Disease Markers

Disease Markers / 2019 / Article
Special Issue

Novel Biomarkers of Renal Disease Progression

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 8705989 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8705989

Liang Xia, Yangjia Cao, Yang Guo, Guangyi Ba, Qiong Luo, Haibo Shi, Yanmei Feng, Shankai Yin, "A Novel Heterozygous Mutation of the COL4A3 Gene Causes a Peculiar Phenotype without Hematuria and Renal Function Impairment in a Chinese Family", Disease Markers, vol. 2019, Article ID 8705989, 8 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8705989

A Novel Heterozygous Mutation of the COL4A3 Gene Causes a Peculiar Phenotype without Hematuria and Renal Function Impairment in a Chinese Family

Academic Editor: Chia-Ter Chao
Received22 Nov 2018
Revised16 Jan 2019
Accepted17 Jan 2019
Published10 Feb 2019


Mutations in the COL4A3 gene are frequently reported to be associated with various types of hereditary nephropathy. COL4A3 encodes the α3 chain of type IV collagen, which is the main structural protein in the basement membrane. Mutations in this gene are always related to kidney performance, and deafness and ocular lesion have also been reported. In this study, using next-generation sequencing, we investigated the DNA of a family visiting a clinic for hearing loss. A new missense mutation was found in COL4A3 of 5 patients, c.3227C>T (p.P1076L). Based on these results, we predict that the mutation is pathogenic and leads to abnormal collagen IV. Here, we report for the first time on this autosomal dominant syndrome, characterized by hearing loss and eye abnormalities, but without renal damage, in all carriers. Since the oldest patient in the trial was less than 50 years old, however, we recommend that renal examination be reviewed regularly. Our results reveal expansion in the mutation spectrum of the COL4A3 gene and phenotypic spectrum of collagen IV disease. Our study suggests that next-generation sequencing is an economical and effective method and may help in the accurate diagnosis and treatment of these patients.

1. Introduction

Type IV collagen, the major structural component of basement membranes (BMs), is a multimeric protein composed of 3 α subunits. These subunits are encoded by 6 different genes, α 1 through α 6, each of which can form a triple helix structure with 2 other subunits to form type IV collagen [1]. Trimers composed of α3, α4, and α5 chains are restricted in expression to specific BMs of the kidney, inner ear, and eye [2]. The COL4A3 gene encodes α3 chains, and it is concluded that pathogenic COL4A3 mutations account for Alport syndrome (AS) [3]. Variants in the COL4A3 gene also cause diabetic kidney disease from maturity-onset diabetes in the young and those with familial benign hematuria (FBH) [4]. In addition, recent studies support that the COL4A3 gene is a newly discovered pathogenic gene related to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) [57]. Autosomal dominant Alport syndrome causes hematuria, proteinuria, or progressive kidney disease. It also can be accompanied by late-onset high-tone sensorineural hearing loss and/or ocular abnormalities [8]. Hearing loss is directly related to the progression of renal failure in Alport syndrome [9]. The characteristics of FBH are persistent or recurrent hematuria without proteinuria, renal failure, or extra renal symptoms [10]. FSGS is a kind of proteinuria and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) associated with glomerular tissue pathological changes [11].

Recently, we enrolled a Chinese family on the clinic with a new mutation in the COL4A3 gene. Profound hearing loss and retinitis pigmentosa (RP) were found in pathogenic gene carriers, but kidney impairment was not present. Mutations in the COL4A3 gene that often lead to more atypical phenotypes have received increasing attention, because clarifying the new pathogenesis can promote the development of new treatment methods and create new areas of research on hearing impairment. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to identify the genetic cause of deafness in this family.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

The program was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital. The present study recruited all 7 family members. In addition, 250 healthy donors were recruited as controls for a mutation analysis. All participants involved in the study were of Han ethnicity and provided written informed consent prior to the study’s commencement.

