Expression Profile Analysis of Differentially Expressed Circular RNAs in Steroid-Induced Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

Zhu, Zhongxin; Du, Wenxi; Yu, Huan; Jin, Hongting; Tong, Peijian

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8759642

Disease Markers

On this page

Abstract Background Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Ethical Approval Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 8759642 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8759642

Expression Profile Analysis of Differentially Expressed Circular RNAs in Steroid-Induced Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

Zhongxin Zhu,^1,2Wenxi Du,³Huan Yu,^1,2Hongting Jin,^1,2and Peijian Tong^2,3

Academic Editor: Alexandra Scholze

Received27 Jun 2019

Revised23 Sept 2019

Accepted08 Oct 2019

Published15 Nov 2019

Abstract

Background. A growing number of studies have suggested that circular RNAs (circRNAs) serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers in many diseases. However, the role of circRNAs in steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head (SONFH) has not been reported. Methods. Secondary sequencing was performed to profile circRNA expression in peripheral blood samples from three SONFH patients and three healthy individuals. We confirmed our preliminary findings by qRT-PCR. Bioinformatics analysis was conducted to predict their functions. Results. The result showed 345 dysregulated circRNAs. qRT-PCR of eight selected circRNAs preliminarily confirmed the results, which were consistent with RNA sequencing. Bioinformatics analyses were performed to predict the functions of circRNAs to target the genes of miRNAs and the networks of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA interactions. Conclusions. This study provides a new and fundamental circRNA profile of SONFH and a theoretical basis for further studies on the functions of circRNAs in SONFH.

1. Background

Steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head (SONFH) is an intractable disorder caused by the use of glucocorticoids (GCs) and leads to the progressive necrosis of osteocytes and the bone marrow [1, 2]. SONFH cases are increasing owing to long-term GC use or high-doses of GCs in patients [3]. Patients with SONFH are commonly asymptomatic, which makes its early diagnosis a challenge. SONFH usually occurs within two years after GC treatment, typically within the first six months [4]. Various joint preservation procedures have been performed for the treatment of precollapse disease [5]. However, in the absence of appropriate therapeutic interventions in the early stage, the collapse of the femoral head may later become unavoidable, resulting in severe secondary osteoarthritis and warranting artificial joint replacement in nearly 70% of patients [6, 7]. Thus, there is an urgent requirement to identify effective diagnostic biomarkers for SONFH.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a large class of noncoding RNAs. Advances in sequencing technologies have led to the recognition that circRNAs are well-expressed in peripheral blood. CircRNAs regulate gene expression by interacting with microRNAs (miRNAs) as sponges and participating in biological activities [8]. Recent studies have shown that circRNAs in blood samples are potential clinical biomarkers for various diseases [9, 10]. However, to our knowledge, no study has profiled circRNA expression in SONFH by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq).

To explore the functions of circRNAs in the development of SONFH, we undertook RNA-seq of samples from SONFH patients and healthy individuals. We identified differentially expressed circRNAs and predicted their functions and pathways. Putative networks of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA interactions were constructed for further studies on clinical diagnosis and treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Case Information

The Institutional Review Board (Protocol Number: 2018-KL-075-02) approved the study, and every participant signed an informed consent form. Six peripheral blood samples were used for RNA-seq, including three patients with SONFH and three healthy control individuals with a history of GC use. Ten pairs for SONFH patients and control subjects were validated by qRT-PCR. The diagnosis of SONFH was based on each patient’s history and imaging (radiograph, CT, and MRI). All patients in the case group were at Ficat stage II or III [11]. The inclusion criteria for SONFH and the control group were that they should have a history of GC use (>2 g within a 3-month period) and should have had no systemic disease, such as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or systemic lupus erythematosus. The two groups were matched for age, sex, race, and region.

