|
Before sensitivity analysis | | After sensitivity analysis |
Comparisons | MD (model) 95% CI | P value | (%) |
Method of sensitivity analysis | Comparisons | MD (model) 95% CI | P value | (%) |
|
Baduanjin + routine treatment versus routine treatment for TC in clinical patients |
5 | −0.56 (random) (−0.74, 0.37) | | 86 | Remove Zhang 2005 and Zhang 2008 | 3 | −0.83 (fixed) (−1.04, −0.62) | | 0 |
Baduanjin + routine treatment versus other exercises for TC in clinical patients |
3 | −0.01 (random) (−0.25, 0.24) | | 68 | Remove Zhang 2008 | 2 | −0.17 (fixed) (−0.45, 0.11) | | 0 |
Baduanjin + routine treatment versus routine treatment for HDL-C in clinical patients |
5 | 0.04 (random) (−0.1, 0.18) | | 73 | Remove Zhang 2008 | 4 | 0.12 (fixed) (0.06, 0.18) | | 51 |
Baduanjin versus no treatment for HDL-C in health adults |
9 | 0.13 (random) (0.06, 0.21) | | 56 | Remove Liu et al. 2006 | 8 | 0.16 (fixed) (0.11, 0.21) | | 19 |
Baduanjin + routine treatment versus routine treatment for TG in clinical patients |
4 | −0.77 (random) (−1.97, 0.42) | | 94 | Remove Wang et al. 2007 | 3 | −0.16 (fixed) (−0.49, 0.17) | | 0 |
Baduanjin + routine treatment versus other exercises plus routine treatment for LDL-C in clinical patients |
3 | 0.08 (random) (−0.43, 0.58) | | 88 | Remove Zhou et al. 2011 | 2 | 0.29 (fixed) (0.05, 0.53) | | 53 |
|