Review Article

An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Shenmai Injection for Healthcare

Table 1

Study characteristics of included systematic reviews.

First author (year)ConditionNo. of primary studiesQuality of primary studiesOverall conclusion+Meta-analysisQuality of review (OQAQ)*Result+ +/−

Zhang (2010) [9]Viral myocarditis among children15 (1018)Poor …may have some effect…The total effective rate: SMI plus RT versus RT (6RCTs): RR 1.16, 95% CI (1.07, 1.25); SMI plus RT versus western medicine plus RT (5RCTs): RR 1.12, 95% CI (1.01, 1.25); SMI plus western medicine versus western medicine versus RT (4RCTs): RR 1.26, 95% CI (1.12, 1.42)5+

Li (2011) [24]Viral myocarditis10 (649)Poor …tend to be effective…SMI plus routine therapy (RT) versus RT: The total effective rate: OR = 4.38, 95% CI (2.59, 7.38), ; The remarkable response rate: OR = 2.67, 95% CI (1.93, 3.71), 3+

Jin (2011) [10]Viral myocarditis among children7 (416)Poor …effective on…SMI plus RT versus RT: RR = 1.25, 95% CI (1.15, 1.36), 2+

Shi (2012) [16]Viral myocarditis12 (731)Poor …can increase the clinical efficacy…SMI plus RT versus RT: The total effective rate:
RR = 1.22, 95% CI (1.14, 1.30),
1+

Huang (2009) [23]AMI7 (901)Poor (C grade)…can decrease the mortality rate obviously…SMI plus RT versus RT: the fatality rate during hospitalization: RR = 0.55, 95% CI (0.33, 0.90), 4++

Zeng (2010) [21]AMI13 (1707)Poor (C grade)…can significantly decrease the mortality rate …SMI plus RT versus RT: The mortality rate: RR = 0.55, 95% CI (0.39, 0.76), 5++

Hu (2012) [14]AMI15 (1806)Poor …can decrease the mortality rate …SMI plus RT versus RT: the fatality rate during hospitalization: OR = 0.43, 95% CI (0.31, 0.60), 5+

Li (2006) [11]Acute cerebral infarction6 (477)Poor …have positive effects on…SMI versus blank control: the total effective rate:
RR = 1.20, 99% CI (1.09, 1.33),
3+

Shu (2008) [18]Acute cerebral infarction6 (563)Mostly poor…has a better effect on…SMI versus compound salvia miltiorrhiza injection
(CSMI): the total effective rate: OR = 4.73, 95% CI (2.61, 8.56),
2++

Ma (2010) [12]Acute cerebral infarction9 (645)Poor …have positive effects on…SMI plus RT versus RT: the total effective rate:
RR = 1.21, 99% CI (1.10, 1.33),
3+

Liu (2005) [19]An adjunct therapy to tumor chemotherapy13 (1040)Poor …may have positive effects on…SMI plus tumor chemotherapy versus tumor chemotherapy: the total effective rate: OR = 1.73,
95% CI (1.27, 2.34),
4+

Zhang (2010) [17]An adjunct treatment of patients with NSCLC7 (510)Mostly good…have positive effects on… (disease control rate and the occurrence of the gastrointestinal tract symptoms)SMI plus tumor chemotherapy versus tumor chemotherapy: the total efficiency rate: OR = 1.45,
95% CI (1.01, 2.07), ; the disease control rate:
OR = 2.31, 95% CI (1.42, 3.73), ; the occurrence of the gastrointestinal tract symptoms: OR = 0.37, 95% CI (0.26, 0.54),
5+
Cui (2010) [22]Coronary heart disease7 (510)Poor …have positive effects on…SMI plus RT versus RT Danshen injection plus RT: the total effective rate: OR = 6.71, 95% CI (2.53, 17.77), 4+

Wang (2011) [15]Coronary heart disease21 (2219)Mostly poor (4 B grade and 17 C grade)…effective on… obviouslySMI plus RT versus RT: the total effective rate:
OR = 3.43, 95% CI (2.73, 4.30),
3++

Li (2012) [25]Coronary heart disease18 (1986)Mostly Poor (2 articles 3 points and remaining 2 points)…have positive effects on…SMI plus RT versus RT: The total effective rate: RR = 1.31, 95% CI (1.20, 1.43), ; the ECG efficacy:
RR = 1.46, 95% CI (1.32, 1.62), ; the improvement rate of NYHA: RR = 1.79, 95% CI (1.28, 2.51),
2+

Hou (2010) [8]Heart Failure15 (1174)Mostly poor…improve the therapeutic effect on…SMI plus RT versus RT: the total effective rate:
RR = 1.27, 95% CI (1.19, 1.35),
5+

Li (2011) [24]Chronic pulmonary heart disease33 (2617)PoorPotential effectivenessSMI plus conventional medicine versus conventional medicine: the improvement in New York Heart Association classification of clinical status: OR = 0.24, 95% CI (0.19, 0.30), 5+

Liu (2012) [13]Dilated cardiomyopathy9 (688)Poor (C grade)…improve the therapeutic effect on…SMI plus RT versus RT: the total effective rate:
RR = 1.23, 95% CI (1.13, 1.33),
3+

Note: (OQAQ) refers to the overall score of OQAQ which is from 1 to 7. OQAQ ≤ 3, extensive or major flaws; OQAQ ≥ 5, minor or minimal flaws. Conclusion +: As judged by the authors of the respective SRs. Result+: +, overall positive; −: fail to show effectiveness; ±, unclear.