Review Article

Cupping for Treating Pain: A Systematic Review

Table 1

Summary of randomized clinical trials of cupping for pain conditions.

First author (year) (ref.), CountrySample size condition/disease durationIntervention (regimen)Control (regimen)Total sessionPain related main outcomeMain resultsMeasurement timeRisk of bias

Huang (2006) [7], China60/cancer pain/5–17 months(A) Dry-cupping (maintain: 5 min, repeat + maintain: 10–15 min, once a day for 3 days, n = 30), plus none(B) Opioid (Propoxyphene Napsylate and Paracetamol, two tablets, three times daily for 3 days, n = 30)3(1) Response rate (% reduction of pain ≥ 70%) (2) Pain free duration (h), (1) A (28/30, 67%); B (13/30, 43%),P = .001 (2) A (mean 5.06, range 3–8); B (mean 3.65, range 2–6), P < .05Baseline: before intervention Post: after final intervention(Y,U,U,U,U)
Hong (2006) [8], China70/non-specific low back pain/1 week to 3.1 years(A) Dry cupping (moving cupping, 5 min, 1/2 days for 11 days, n = 37), plus none(B) NSAIDs (Dexibuprofen, 0.15 g, three times daily for 12 days, n = 33)6(1) Pain on VAS (100 mm) (2) Response rate (% change of VAS ≥ 80%) (1) Mean difference 22.8 (95% CI, 11.4–34.2), P < .0001 in favor of (A) (2) A (21/37, 57%); B (9/33, 27%),P = .03Baseline: before intervention Post: after final intervention(Y,Y,U,U,U,U)
Zhang (1997) [9], China45/acute trigeminal neuralgia/6  days to 4 years(A) Wet-cupping (15 min, once a day for 6 days and then once every other day for three sessions, n = 30), plus none(B) Analgesics (AP-237 50 mg (IM, only first day) and then 60 mg (oral, three times daily for 12 days), n = 15)9Response rateA (28/30, 93%); B(7/15, 47%), P = .002Baseline: before intervention Post: after final intervention(Y,U,U,U,U,U)
Farhadi (2009) [10], Iran98/non-specific low back pain/≥4 weeks (A) Wet-cupping (20 min, three stage, 3 days intervals, n = 48), plus (B)(B) Usual care (n = 50)3PPI of the MPQ (6-point Likert scale)Mean difference 2.2 points (95% CI, 1.7–2.6), P < .01 in favor of (A)Baseline: before start trial Post: 3 months after final intervention(Y,Y,Y,U,U,Y)
Lüdtke (2006) [11], Germany20/BPN/n.r.(A) Wet-cupping (10 min, once, n = 10), plus (B) (B) Usual care (analgesics, physiotherapies, psychological care, musicotherapy, n = 10)1Pain in Brachialgia Score (NAS, 10-point Likert scale)Mean difference 1.6 (95% CI, 0.13–3.07), P = .03 in favor of (A)Baseline: mean 7 days pre-treatment score (days 1–7) Post: mean 7 daily post-treatment score (days 9–15)(A,A,A,U,U,A)
Michalsen (2007) [12]a, Germany52/BPN/n.r.(A) Wet-cupping (10 min, once, n = 26), plus (B)(B) Heat pad (n = 26)1(1) Pain in Brachialgia Score (100 mm VAS) (2) Neck pain (100 mm VAS)(1) Mean difference 22.9 (95% CI, 10.5–35.3), P < .001 in favor of (A) (2) Mean difference 12.6 (95% CI, 6.4–18.8), P < .001Baseline: pre-treatment Post: 7 day after treatment(Y,Y,U,U,Y,Y)
Xu (2004) [13], China80/Herpes zoster/1–3 days(A) Wet-cupping (15 min, once a day for 7  days, n = 40), plus (B)(B) Anti viral (Aciclovir 0.5 g + 5% DW 250 ml (IV), plus Aciclovir cream (external use), two times daily for 7  days, n = 40)7Response rate (% degree of pain ≥ 60%)40/40, 100%); B (35/40, 88%), P = .065Baseline: before intervention Post: after final intervention(Y,U,U,U,U,U)

Risk of bias (randomization, randomization method, drop-out or withdraw, patient blind, assessor blind, allocation concealment). Y: low risk of bias ; U: unclear; N: high risk of bias; BPN: Brachialgia paraesthetica nocturna; MPQ: McGill Pain Questionnaire; NAS: Numeric Analogue Scale; n.r.: not reported; NS: not significant; NSAID: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PPI: Present Pain Intensity; VAS: Visual analogue scale.
aThe authors were contacted and details were based on information from them.