Review Article
Chinese Herbal Medicine Paratherapy for Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of 19 Randomized Controlled Trials
Table 5
Forest plot of comparison: Chinese herbal medicine versus conventional treatment: UPDRS II scores.
| Study or subgroup | Experimental | Control | Mean difference | Mean difference | Mean | SD | Total | Mean | SD | Total | Weight | lV, fixed, 95% Cl | lV, fixed, 95% Cl |
| Dou et al. [32] | 11.01 | 5.73 | 35 | 13.39 | 6.48 | 35 | 8.8% | −2.38 [−5.25, 0.49] | | Fan et al. [31] | 10.83 | 5.658 | 30 | 12.86 | 4.872 | 30 | 10.1% | −2.03 [−4.70, 0.64] | Li et al. [33] | 11.52 | 5.39 | 47 | 14.61 | 6.04 | 44 | 13.0% | −3.09 [−5.45, −0.73] | Luo et al. [21] | 8.31 | 5.05 | 22 | 12.73 | 6.703 | 19 | 5.3% | −4.42 [−8.10, −0.74] | Pan et al. [35] | 13.4 | 9.8 | 56 | 15.3 | 11.6 | 54 | 4.5% | −1.90 [−5.92, 2.12] | Wu et al. [34] | 7.15 | 7.09 | 40 | 9.86 | 6.73 | 40 | 7.9% | −2.71 [−5.74, 0.32] | Yuan et al. [29] | 16.47 | 4.45 | 60 | 18.19 | 4.51 | 60 | 28.1% | −1.72 [−3.32, −0.12] | Zhao et al. [26] | 10.67 | 6.45 | 75 | 11.84 | 7.74 | 79 | 14.3% | −1.17 [−3.42, 1.08] | Zheng and Luo [22] | 10.73 | 6.65 | 30 | 12.97 | 4.97 | 30 | 8.2% | −2.24 [−5.21, 0.73] | Total (95% Cl) | | | 395 | | | 391 | 100.0% | −2.18 [3.03, −1.33] | Heterogeneity: Chi2 = 3.26; df = 8 (); = 0% | | | | Test for overall effect: = 5.03 () | | | | |
|
|