Research Article

Greater Skeletal Gains in Ovary Intact Rats at Maturity Are Achieved by Supplementing a Standardized Extract of Butea monosperma Stem Bark that Confers Better Bone Conserving Effect following Ovariectomy and Concurrent Treatment Withdrawal

Table 3

Effect on body weight, bone biochemical markers, trabecular bone mass, microarchitecture, and strength following ovariectomy and treatment withdrawal at the endpoint.

ParametersSham + vehicle
(1% gum acacia)
OVx + vehicle
(1% gum acacia)
OVx + vehicle
(1% gum acacia) (ASFW)
OVx + E2
(10 μg/kg/day)

Body weight (gm)232.3 ± 8.89303.1 ± 8.27p297.4 ± 7.93p276.7 ± 13.05r
Bone biochemical markers
 Serum OCN (ng/mL)105.49 ± 8.76p244.96 ± 6.76203.93 ± 9.84q,a97.27 ± 9.99p,e
 Urinary CTx (ng/mL)46.75 ± 11.4p113.69 ± 4.6676.6 ± 3.23p,b66.37 ± 3.24p,c
BMD (g HA/cm3)
 Femur metaphysis0.234 ± 0.01q0.166 ± 0.0010.198 ± 0.007r0.185 ± 0.01r
 Proximal tibia metaphysis0.248 ± 0.01p0.118 ± 0.0060.17 ± 0.006q,a0.171 ± 0.01q,a
 Vertebral cancellous bone0.31 ± 0.014p0.219 ± 0.0060.264 ± 0.007q,b0.265 ± 0.009q,b
Micro-CT measurements at femur cancellous bone
 BV/TV (%)24.8 ± 1.87p12.07 ± 0.1217.12 ± 0.38p,a14.12 ± 0.56r,a,f
 Tb.N (1/mm)2.67 ± 0.27p1.27 ± 0.011.79 ± 0.06r,a1.71 ± 0.05r,a
 Tb.Th (mm)0.09 ± 0.00040.09 ± 0.0010.09 ± 0.0010.09 ± 0.002
 Conn.D (1/mm3)158.66 ± 11.79p58.48 ± 3.682.37 ± 3.76r,a72.15 ± 4.78a
 Tb.sp (mm)0.3 ± 0.03p0.73 ± 0.040.65 ± 0.01a0.59 ± 0.02r,a
 Tb.pf (1/mm)1.42 ± 0.51p6.33 ± 0.32.44 ± 0.27p3.39 ± 0.4p,c
 SMI1.48 ± 0.07q1.7 ± 0.031.43 ± 0.02q1.5 ± 0.04q
 DA1.8 ± 0.031.82 ± 0.061.8 ± 0.061.69 ± 0.02
Micro-CT measurements at tibial cancellous bone
 BV/TV (%)20.35 ± 1.64p8.8 ± 0.6513.38 ± 0.64r,a13.67 ± 1.06r,a
 Tb.N (1/mm)2.32 ± 0.17p0.98 ± 0.071.36 ± 0.06r,a1.45 ± 0.09r,a
 Tb.Th (mm)0.08 ± 0.0010.08 ± 0.0010.09 ± 0.0010.09 ± 0.001
 Conn.D (1/mm3)137 ± 10.12p33.9 ± 2.1255.52 ± 6.32r,a59.42 ± 4.15r,a
 Tb.sp (mm)0.23 ± 0.01p0.69 ± 0.040.5 ± 0.02p,a0.46 ± 0.01p,a
 Tb.pf (1/mm)6.41 ± 0.35q12.23 ± 0.788.19 ± 0.48q8.29 ± 0.48q
 SMI1.74 ± 0.03p2.05 ± 0.051.84 ± 0.02q1.83 ± 0.05q
 DA2.16 ± 0.042.18 ± 0.052.006 ± 0.032.01 ± 0.03
Micro-CT measurements at vertebral cancellous bone
 BV/TV (%)29.96 ± 1.85p15.06 ± 1.3621.06 ± 0.63r,b22.24 ± 3.25r,c
 Tb.N (1/mm)2.003 ± 0.1q1.28 ± 0.141.61 ± 0.071.62 ± 0.19
 Tb.Th (mm)0.13 ± 0.005p0.102 ± 0.0010.12 ± 0.001p,c0.11 ± 0.002p,b
 Conn.D (1/mm3)64.99 ± 4.23p17.77 ± 1.5626.35 ± 2.16r,a28.83 ± 1.12r,a
 Tb.sp (mm)0.38 ± 0.009q0.49 ± 0.020.41 ± 0.01r0.41 ± 0.02r
 Tb.pf (1/mm)0.86 ± 0.76r6.37 ± 0.824.16 ± 0.484.49 ± 1.22
 SMI0.86 ± 0.11p1.44 ± 0.040.96 ± 0.09p1.19 ± 0.01r,b,g
 DA2.09 ± 0.07p3.57 ± 0.092.62 ± 0.11p,b2.7 ± 0.15p,b
Vertebral bone strength
 Ultimate load (N) 203.33 ± 16.99p92 ± 4.32172 ± 17.65p143.33 ± 4.71q,b
 Energy (mJ)1009.05 ± 104.5q544.27 ± 83.01936.88 ± 43.47q1031.44 ± 112.01q
 Stiffness (N/mm)268.03 ± 41.77p66.57 ± 13.67206.86 ± 18.93q252.86 ± 40.6q

Values represent mean ± SEM; rats/group. p , q , and r compared to OVx + vehicle; a , b , and c compared to sham; f and g compared to ASFW.
BMD: bone mineral density, BV/TV: percent bone volume, Tb.N: trabecular number, Tb.Th: trabecular thickness, Conn.D: connection density, Tb.sp: trabecular separation, Tb.pf: trabecular pattern factor, SMI: structure model index, DA: degree of anisotropy.