Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 969343, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nep023
Original Article

Allopathic versus Homeopathic Strategies and the Recurrence of Prescriptions: Results from a Pharmacoeconomic Study in Italy

1Italian Society of Anthroposophic Medicine, Department of Public Institutions, Economy and Society, University of Roma Tre and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rome, Italy
2Department of Public Institutions, Economy and Society, University of Roma Tre, Via G. Chiabrera 199 - 00146 Rome, Italy
3Expert for CAM, Italian High Council of Health, Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy

Received 21 July 2008; Accepted 3 March 2009

Copyright © 2011 Andrea Basili et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. L. Sarnat and J. Winterstein, “Clinical and cost outcomes of an integrative medicine IPA,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 336–347, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  2. J. Sommer, M. Burgi, and R. Theiss, “Inclusion of complementary medicine increases health costs,” Complementary Therapies in Medicine, vol. 7, pp. 54–61, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  3. G. Chaufferin, “Improving the evaluation of homeopathy: economic considerations and impact on health,” Homeopathy, vol. 89, no. 1, supplement, pp. S27–S30, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. White, “Economic evaluation of acupuncture,” Acupuncture in Medicine, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 109–113, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  5. A. R. White, K. L. Resch, and E. Ernst, “Methods of economic evaluation in complementary medicine,” Forschende Komplementarmedizin und Klassische Naturheilkunde, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 336–347, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. H. MacLennan, D. H. Wilson, and A. W. Taylor, “The escalating cost and prevalence of alternative medicine,” Preventive Medicine, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 166–173, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Trichard, G. Chaufferin, and N. Nicoloyannis, “Pharmaeconomic comparison between homeopathic and antibiotic treatment strategies in recurrent acute rhinopharyngitis in children,” Homeomathy, vol. 94, pp. 3–9, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  8. N. Robinson, J. Donaldson, and H. Watt, “Auditing outcomes and costs of integrated complementary medicine provision-The importance of length of follow up,” Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 249–257, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. A. Jain, “Does homeopathy reduce the cost of conventional drug prescribing? A study of comparative prescribing costs in general practice,” Homeopathy, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 71–76, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. C. Witt, T. Keil, S. Dagmar, S. Roll, R. Vance, K. Wegscheider et al., “Outcome and costs of homeopatic and conventional treatment strategies: a comparative cohort study in patients with chronic disorders,” Complementary Therapies in Medicine, vol. 13, pp. 79–86, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. R. Cox, “Regression models and life-tables (with discussion),” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, vol. 34, pp. 187–220, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  12. T. M. Therneau, P. M. Grambsch, and V. S. Pankratz, “Penalized survival models and frailty,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 156–175, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. P. Grambsch and T. Therneau, “Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals,” Biometrika, vol. 81, pp. 515–526, 1994. View at Google Scholar