2.2. Phenotype Evaluation

The hearing levels of all participating members were measured by pure tone audiometry or auditory brainstem response. Ophthalmologic examination included fundus photography, a visual field test, and an electroretinogram. Through physical and radiological examination, pathological changes in the middle ear were excluded as were the presence of cochlear lesions and vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Additional auditory evaluations included otoscopic examination, an otoacoustic emissions test, and temporal bone high-resolution computed-tomography scanning. Examinations also included ophthalmologic exams, routine urine exam, urine protein quantitation, and blood biochemical analysis (retinal and liver function) of all family members.

2.3. Genetic Analysis

To make a precise diagnosis, we performed targeted NGS of related deafness genes. The collection of 5 mL peripheral blood samples taken from individuals was used for the following experiment. A capture panel (NimbleGen, Madison, USA) of deafness genes had been previously designed and assessed by our group. The capture panel included all exons together with the flanking exon and intron boundaries (±15 bp) of 180 genes. Genomic DNA of each subject was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The DNA was then fragmented by sonication using a Covaris LE220 (Woburn, Massachusetts, USA) to generate a paired-end library (200–250 bp). The library was enriched by array hybridization [12]. The magnitude of enrichment of the products was then evaluated with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Santa Clara, California, USA) and ABI StepOne™ real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). Then, captured library sequencing was carried out using a BGISEQ-500 analyzer (BGI, Shenzhen, China) following the manufacturer’s standard sequencing protocols to generate paired-end reads. Image processing and base calling were executed using Illumina Pipeline software (version 1.3.4) to generate raw data.

2.4. Mutational Analysis

We performed bioinformatics processing and analyzed the data after receiving the raw data. Previously published filtering criteria were used to generate “clean reads” for further analysis [12]. The “clean reads” (with a length of 90 bp) originated in targeted sequencing and filtering were then aligned to the human genome reference (hg19) using the BWA (Burrows-Wheeler Aligner) Multi-Vision software package [13]. We used SOAPsnp software [14] and SAMtools [15] to detect SNVs and indels, respectively. All SNVs and indels were filtered and estimated through cross-referencing against multiple databases, including NCBI dbSNP, HapMap, 1000 Genomes project, and a database containing DNA from 250 healthy Chinese adults. We used the following three different bioinformatics algorithms to predict the variants, including missense mutations and frame shift mutations: Polyphen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/), and Mutation Master (http://www.Mutationtaster.org/). Furthermore, amino acid conservation was analyzed using the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/).

2.5. Sanger Sequencing

Candidate gene mutations were validated using conventional Sanger sequencing methods. The primers were designed using the online Primer3 software. The PCR products were purified by shrimp alkaline enzyme (SAP) (from Promega) and exogenous enzyme I (EXO I) (from Epicentre) and sequenced using a BigDye® Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit, version 3.1 (Foster, CA, USA). An ABI 3730xl sequencer (Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to analyze the sequencing products. The sequencing documents were analyzed by PolyPhred software.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Phenotype

Figure 1 shows the audiograms of family members. The proband and his sister had bilateral hearing loss that began in their first decade and gradually developed to severe hearing loss in the second decade. The proband’s mother had mild hearing loss while his father was completely normal. No inner ear malformation of any subject was found by temporal bone high-resolution computed-tomography scanning. Ophthalmoscopy demonstrated retinal bone spicule pigmentary changes, retinal vessel attenuation, and diffuse macular atrophy in both eyes of the proband (Figure 2(a)). The proband and his sister also suffered from night vision disturbance and reduction of the visual field (Figure 2(b)). The proband and his sisters had an established clinical diagnosis of RP (Figure 2(c)). However, the proband’s mother was unaffected by RP, but she was nyctalopic. But son (III-1) of II-3, a 2-year-old male, had normal phenotypes in the ear, eye, and kidney. All family members received routine blood and urine tests (including urinary sediment quantification), which showed no hematuria, proteinuria, or impaired renal function. Clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1 for all members.