2.2. RNA Extraction and circRNA Sequencing

The HiPure PX Blood RNA Mini Kit (Amgen, Guangzhou, China) was used to extract total RNA from fresh blood mixed with three volumes of RNASafer LS Reagent (Amgen). The RNA concentration was obtained by a Qubit 3.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and the integrity was evaluated with the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNase R (Epicentre Technologies, Madison, WI, USA) was used to digest linear RNAs. CircRNA sequencing analysis was performed by Illumina HiSeq X Ten to identify circRNAs in patients with SONFH () and control subjects (). CircRNAs showing a fold and were considered differential expressed. Raw sequence reads are presented in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database [12] (Number: PRJNA522627).

2.3. Bioinformatics Analysis

Functions of target genes and enrichment pathways were analyzed by using Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and Reactome analyses. CircRNA-miRNA-mRNA networks were predicted by miRanda.

2.4. qRT-PCR

qRT-PCR was performed to preliminarily confirm candidate circRNAs in 10 pairs of samples. Total RNA was extracted from all groups by using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Guangzhou, China). qRT-PCR was implemented by using Geneseed qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix on an ABI 7500 system. The relative expression levels of selected circRNAs were determined using the 2^−△△CT method. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase was utilized to normalize RNA preparations. Primer sequences for circRNAs were designed using Primer 5. The primer sequences of the eight selected circRNAs are shown in Table 1, and back-splicing sites are shown in Supplemental figure 1.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed by SPSS 24.0 software. PCR data were analyzed by Student’s -test and presented as the error of the mean; was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. CircRNA Identification

RNA-seq was performed to profile circRNA expression from three patients with SONFH and three healthy individuals. A total of 33,098 circRNAs were discovered. We found that 229 circRNAs were upregulated, and 116 circRNAs were downregulated (Figure 1). Furthermore, we analyzed the category and distribution of the circRNAs (Supplemental figure 2).

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.2. GO, KEGG, and Reactome Analysis

To infer the biological functions of the dysregulated circRNAs in the pathogenesis of SONFH, GO, KEGG, and Reactome analyses were used in this study to predict the function of circRNAs. GO analyses revealed that the most enriched GO terms were in cellular components, molecular functions, and biological processes. The most enriched KEGG pathway included ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis and protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum. The top two pathways in the Reactome analysis were M phase and G2/M transition (Figure 2).

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.3. Validation of RNA-seq by qRT-PCR

To verify the RNA-seq data, eight selected circRNAs were further validated by qRT-PCR. The results were consistent with the RNA-seq data (Figure 3).

3.3.1. Prediction of circRNA-miRNA Interaction Networks and Target Genes for miRNAs

To explore the molecular mechanism and functions of the circRNAs, we investigated potential miRNAs binding with the circRNAs (Figure 4). The circRNA-miRNA-mRNA interaction network of the eight candidate circRNAs was predicted by miRanda and mapped by Cytoscape (Figure 5).

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

In recent years, molecular biology has advanced considerably, and noncoding RNAs are attracting significant attention in the field of medicine. MiRNAs play important roles in the regulation of transcription [13]. Increasing studies have investigated differentially expressed miRNAs related to SONFH, identifying hundreds of such miRNAs [14]. For example, Li et al. investigated miRNA expression in SONFH patients and control individuals. Their data indicated that circulating miRNAs in the serum might play notable roles in the development of SONFH and act as diagnostic biomarkers [15]. Kao et al. compared miRNAs in peripheral blood by microarray and PCR, implying the possibility of using miRNAs as novel diagnostic or therapeutic targets [16].

Compared with miRNAs, circRNAs are more promising diagnostic biomarkers because they are more stable [17]. Being closed loops, circRNAs are not easily degraded by exonucleases. In addition, the half-life of circRNAs is doubled that of linear RNAs [18]. CircRNAs are reproducibly and easily detected in clinical blood samples. Stable and enriched circRNAs have been found in peripheral blood [19, 20], as well as blood components, such as exosomes [21], plasma [22], platelets [23], erythrocytes [24], and mononuclear cells [25].

