncRNA-mRNA co-expression patterns identifies immune-associated lncRNA biomarkers in ovarian cancer malignant progression,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, article 17683, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. J. Qiu, Y. Y. Lin, L. C. Ye et al., “Overexpression of long non-coding RNA HOTAIR predicts poor patient prognosis and promotes tumor metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 121–128, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. F. Yang, L. Zhang, X. S. Huo et al., “Long noncoding RNA high expression in hepatocellular carcinoma facilitates tumor growth through enhancer of zeste homolog 2 in humans,” Hepatology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1679–1689, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Yang Cheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.