Hearing lossMildNormalProfoundProfoundProfoundProfoundNormal
Proteinuria (g/24 h)0.0950.0990.1000.1060.1200.0590.008
Creatinine (μmoI/L)54665867597327
Renal failureNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
Visual field lossNoNoYesYesYesYesNo
Pigmented retinopathyNoNoYesYesYesYesNo

M/F: male/female.
3.2. Identification of Pathogenic Mutations in COL4A3

Sequence analysis of DNA in this pedigree identified a novel heterozygous mutation: C to T in exon 38 of COL4A3 (NM_000091, c.3227C>T), which led to an amino acid substitution (p.Pro1076Leu) (Figure 3(a)). The missense mutation in COL4A3 was absent in the 250 healthy controls. The mutation was found in I-1, II-1, II-2, II-3, II-4, and III-1, consistent with an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance.

3.3. Bioinformatics Analysis of the COL4A3 Mutation

The variant sequence was highly conserved across different species (Figure 3(b)). To further evaluate the possible deleterious consequence of the novel COL4A3 missense mutation, three different in silico algorithms were used. SIFT analysis classified the variant as “intolerance” with a score of 0.01 (the threshold for intolerance is 0.05). The PolyPhen-2 software predicted the p.P1076L substitution to be probably damaging, with a score of 0.732. Additionally, the MutationTaster software supported the pathogenic effect of the variant, which was reported to be “disease-causing.” These results suggest that the novel variant would substantially alter the function of the resulting protein.

4. Discussion

In this study, we identified a novel mutation (c.3227C>T) in COL4A3. Mutations in COL4A3 always lead to kidney-related pathogenic phenotypes, but the family in the study presented recognized diagnostic challenges in kidney disease, including atypical clinical features. Increasing evidence has shown that identical variants in COL4A3 are benign, but related to autosomally recessive AS, FSGS, and FBH [1, 5, 10]. The transmission of AS can be autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, or X-linked, and the prognosis is poor. On the contrary, BFH showed a good autosomal dominant pattern of prognosis [16]. All COL4A3 mutations in previous research are summarized in Table 2. The age of onset is inconsistent. Most patients had the renal and extra renal phenotype, while others had only the renal phenotype. Rosado et al. found another COL4A3 heterozygous mutation, which, in a few of the carriers, was also associated with a lack of kidney disease, but there was mild deafness [9]. However, a particular COL4A3 mutation without renal damage in all carriers has not been reported. The proband and his sister in this study had severe hearing loss and eye abnormalities, but no renal impairments, such as hematuria and proteinuria, were found. In addition, the III-1, 2-year-old male, had no abnormality phenotype. We hoped that the ultrastructure of the glomerular basement membrane could be examined by renal biopsy, but this diagnostic test was refused.

ReferencesPopulationsAgeGenderMutation stateMutationHematuriaProteinuriaHearing lossOcular lesions

[16]UK47MHeterozygousc.3418+1G>T c.4664C>T;++++
[18]Sri Lankan14FHomozygousc.1219G>T; c.1223_1224delGG+++
[9]Spanish32FHeterozygousc.345 delG;++++
[19]Ashkenazi Jewish2FHomozygousc.40_63del+++
[19]SpanishUKFCompound heterozygotec.40_63del+++
[6]Caucasian8FCompound heterozygousdel393G_E131fsX151 2806C>T+++
[21]Chinese45MHeterozygousc. 2290G >A++
[24]African American14MCompound heterozygousc.4486C>T c.4546C>T+++
Current studyChinese16MHeterozygousc.3227C>T++
Current studyChinese47FHeterozygousc.3227C>T++
Current studyChinese2MHeterozygousc.3227C>T

UK: unknown; M/F: male/female; +/-: positive/negative.