For this study, we used peripheral blood. Our study found 229 upregulated circRNAs and 116 downregulated circRNAs. We further selected eight circRNAs for preliminary qRT-PCR validation based on a combination of previous studies and the circRNA-miRNA prediction network (Table 2) [15, 26–29]. The results indicated that the RNA-seq data was reliable and worthy of further study.

The use of GCs—oral, intravenous, or even inhaled—may alter the characteristics of peripheral blood and strongly affect the blood supply to the femoral head. Fat embolism and coagulation disorders are two of the most common causes of interrupted blood supply. GCs could directly or indirectly lead to hypofibrinolysis and thrombophilia, dysfunction and apoptosis of endothelial cells, lipid metabolism alterations, and platelet activation, which are followed by poor blood flow, ischemia, and eventually, osteonecrosis [30–33]. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of GCs differs among individuals owing to varied GC sensitivity [34].

As compared to invasive organ biopsy, the blood-based biomarker assay is a relatively economical and noninvasive method to detect disease, owing to its ease of accessibility and the low risk associated with sample collection. In previous studies, noncoding RNA expression patterns in peripheral blood have been used as the basis for the detection of disease [35–40]. However, peripheral blood can be affected by various factors. It is possible that changes in the expression profile of the disease reflect shifts in cell populations [41], which is a potential confounding factor to be considered.

Although we identified the differentially expressed circRNAs in SONFH, the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. With the advance of high-throughput sequencing technologies, GO annotations have been good predictors of the functions and trends of genes [42]. KEGG is a reference knowledge database that describes the functional pathways that contribute to disease processes, and it is extensively used in enrichment analyses [43, 44]. Reactome analysis is utilized to visualize mRNA expression data and can be combined with other databases [45]. The molecular mechanism underlying the interactions of circRNAs and miRNAs in SONFH has not been deciphered. Therefore, the circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network was built based on our RNA-seq data. Understanding the interaction between the different pathways could provide novel strategies for managing bone disease [46]. These original findings might enhance our understanding of the functions of circRNAs in the mechanism of SONFH. For example, circ_0004692 may control hsa-miR-222-3p, which could further regulate the expression of the target gene SETD2. However, a single circRNA interacts with multiple miRNAs, and the target gene is regulated by many miRNAs. Network prediction may enrich future studies with novel perspectives to confirm the association between these dysregulated circRNAs and miRNAs in SONFH.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, by RNA-seq, we identified 345 differentially expressed candidate circRNAs in SONFH. We also preliminarily confirmed the results by qRT-PCR with a small sample and conducted bioinformatics analysis to predict their functions. Our study provides a novel theoretical basis for further research on the functions of circRNAs in SONFH. However, large-sample validation and studies on specific regulatory mechanisms are required to realize the potential value of circRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for SONFH in a more complete and in-depth manner.

Data Availability

Raw sequence reads are presented in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database.

Ethical Approval

The Institutional Review Board (Protocol Number: 2018-KL-075-02) approved the study.

Every participant signed an informed consent.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

ZZ designed the research, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. WD provided the patients’ samples. HY and HJ performed the experiments. PT designed the research, provided the patients’ samples, and revised the paper.

Acknowledgments

The study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81873324, 81873325, and 81774332).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary 1. Supplementary figure 1. Back-splicing sites of the eight selected circRNAs.

Supplementary 2. Supplementary figure 2. Characteristic of the identified circular RNAs by RNA sequencing. (A) The pie diagram shows the genomic origin of the detected circRNAs. Most of the circRNAs originate from the exons. (B) The circos plots shows the dysregulated circRNAs on human chromosomes. CircRNA: circular RNA.

