Research Article
Prediction of COVID-19 with Computed Tomography Images using Hybrid Learning Techniques
Table 12
Confusion matrix and classification report for proposed work, Resnet50 for feature extraction, and machine learning models for classification.
| Confusion matrix | Classification report | Models | Category | COVID-19 | CAP | Normal | Total | Category | Precision | Recall | F1Score | Specificity |
| Resnet50+SVM | COVID-19 | 104 | 4 | 3 | 111 | COVID-19 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.94 | CAP | 3 | 104 | 4 | 111 | CAP | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | Normal | 3 | 4 | 104 | 111 | Normal | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.94 | Total | 110 | 112 | 111 | 333 | Average | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| Resnet50+Random Forest | COVID-19 | 105 | 3 | 3 | 111 | COVID-19 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.97 | CAP | 3 | 104 | 4 | 111 | CAP | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.97 | Normal | 3 | 3 | 105 | 111 | Normal | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.97 | Total | 111 | 110 | 111 | 333 | Average | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.97 |
| Resnet50+Decision Tree | COVID-19 | 102 | 4 | 5 | 111 | COVID-19 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.96 | CAP | 4 | 103 | 4 | 111 | CAP | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.96 | Normal | 4 | 5 | 102 | 111 | Normal | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.96 | Total | 110 | 11 | 111 | 333 | Average | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.96 |
| Resnet50+Naive Bayes | COVID-19 | 97 | 7 | 7 | 111 | COVID-19 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.94 | CAP | 7 | 96 | 8 | 111 | CAP | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.94 | Normal | 8 | 6 | 97 | 111 | Normal | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.93 | Total | 112 | 109 | 112 | 333 | Average | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.94 |
| Resnet50+KNN | COVID-19 | 102 | 5 | 4 | 111 | COVID-19 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.95 | CAP | 5 | 101 | 5 | 111 | CAP | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.96 | Normal | 4 | 4 | 103 | 111 | Normal | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.96 | Total | 111 | 110 | 112 | 333 | Average | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.96 |
|
|