Type IV collagen is usually an extracellular structural protein and constitutes a collagen branch network, which is an important component of BMs [1]. The type IV collagen molecule consists of three chains, each of which consists of three similar components: (1) a “7S” domain at the amino terminus, (2) a long collagen domain of about 1400 Gly-X-Y repeats interrupted by a short non-collagen region and forming a triple helix with the other two chains—the X and Y positions are usually proline and hydroxyproline but also can be any residue—and (3) a non-collagen “NC1” domain of about 230 residues at the carboxyl terminus, folded into a globular structure. COL4A3 is located on 2q36-37, encoding an α3 collagen chain of type IV collagen [5, 27]. Figure 3 shows a schematic diagram of the molecular structure of type IV collagen in the organ of Corti and amino acid mutation sites of the α3 chain of type IV collagen in our study.

Even if environmental factors and different lifestyles influence the characteristics of disease in different family members [21], protein structure affected by mutation is the most important. The mechanism by which the mutation affects the function of COL4A3 is not fully understood, yet the different clinical manifestations of the COL4A3 mutation can be explained in this way. By integrating the altered collagen chain into the final network, normal structure and function are disrupted [28].

The COL4A3 mutation in this family is located in the collagen domain. Proline can form an alpha helix structure in protein, destroying the α-helix, which will destroy the collagen skeleton. Type IV collagen α3, α4, and α5 chains are known to aggregate in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to form helical heterotrimers. Mutated COL4A3 chains retained in the ER are associated with activation of the UPR pathway, leading to cytotoxicity and apoptosis [29]. Synthesis of the same amount of normal and abnormal chains will lead to the 1 : 1 ratio between the abnormal and normal molecules. Abnormal collagen homopolymers may cause the molecular folding, secretion, and extracellular matrix formation [30]. Other similar studies have also mentioned that misfolded proteins can be secreted into BM or accumulate in podocytes, disrupting glomerular selective barrier properties and activating downstream pathological pathways [31, 32]. Zehnder et al. discovered that in human cochlea, the α3 chain is specifically expressed in collagen bundles in the basement membrane, spiral ligament, and spiral margin. These results suggest that hearing loss may be due to cochlear micromechanical changes or are consistent with the helical ligament dysfunction hypothesis [2]. Type IV collagen α3 chains are also found in the basement membranes of the conjunctiva, cornea, iris, lens capsule, and Descemet’s and Bruch’s membrane [33]. Therefore, mutation in the COL4A3 gene leads to structural and functional disorders of type 4 collagen in the affected basement membrane. Ultimately, it leads to abnormal ocular phenotypes.

The special phenotype of COL4A3 in this study may also be due to haploinsufficiency [34]. Studies have shown that the heterozygous COL4A3 mutation can lead to a decrease in expression [4]. A mutant gene in an allele causes the amount of protein encoded by a heterozygous mutant gene to fail to reach the threshold required for the normal functioning of the protein encoded by the two alleles thus causing the protein encoded by the heterozygous mutant gene to fail to perform its normal physiological function, which is functionally equivalent to a nonsense mutation [35]. If haploinsufficiency is a mechanism by which COL4A3 mutations affect gene expression regulation, the kidney can avoid the effect of partial loss of COL4A3 function, because COL4A3 may be expressed at a much higher level in the kidney than in the cochlea and eye [36, 37]. Thus, COL4A3 levels may be sufficient to maintain kidney function, which may not be the case in the cochlea and eyes that exhibit much lower levels of expression. Alternatively, the mutant COL4A3 protein may lose some of its functions, but not others, rather than just lowering the overall level of COL4A3 function. If the key function is related to the cochlea and the eye, but not to the kidney, the mutation can affect the cochlea and the eye, but not the kidney.

One of the important specificities of the heterozygous COL4A3 mutation reported here is that the renal phenotype was not found in I-1, II-1–II-4, and III-1. The wide phenotypic transformation with COL4A3 mutations and the presence of incomplete penetrance suggest that a simple Mendelian model is inadequate to explain the genetic mechanism of the disease [38].

