Body Mass Index and Facial Cues in Sasang Typology for Young and Elderly Persons
Table 4
BMI and facial metrics in association with TE types: logistic regression analysis.
Comparison unit
M20s
M60s
F20s
F60s
OR (CI 95%)
statistic
OR (CI 95%)
statistic
OR (CI 95%)
c statistic
OR (CI 95%)
statistic
BMI
1
1.63 (1.42–1.88)
0.81
1.52 (1.33–1.74)
0.78
1.62 (1.39–1.89)
0.77
1.79 (1.51–2.11)
0.82
PAR
0.002sd
0.61 (0.46–0.81)
0.63
0.91 (0.70–1.20)
0.53
0.75 (0.57–0.99)
0.58
0.72 (0.54–0.95)
0.58
WHR
0.14sd
1.60 (1.21–2.12)
0.64
1.74 (1.28– 2.35)
0.65
1.28 (0.98–1.67)
0.57
1.04 (0.8–1.35)
0.54
CJWR
0.05sd
0.45 (0.33–0.63)
0.69
0.35 (0.24–0.51)
0.74
0.59 (0.44–0.80)
0.64
0.52 (0.38–0.70)
0.67
Eye size
1
1.22 (1.05–1.42)
0.60
1.18 (1.03– 1.35)
0.61
1.13 (0.96–1.32)
0.56
1.09 (0.96–1.25)
0.55
LF-FH
0.02sd
1.27 (0.98–1.66)
0.56
1.09 (0.83–1.43)
0.53
1.42 (1.08–1.86)
0.60
1.57 (1.19–2.07)
0.62
FW-LF
0.06sd
1.29 (0.99–1.69)
0.58
1.30 (0.98–1.71)
0.57
0.82 (0.63–1.07)
0.45
0.95 (0.73–1.24)
0.48
EH mean
1
1.03 (0.9–1.19)
0.51
1.03 (0.94–1.13)
0.52
0.99 (0.86–1.13)
0.51
1.08 (0.98–1.18)
0.57
M20s: male-twenties group; F20s: female-twenties group; M60s: male-sixties group; F60s: female-sixties group.
sdThe comparison unit was adjusted to be close to the standard deviation of each potential predictive factors.