References

C. Carulli, L. Nistri, L. Bracco, M. Giannini, and M. P. Amato, “A steroid-induced bilateral avascular necrosis of the femoral head in an underage patient affected by multiple sclerosis,” Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 257–259, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Liu, W. Wang, L. Yang et al., “An epidemiological study of etiology and clinical characteristics in patients with nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 15, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ikeuchi, Y. Hasegawa, T. Seki, Y. Takegami, T. Amano, and N. Ishiguro, “Epidemiology of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head in Japan,” Modern Rheumatology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 278–281, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Fu, B. Liu, B. Wang, and D. Zhao, “Early diagnosis and treatment of steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1083–1087, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Mont, J. J. Cherian, R. J. Sierra, L. C. Jones, and J. R. Lieberman, “Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: where do we stand today? A ten-year update,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, vol. 97, no. 19, pp. 1604–1627, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. van der Jagt, L. Mokete, J. Pietrzak, C. G. Zalavras, and J. R. Lieberman, “Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: evaluation and treatment,” The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 69-70, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Zhao, S. Huang, F. Lu et al., “Vascularized bone grafting fixed by biodegradable magnesium screw for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” Biomaterials, vol. 81, pp. 84–92, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. R. Kulcheski, A. P. Christoff, and R. Margis, “Circular RNAs are miRNA sponges and can be used as a new class of biomarker,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 238, pp. 42–51, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. C. S. Lee, S. A. M. Elhassan, G. P. L. Lim et al., “The roles of circular RNAs in human development and diseases,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 111, pp. 198–208, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhang, T. Yang, and J. Xiao, “Circular RNAs: promising biomarkers for human diseases,” eBioMedicine, vol. 34, pp. 267–274, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Ficat, “Idiopathic bone necrosis of the femoral head. Early diagnosis and treatment,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, vol. 67-B, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Leinonen, H. Sugawara, M. Shumway, and on behalf of the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration, “The sequence read archive,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, no. Database, pp. D19–D21, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Carulli, E. Luzi, and M. L. Brandi, “MicroRNA in Regenerative Medicine-1st Edition,” Print book & E-book, Academic Press.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Wang, M. Ren, and J. Wang, “The pathogenesis of steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review of the literature,” Gene, vol. 671, pp. 103–109, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Li, C. Jiang, X. Li et al., “Circulating microRNA signature of steroid‐induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” Cell Proliferation, vol. 51, no. 1, p. e12418, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Kao, Y. K. Tu, P. H. Sung et al., “MicroRNA-mediated interacting circuits predict hypoxia and inhibited osteogenesis of stem cells, and dysregulated angiogenesis are involved in osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1605–1614, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. G. Zhuang, J. A. Zhang, H. L. Luo et al., “The circular RNA of peripheral blood mononuclear cells: Hsa_circ_0005836 as a new diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic target of active pulmonary tuberculosis,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 90, pp. 264–272, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Li, Z. H. Rong, N. B. Chang et al., “Expression profile of circular RNA in rat intimal hyperplasia and target gene prediction,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 234, no. 9, pp. 15225–15234, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Luo, L. Zhang, X. Li et al., “Identification of circular RNAs hsa_circ_0044235 in peripheral blood as novel biomarkers for rheumatoid arthritis,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 118–124, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Memczak, P. Papavasileiou, O. Peters, and N. Rajewsky, “Identification and characterization of circular RNAs as a new class of putative biomarkers in human blood,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 10, article e0141214, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, Q. Zheng, C. Bao et al., “Circular RNA is enriched and stable in exosomes: a promising biomarker for cancer diagnosis,” Cell Research, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 981–984, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Li, Y. Wang, X. Song et al., “Potential regulatory role of circular RNA in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 3256–3268, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Alhasan, O. G. Izuogu, H. H. Al-Balool et al., “Circular RNA enrichment in platelets is a signature of transcriptome degradation,” Blood, vol. 127, no. 9, pp. e1–e11, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Qian, H. Liu, M. Li et al., “Potential diagnostic power of blood circular RNA expression in active pulmonary tuberculosis,” eBioMedicine, vol. 27, pp. 18–26, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. X. Liu, X. Li, F. Nan