5. Conclusion

In summary, the study expanded the phenotypic spectrum of COL4A3 mutation carriers. It is noteworthy that although we have found a heterozygous COL4A3 mutation (c.3227 C>T) that may cause extreme deafness and ocular abnormalities, we should continue to monitor possible delayed kidney disease. Further, the autosomal dominant pattern in this case suggests to us the importance of this mode to deafness and ocular abnormalities, though 70 to 85% of the mode of inheritance of neurosensory hearing impairment occurs in an autosomal recessive pattern. Moreover, the novel pathogenic mutation identified in this study will be important for carrier testing and premarital screening for this family and their relatives in the future.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no competing interest relevant to the publication of this paper.


This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81771015), the Three-year Action Program on Promotion of Clinical Skills/Clinical Innovation for Municipal Hospitals (No. 16CR4027A) and the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission/Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (No. 20152526) to Yanmei Feng.


  1. L. Heidet, C. Arrondel, L. Forestier et al., “Structure of the human type IV collagen gene COL4A3 and mutations in autosomal Alport syndrome,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 97–106, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. F. Zehnder, J. C. Adams, P. A. Santi et al., “Distribution of type IV collagen in the cochlea in Alport syndrome,” Archives of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, vol. 131, no. 11, pp. 1007–1013, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. H. Lemmink, T. MochlzukJ, L. P. W. J. van den Heuvel et al., “Mutations in the type IV collagen α3 (COL4A3) gene in autosomal recessive Alport syndrome,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1269–1273, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Y. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Zhao et al., “COL4A3 gene variants and diabetic kidney disease in MODY,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1162–1171, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. X. Jingyuan, W. Xiaoxi, R. Hong et al., “COL4A3 mutations cause focal segmental glomerulosclerosis,” Journal of Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 498–505, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. F. Malone, P. J. Phelan, G. Hall et al., “Rare hereditary COL4A3/COL4A4 variants may be mistaken for familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis,” Kidney International, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1253–1259, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. Voskarides, A. Pierides, and C. Deltas, “COL4A3/COL4A4 mutations link familial hematuria and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Glomerular epithelium destruction via basement membrane thinning?” Connective Tissue Research, vol. 49, no. 3-4, pp. 283–288, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. F. D. L. Van, L. Heidet, E. D. Timmer et al., “Autosomal dominant Alport syndrome caused by a COL4A3 splice site mutation,” Kidney International, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1870–1875, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Rosado, E. Bueno, P. Fraile, P. García-Cosmes, and R. González-Sarmiento, “A new mutation in the COL4A3 gene responsible for autosomal dominant Alport syndrome, which only generates hearing loss in some carriers,” European Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 35–38, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. Badenas, M. Praga, B. Tazón et al., “Mutations in the COL4A4 and COL4A3 genes cause familial benign hematuria,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1248–1254, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  11. Y. Wu, P. Hu, H. Xu et al., “A novel heterozygous COL4A4 missense mutation in a Chinese family with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 2328–2332, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. X. Wei, X. Ju, X. Yi et al., “Identification of sequence variants in genetic disease genes using targeted next-generation sequencing,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 12, article e29500, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. Li and R. Durbin, “Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform,” vol. 25, no. 14, pp. 1754–1760, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. Li, Y. Li, X. Fang et al., “SNP detection for massively parallel whole-genome resequencing,” Genome Research, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1124–1132, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. H. Li, B. Handsaker, A. Wysoker et al., “The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 2078-2079, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Li, Y. X. Cui, X. Lv et al., “The COL4A3 and COL4A4 digenic mutations in cis result in benign familial hematuria in a large Chinese family,” Cytogenetic and Genome Research, vol. 154, no. 3, pp. 132–136, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. Cerveraacedo, A. Coloma, E. Huarteloza, M. Sierracarpio, and E. Domínguezgarrido, “Phenotype variability in a large Spanish family with Alport syndrome associated with novel mutations in COL4A3 gene,” BMC Nephrology, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 325, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. N. D. Sirisena, S. Thalgahagoda, A. Abeyagunawardena et al., “Novel COL4A3 gene mutations in a consanguineous family with autosomal recessive Alport syndrome,” Nephrology, vol. 20, no. 8, p. 580, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. B. D. Webb, T. Brandt, L. Liu et al., “A founder mutation in COL4A3 causes autosomal recessive Alport syndrome in the Ashkenazi Jewish population,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 155–160, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. L. Papazachariou, P. Demosthenous, M. Pieri et al., “Frequency of COL4A3/COL4A4 mutations amongst families segregating glomerular microscopic hematuria and evidence for activation of the unfolded protein response. Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis is a frequent development during ageing,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 12, article e115015, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. F. Lin, B. Fan, J. Zou et al., “Whole exome sequencing reveals novel COL4A3 and COL4A4 mutations and resolves diagnosis in Chinese families with kidney disease,” BMC Nephrology, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 175, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. S. Uzak, B. Tokgoz, M. Dundar, and M. Tekin, “A novel COL4A3 mutation causes autosomal-recessive Alport syndrome in a large Turkish family,” Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 260–264, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. Hoefele, B. Lange-Sperandio, D. Ruessmann et al., “Novel heterozygous COL4A3 mutation in a family with late-onset ESRD,” Pediatric Nephrology, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1539–1542, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. Cook, C. A. Friedrich, and R. Baliga, “Novel COL4A3 mutations in African American siblings with autosomal recessive Alport syndrome,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. e25–e28, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Slajpah, B. Gorinsek, G. Berginc et al., “Sixteen novel mutations identified in COL4A3, COL4A4, and COL4A5 genes in Slovenian families with Alport syndrome and benign familial hematuria,” Kidney International, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 1287–1295, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. P. Hou, Y. Chen, J. Ding, G. Li, and H. Zhang, “A novel mutation of COL4A3 presents a different contribution to Alport syndrome and thin basement membrane nephropathy,” American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 538–544, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. H. Storey, J. Savige, V. Sivakumar, S. Abbs, and F. A. Flinter, “COL4A3/COL4A4 mutations and features in individuals with autosomal recessive Alport syndrome,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1945–1954, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. J. Tilstra and P. H. Byers, “Molecular basis of hereditary disorders of connective tissue,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 149–163, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. H. Yoshida, “ER stress and diseases,” FEBS Journal, vol. 274, no. 3, pp. 630–658, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. U. Schwarze, J. A. Goldstein, and P. H. Byers, “Splicing defects in the COL3A1 gene: marked preference for 5 (donor) splice-site mutations in patients with exon-skipping mutations and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1276–1286, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. R. Abrahamson, B. G. Hudson, L. Stroganova, D. B. Borza, and P. L. St John, “Cellular origins of type IV collagen networks in developing glomeruli,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1471–1479, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Pieri, C. Stefanou, A. Zaravinos et al., “Evidence for activation of the unfolded protein response in collagen IV nephropathies,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 260–275, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. Colville, J. Savige, M. Morfis et al., “Ocular manifestations of autosomal recessive Alport syndrome,” Ophthalmic Genetics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 119–128, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. W. J. Song, M. G. Sullivan, R. D. Legare et al., “Haploinsufficiency of CBFA2 causes familial thrombocytopenia with propensity to develop acute myelogenous leukaemia,” Nature Genetics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 166–175, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Sánchez-Mejías, Y. Watanabe, R. M. Fernández et al., “Involvement of SOX10 in the pathogenesis of Hirschsprung disease: report of a truncating mutation in an isolated patient,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 507–514, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. Leinonen, “Complete primary structure of human α4 (IV) collagen chain,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 269, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  37. S. Y. Nishio, Y. Takumi, and S. I. Usami, “Laser-capture micro dissection combined with next-generation sequencing analysis of cell type-specific deafness gene expression in the mouse cochlea,” Hearing Research, vol. 348, pp. 87–97, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. A. Mencarelli, L. Heidet, H. Storey et al., “Evidence of digenic inheritance in Alport syndrome,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 163–174, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Liang Xia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1087 Views | 343 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.