Review Article
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Education for Medical Profession: Systematic Review
Table 2
Methodological Quality of Included Studies.
| Domain | Item | Item Score | Hewson et al. 2006 [15] | Hoellein et al. 2009 [16] | Cook et al. 2007 [17] | Ashar et al. 2008 [18] |
Ben-Aryee and Frenkel 2004 [19] | Ben-Aryee et al. 2006 [20] | Donald et al. 2010 [26] |
Forjuoh et al. 2003 [21] | Halterman-Cox et al. 2009 [22] |
Lu and Torres-Harding 2007 [23] | Mikail et al. 2003 [24] | Torkelson et al. 2006 [25] | Number of studies (%) | Mean item score (SD) | Mean domain score (SD) |
| Study Design | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.79 (0.58) | | (1) Study Design: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.79 (0.58) | | | Single group pre and post-test | 1.5 | | | | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 (75) | | | | Non randomized, 2 group | 2 | | | x | | | | | | | | | | 1 (8.33) | | | | Randomized controlled experiment | 3 | x | x | | | | | | | | | | | 2 (16.67) | | |
| Sampling | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.90 (0.47) | | (2) Institutions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.58 (0.29) | | | Single institution | 0.5 | x | x | x | | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 11 (91.67) | | | | Two institutions | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | More than 2 institutions | 1.5 | | | | x | | | | | | | | | 1 (8.33) | | | | (3) Response Rate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.21 (0.40) | | | Response rate <50% or not reported | 0.5 | | | | x | | | | | | x | | | 2 (16.67) | | | | Response rate 50–74% | 1 | | | | | | | x | | x | | x | | 3 (25) | | | | Response rate ≥75% | 1.5 | x | x | x | | x | x | | x | | | | x | 7 (58.33) | | | Type of Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.83 (1.03) | | (4) Type of Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.83 (1.03) | | | Assessment by study subject | 1 | x | | | | x | | x | x | x | x | | x | 7 (58.33) | | | | Objective measurement | 3 | | x | x | x | | x | | | | | x | | 5 (41.67) | | |
| Validity of Evaluation Instruments’ Scores | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.36 (0.49) | | (5) Internal Structure: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.08 (0.29) | | | Not reported | 0 | | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 11 (91.67) | | | | Reported | 1 | x | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 (8.33) | | | | (6) Content: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 (0) | | | Not reported | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | Reported | 1 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 12 (100) | | | | (7) Relationships to other variables: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Not reported | 0 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 12 (100) | 0 (0) | | | Reported | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | Data Analysis | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.38 (0.49) | | (8) Appropriateness of analysis: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 (0) | | | Data analysis inappropriate for study design or type of data | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | | | Data analysis appropriate for study design and type of data | 1 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 12 (100) | | | | (9) Sophistication of analysis: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.75 (0.45) | | | Descriptive analysis only | 1 | | | | | x | x | | | | | | x | 3 (25) | | | | Beyond descriptive analysis | 2 | x | x | x | x | | | x | x | x | x | x | | 9 (75) | | |
| Outcome | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.58 (0.42) | | (10) Outcome: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.58 (0.42) | | | Satisfaction, attitudes, perceptions, opinions, general facts | 1 | | | | | | | x | x | | | | x | 3 (25) | | | | Knowledge, skills | 1.5 | | x | | x | | | | | | x | x | | 4 (33.33) | | | | Behaviors | 2 | x | | x | | x | x | | | x | | | | 5 (41.67) | | | | Patient/health care outcome | 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | 18.0 | 13.0 | 13.5 | 13.0 | 12.0 | 9.5 | 11.5 | 9.0 | 9.5 | 10.0 | 9.0 | 11.5 | 8.5 | | | 10.83 (1.79) |
|
|