et al., “Structure and degradation of circular RNAs regulate PKR activation in innate immunity,” Cell, vol. 177, no. 4, pp. 865–880.e21, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, W. Qian, Z. Wu, Y. Bian, and X. Weng, “Preliminary screening of differentially expressed circulating microRNAs in patients with steroid‑induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 3118–3124, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Jia, X. Feng, W. Xu et al., “MiR-17-5p modulates osteoblastic differentiation and cell proliferation by targeting SMAD7 in non-traumatic osteonecrosis,” Experimental & Molecular Medicine, vol. 46, no. 7, article e107, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Wang, P. Yu, T. Li, Y. Bian, and X. Weng, “MicroRNA expression in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from mice with steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 7447–7454, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Bian, W. Qian, H. Li, R. C. Zhao, W. X. Shan, and X. Weng, “Pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced avascular necrosis: a microarray analysis of gene expression in vitro,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 678–684, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Motomura, T. Yamamoto, K. Miyanishi, A. Yamashita, K. Sueishi, and Y. Iwamoto, “Bone marrow fat-cell enlargement in early steroid-induced osteonecrosis--a histomorphometric study of autopsy cases,” Pathology, Research and Practice, vol. 200, no. 11-12, pp. 807–811, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhang, L. VJ, and L. Jin, “Role of coagulopathy in glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” The Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 2141–2148, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Chen, S. Yang, Y. Feng et al., “Impairment of two types of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with glucocorticoid-induced avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head,” Joint, Bone, Spine, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 70–76, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Seamon, T. Keller, J. Saleh, and Q. Cui, “The pathogenesis of nontraumatic osteonecrosis,” Arthritis, vol. 2012, Article ID 601763, 11 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. W. Cain and J. A. Cidlowski, “Specificity and sensitivity of glucocorticoid signaling in health and disease,” Best Practice & Research. Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 545–556, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, N. Zhang, Z. Wang, D. M. Ai, Z. Y. Cao, and H. P. Pan, “Decreased MiR-155 level in the peripheral blood of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients may serve as a biomarker and may influence LXR activity,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 2239–2248, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Pang, M. Liu, W. Fang et al., “MiR-139-5p is increased in the peripheral blood of patients with prostate cancer,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1111–1117, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Al-Kafaji, Z. T. Al-Naieb, and M. Bakhiet, “Increased oncogenic microRNA-18a expression in the peripheral blood of patients with prostate cancer: a potential novel non-invasive biomarker,” Oncology Letters, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1201–1206, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, Z. Zhao, D. Jian, W. Li, H. Tang, and M. Li, “Hsa-circRNA11783-2 in peripheral blood is correlated with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 510–515, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhao, X. Li, C. Gao et al., “Peripheral blood circular RNA hsa_circ_0124644 can be used as a diagnostic biomarker of coronary artery disease,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 39918, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhao, X. Li, D. Jian, P. Hao, L. Rao, and M. Li, “Hsa_circ_0054633 in peripheral blood can be used as a diagnostic biomarker of pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Acta Diabetologica, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 237–245, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Keller, P. Leidinger, A. Bauer et al., “Toward the blood-borne miRNome of human diseases,” Nature methods, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 841–843, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Yu, C. Lu, and J. Wang, “NoGOA: predicting noisy GO annotations using evidences and sparse representation,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 350, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kanehisa, Y. Sato, M. Furumichi, K. Morishima, and M. Tanabe, “New approach for understanding genome variations in KEGG,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 47, no. D1, pp. D590–d595, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, Y. H. Zhang, Q. Zou, C. Chu, and Z. Ji, “Analysis of the chemical toxicity effects using the enrichment of gene ontology terms and KEGG pathways,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, vol. 1860, no. 11, pp. 2619–2626, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bauer-Mehren, L. I. Furlong, and F. Sanz, “Pathway databases and tools for their exploitation: benefits, current limitations and challenges,” Molecular Systems Biology, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 290, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Carulli, M. Innocenti, F. Lazzarini et al., “The biomolecular interactions between endothelium and bone cells: an overview,” Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, vol. 32, 6 Suppl. 1, pp. 173–179, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Zhongxin Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

734

Downloads

991

Citations