Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2012, Article ID 531096, 5 pages
Research Article

Building a Strategic Framework for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Complementary and Integrative Medicine

1Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany
2Center for Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
3Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
4Quintiles Outcome, Durham, NC, USA
5Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
6Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
7Center for Health Economics and Science Policy, BioSource Corporation, Bethesda, MD, USA
8Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
9Marino Center for Integrative Health, Cambridge, MA, USA
10The Institute for Integrative Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
11Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
12Center for Medical Technology Policy, Baltimore, MD, USA

Received 9 November 2012; Accepted 10 December 2012

Academic Editor: Andreas Sandner-Kiesling

Copyright © 2012 Claudia M. Witt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. “Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),” 2010,
  2. M. Campbell, R. Fitzpatrick, A. Haines et al., “Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health,” British Medical Journal, vol. 321, no. 7262, pp. 694–696, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. “National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM),” 2012,
  4. “Consortium of Academic Health Center for Integrative Medicine,” 2012,
  5. A. Metcalfe, J. Williams, J. McChesney, S. B. Patten, and N. Jetté, “Use of complementary and alternative medicine by those with a chronic disease and the general population—results of a national population based survey,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 10, article 58, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. M. Barnes, B. Bloom, and R. L. Nahin, “Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007,” National Health Statistics Reports, no. 12, pp. 1–23, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Last, R. A. Spasoff, and S. Harris, A Dictionary of Epidemiology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2001.
  8. V. Fønnebø, S. Grimsgaard, H. Walach et al., “Researching complementary and alternative treatments —the gatekeepers are not at home,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 7, article 7, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. Cardini, C. Wade, A. L. Regalia et al., “Clinical research in traditional medicine: priorities and methods,” Complementary Therapies in Medicine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 282–287, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Institute of Medicine, “What is comparative effectiveness research?” in Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  11. H. V. Fineberg, “Shattuck Lecture. A successful and sustainable health system—how to get there from here,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 366, no. 11, pp. 1020–1027, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. M. VanLare, P. H. Conway, and H. C. Sox, “Five next steps for a new national program for comparative-effectiveness research,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 11, pp. 970–973, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Hoffman, R. Montgomery, W. Aubry, and S. R. Tunis, “How best to engage patients, doctors, and other stakeholders in designing comparative effectiveness studies,” Health Affairs, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1834–1841, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. R. Tunis, J. Benner, and M. McClellan, “Comparative effectiveness research: policy context, methods development and research infrastructure,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 29, no. 19, pp. 1963–1976, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. “Summary of Stakeholder Symposium,” 2010,
  16. “Complex Interventions Guidance,” 2012,
  17. “Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Preliminary Draft Methodology Report: Our Questions, Our Decisions: Standards for Patient-centered Outcomes Research,” 2012,
  18. “National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Community engagement to improve health,” 2008,
  19. H. C. Sox, “Comparative effectiveness research: a progress report,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 153, no. 7, pp. 469–472, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. “Effectiveness Guidance Documents. Center for Medical Technology Policy,” 2012,