Greater Skeletal Gains in Ovary Intact Rats at Maturity Are Achieved by Supplementing a Standardized Extract of Butea monosperma Stem Bark that Confers Better Bone Conserving Effect following Ovariectomy and Concurrent Treatment Withdrawal
Table 3
Effect on body weight, bone biochemical markers, trabecular bone mass, microarchitecture, and strength following ovariectomy and treatment withdrawal at the endpoint.
Parameters
Sham + vehicle (1% gum acacia)
OVx + vehicle (1% gum acacia)
OVx + vehicle (1% gum acacia) (ASFW)
OVx + E2 (10 μg/kg/day)
Body weight (gm)
232.3 ± 8.89
303.1 ± 8.27p
297.4 ± 7.93p
276.7 ± 13.05r
Bone biochemical markers
Serum OCN (ng/mL)
105.49 ± 8.76p
244.96 ± 6.76
203.93 ± 9.84q,a
97.27 ± 9.99p,e
Urinary CTx (ng/mL)
46.75 ± 11.4p
113.69 ± 4.66
76.6 ± 3.23p,b
66.37 ± 3.24p,c
BMD (g HA/cm3)
Femur metaphysis
0.234 ± 0.01q
0.166 ± 0.001
0.198 ± 0.007r
0.185 ± 0.01r
Proximal tibia metaphysis
0.248 ± 0.01p
0.118 ± 0.006
0.17 ± 0.006q,a
0.171 ± 0.01q,a
Vertebral cancellous bone
0.31 ± 0.014p
0.219 ± 0.006
0.264 ± 0.007q,b
0.265 ± 0.009q,b
Micro-CT measurements at femur cancellous bone
BV/TV (%)
24.8 ± 1.87p
12.07 ± 0.12
17.12 ± 0.38p,a
14.12 ± 0.56r,a,f
Tb.N (1/mm)
2.67 ± 0.27p
1.27 ± 0.01
1.79 ± 0.06r,a
1.71 ± 0.05r,a
Tb.Th (mm)
0.09 ± 0.0004
0.09 ± 0.001
0.09 ± 0.001
0.09 ± 0.002
Conn.D (1/mm3)
158.66 ± 11.79p
58.48 ± 3.6
82.37 ± 3.76r,a
72.15 ± 4.78a
Tb.sp (mm)
0.3 ± 0.03p
0.73 ± 0.04
0.65 ± 0.01a
0.59 ± 0.02r,a
Tb.pf (1/mm)
1.42 ± 0.51p
6.33 ± 0.3
2.44 ± 0.27p
3.39 ± 0.4p,c
SMI
1.48 ± 0.07q
1.7 ± 0.03
1.43 ± 0.02q
1.5 ± 0.04q
DA
1.8 ± 0.03
1.82 ± 0.06
1.8 ± 0.06
1.69 ± 0.02
Micro-CT measurements at tibial cancellous bone
BV/TV (%)
20.35 ± 1.64p
8.8 ± 0.65
13.38 ± 0.64r,a
13.67 ± 1.06r,a
Tb.N (1/mm)
2.32 ± 0.17p
0.98 ± 0.07
1.36 ± 0.06r,a
1.45 ± 0.09r,a
Tb.Th (mm)
0.08 ± 0.001
0.08 ± 0.001
0.09 ± 0.001
0.09 ± 0.001
Conn.D (1/mm3)
137 ± 10.12p
33.9 ± 2.12
55.52 ± 6.32r,a
59.42 ± 4.15r,a
Tb.sp (mm)
0.23 ± 0.01p
0.69 ± 0.04
0.5 ± 0.02p,a
0.46 ± 0.01p,a
Tb.pf (1/mm)
6.41 ± 0.35q
12.23 ± 0.78
8.19 ± 0.48q
8.29 ± 0.48q
SMI
1.74 ± 0.03p
2.05 ± 0.05
1.84 ± 0.02q
1.83 ± 0.05q
DA
2.16 ± 0.04
2.18 ± 0.05
2.006 ± 0.03
2.01 ± 0.03
Micro-CT measurements at vertebral cancellous bone
BV/TV (%)
29.96 ± 1.85p
15.06 ± 1.36
21.06 ± 0.63r,b
22.24 ± 3.25r,c
Tb.N (1/mm)
2.003 ± 0.1q
1.28 ± 0.14
1.61 ± 0.07
1.62 ± 0.19
Tb.Th (mm)
0.13 ± 0.005p
0.102 ± 0.001
0.12 ± 0.001p,c
0.11 ± 0.002p,b
Conn.D (1/mm3)
64.99 ± 4.23p
17.77 ± 1.56
26.35 ± 2.16r,a
28.83 ± 1.12r,a
Tb.sp (mm)
0.38 ± 0.009q
0.49 ± 0.02
0.41 ± 0.01r
0.41 ± 0.02r
Tb.pf (1/mm)
0.86 ± 0.76r
6.37 ± 0.82
4.16 ± 0.48
4.49 ± 1.22
SMI
0.86 ± 0.11p
1.44 ± 0.04
0.96 ± 0.09p
1.19 ± 0.01r,b,g
DA
2.09 ± 0.07p
3.57 ± 0.09
2.62 ± 0.11p,b
2.7 ± 0.15p,b
Vertebral bone strength
Ultimate load (N)
203.33 ± 16.99p
92 ± 4.32
172 ± 17.65p
143.33 ± 4.71q,b
Energy (mJ)
1009.05 ± 104.5q
544.27 ± 83.01
936.88 ± 43.47q
1031.44 ± 112.01q
Stiffness (N/mm)
268.03 ± 41.77p
66.57 ± 13.67
206.86 ± 18.93q
252.86 ± 40.6q
Values represent mean ± SEM; rats/group. p, q, and r compared to OVx + vehicle; a, b, and c compared to sham; f and g compared to ASFW. BMD: bone mineral density, BV/TV: percent bone volume, Tb.N: trabecular number, Tb.Th: trabecular thickness, Conn.D: connection density, Tb.sp: trabecular separation, Tb.pf: trabecular pattern factor, SMI: structure model index, DA: degree of anisotropy.