Research Article

FSIP1 Is Associated with Poor Prognosis and Can Be Used to Construct a Prognostic Model in Gastric Cancer

Table 1

The relationship between the expression of FSIP1 and clinicopathological characteristics.

CharacteristicHigh expressionLow expression value

Number of patients63103
Age, 0.052
Weight, (median, IQR)63 (55, 69.5)65 (59.5, 72.5)0.117
BMI, (median, IQR)22.43 (19.58, 24.11)23.03 (20.79, 24.93)0.159
NLR, (median, IQR)1.9 (1.3, 2.73)1.95 (1.38, 2.6)0.987
PLR, (median, IQR)125.49 (100.25, 146.47)116.75 (95.03, 151.9)0.529
CD4, 0.075
CD8, (median, IQR)23.3 (18.6, 29.85)21.6 (16.95, 26.75)0.170
CA19-9, (median, IQR)10.32 (6.21, 19.96)10.54 (6.21, 25.54)0.874
CA72-4, (median, IQR)3.65 (1.53, 6.55)2.19 (1.37, 6.03)0.105
CA125, (median, IQR)10.15 (6.95, 14.34)9.27 (6.52, 14.02)0.592
a Pathologic stage, (%)< 0.001
 I11 (6.6%)47 (28.3%)
 II17 (10.2%)39 (23.5%)
 III35 (21.1%)17 (10.2%)
Location, (%)0.003
 L42 (25.3%)66 (39.8%)
 M9 (5.4%)32 (19.3%)
 U10 (6%)5 (3%)
 Entire2 (1.2%)0 (0%)
WHO classification, (%)0.093
 Mucinous8 (4.8%)5 (3%)
 Poor differentiated10 (6%)27 (16.3%)
 Signet ring cell19 (11.4%)22 (13.3%)
 Well to moderate differentiated26 (15.7%)49 (29.5%)
Vascular invasion, (%)0.329
 Negative50 (30.1%)89 (53.6%)
 Positive13 (7.8%)14 (8.4%)
Neural invasion, (%)0.012
 Negative27 (16.3%)66 (39.8%)
 Positive36 (21.7%)37 (22.3%)

a Based on the 8th of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual of the American Joint Committee on Cancer.